Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 143–166

Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults

  • Janet L. Lauritsen
  • Kenna F. Davis Quinet
Article

Abstract

Prior research has shown that victimization incidents are disproportionately concentrated among relatively few victims and that prior victimization is a consistent predictor of future risk. This paper expands existing knowledge on victimization by describing temporal patterns of risk and by developing and testing alternative explanatory models of the link between past and future risk. Analyses based on panel data from the National Youth Survey support both state dependence and heterogeneity interpretations of the correlation in risk over time. In other words, prior victimization predicts future risk in part because it alters something about the individual, and because it indicates an unmeasured propensity for victimization that persists over time. The theoretical implications of these findings, including the feasibility of a victim labeling perspective, are discussed.

Key words

repeat victimization adolescents state dependence heterogeneity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barr, R., and Pease, K. (1990). Crime placement, displacement and deflection. In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.),Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 12, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 277–315.Google Scholar
  2. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control.Am. Sociol Rev. 48: 34–45.Google Scholar
  3. Bursik, R. (1980). The dynamics of specialization in juvenile offenses.Soc. Forces 58: 851–864.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, L., and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 588–608.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, L., Kluegel, J., and Land, K. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 505–524.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, K. (1992).Patterns of Specialization and Escalation in Crime: A Longitudinal Analysis of Juvenile and Adult Arrest Transitions in the Glueck Data, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  7. Elliott, D., Knowles, B., and Canter, R. (1981). The epidemiology of delinquent behavior and drug use among American adolescents. Project Report No. 14, The National Youth Survey, Behavioral Research Institute, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  8. Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Farrell, G. (1992). Multiple victimization: Its extent and significance.Int. Rev. Criminol. 2: 85–102.Google Scholar
  10. Farrington, D. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. In Tonry, M. (ed.).Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 381–458.Google Scholar
  11. Fattah, E. (1967). Towards a criminological classification of victims.Int. Crim. Police Rev. 22: 163–169.Google Scholar
  12. Fattah, E. (1991).Understanding Criminal Victimization: An Introduction to Theoretical Victimology Prentice-Hall, Scarborough, Ontario.Google Scholar
  13. Feinberg, S. (1980). Statistical modelling in the analysis of repeat victimization. In Feinberg, S., and Reiss, A. (eds.),Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pp. 54–58.Google Scholar
  14. Garofalo, J., Siegel, L., and Laub, J. (1987). School-related victimizations among adolescents: An analysis of the National Crime Survey narratives.J. Quant. Criminol. 3: 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottfredson, M. (1984).Victims of Crime: The Dimensions of Risk, Home Office Research Study 81, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1990).A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Greene, W. (1992).LIMDEP User's Manual and Reference Guide (Version 6.0), Econometric Software, Bellport, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Greene, W. (1993).Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., and Garafalo, J. (1978).Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, G., and Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity theory.Violence Victims 1: 85–99.Google Scholar
  21. Knoke, D., and Burke, P. (1980).Log-Linear Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  22. Lauritsen, J., Sampson, R., and Laub, J. (1991). The link between offending and victimization among adolescents.Criminology 29(2): 265–291.Google Scholar
  23. Lauritsen, J., Laub, J., and Sampson, R. (1992). Conventional and delinquent activities: Implications for the prevention of violent victimizations among adolescents.Violence Victims 7: 91–108.Google Scholar
  24. Meier, R., and Miethe, T. (1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization. In Tonry, M. (ed.),Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 459–499.Google Scholar
  25. Nagin, D., and Paternoster, R. (1991). On the relationship of past to future participation in delinquency.Criminology 29: 163–189.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson, J. (1980). Multiple victimization in American cities: A statistical analysis of rare events.Am. J. Sociol. 85: 870–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reiss, A. (1980). Victim proneness in repeat victimization by type of crime. In Fienberg, S., and Reiss, A. (eds.).Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
  28. Sampson, R., and Laub, J. (1993).Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K., and Coie, J. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups.Child Dev. 64: 1755–1772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Singer, S. (1981). Homogenous victim-offender populations: A review and some research implications.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 72: 779–788.Google Scholar
  31. Sparks, R., Genn, H., and Dodd, D. (1977).Surveying Victims: A Study of the Measurement of Criminal Victimization, Perceptions of Crime, and Attitudes to Criminal Justice, Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  32. Sparks, R. (1981). Multiple victimization: Evidence, theory, and future research.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 72: 762–778.Google Scholar
  33. Sparks, R. (1982).Research on Victims of Crime: Accomplishments, Issues, and New Directions, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Trickett, A., Osborn, D., Seymour, J., and Pease, K. (1991). What is different about high crime areas?Br. J. Criminol. 32: 81–90.Google Scholar
  35. von Hentig, H. (1948).The Criminal and His Victim, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet L. Lauritsen
    • 1
  • Kenna F. Davis Quinet
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeSt. Louis
  2. 2.Indiana University-IndianapolisIndianapolis

Personalised recommendations