Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 3–21 | Cite as

Rap sheets in criminological research: Considerations and caveats

  • Michael R. Geerken
Article

Abstract

The types of errors found in official criminal history records are not completely understood by many researchers, and this lack of understanding can lead to serious misinterpretations. Analyses of a recently developed database of New Orleans offenders indicate that the use of rap sheets with a limited catchment area can lead to gross distortions of the effects of variables related to geographic mobility, such as race and age. Evidence from a number of sources indicates that false-negative error is a serious problem, particularly in fingerprint-based record systems. In addition, arrest records lend themselves to a variety of common misinterpretations by researchers in the coding process, including failing to identify multievent arrests, misclassifying arrests, and treating arrest or custody process events as crimes indicating criminal activity of the individual while free. Solutions to some of these problems are suggested.

Key words

rap sheet criminal history arrest record false-negative error 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belair, R. (1984). Legal rules and policy initiatives in the use of criminal justice information. InInformation Policy and Crime Control Strategies. Proceedings of a BJS/SEARCH Conference, SEARCH Group, Inc., Sacramento CA.Google Scholar
  2. Belair, R. (1985).Data Quality of Criminal History Records, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Blumstein, A., and Cohen, J. (1979). Estimation of individual crime rates from arrest records.J. Crim. Law and Criminol. 70: 561–585.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1991).Survey of Criminal History Information Systems, NCJ-125620.Google Scholar
  5. Geerken, M., Miranne, A., and Kennedy, M. B. (1993).The New Orleans Offender Study: Development of Official Record Databases, Report to the National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  6. Laudon, K. C. (1986).Dossier Society: Value Choices in the Design of National Information Systems, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Marchand, D. A. (1980).The Politics of Privacy, Computers, and Criminal Justice Records, Information Resources Press, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  8. Office of Technology Assessment (1982).An Assessment of Alternatives for a National Computerized Criminal History System, OTA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice (1967).The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Widom, C. (1989). Child abuse, neglect, and violent criminal behavior.Criminology 27: 251–271.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Geerken
    • 1
  1. 1.Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff and Department of SociologyTulane UniversityNew Orleans

Personalised recommendations