Plant and Soil

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 235–241 | Cite as

Occurrence ofAzospirillum spp. in coconut-based farming systems

  • S. K. Ghai
  • George V. Thomas
Article

Abstract

Occurrence of Azospirillum was investigated in coconut-based farming systems, such as high-density multispecies cropping (15 crops), multi-storeyed cropping (3 crops), mixed cropping with tea and coffee (2 crops), intercropping with tropical tubers (5 crops), mixed farming with grasses (3 crops) and in 3 crops, arecanut,Mimosa invisa and sugarcane from other plots. A total of 26 plantation crops and intercrops were included in the study. Incidence of Azospirillum was determined by 2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride reduction and by culturing root fragments in N-free semisolid malate medium. Root samples from guava, mango and mimosa did not show any tetrazolium reduction or sub-surface pellicular growth. The extent of occurrence of Azospirillum seemed to depend upon the crop combinations. In a mixed farming system where guinea grass was one of the component crops, more root fragments of coconut and pepper demonstrated tetrazolium reduction activity than when guinea grass was absent.Azospirillum lipoferum andA. brasilense constituted 42% and 45% of the isolates, respectively, in the coconut-based cropping systems. Isolates from guinea grass, sugarcane and jackfruit exhibited higher nitrogenase (C2H2 reduction) than those isolated from plantation crops, tuber crops and spices. The large variation in the extent of association and nitrogenase activity of isolates from different crops indicated the need for inoculation with efficient cultures in a number of crops in coconut-based cropping systems.

Key words

Azospirillum Cocos nucifera intercrops nitrogen fixation plantation crops tetrazolium reduction 

References

  1. Albert S L, Okon Y and Burris R H 1978 Effect of light and temperature on association betweenZea mays andSpirillum lipoferum. Plant Physiol. 60, 528–531.Google Scholar
  2. Barber L F, Russel S A and Evans H J 1979 Inoculation of millet withAzospirillum. Plant and Soil 52, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg R H, Tyler M E, Novick N J, Vasil V and Vasil I K 1980 Biology ofAzospirillum—Sugarcane association enhancement of nitrogenase activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39, 642–649.Google Scholar
  4. Boddey R M and Döbereiner J 1984 Nitrogen fixation associated with grasses and cereals.In Current Developments in Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Ed. N S Subba Rao. p. 277–313. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  5. Bouton J H and Zuberer D A 1979 Response ofPanicum maximum Jacq. to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense. Plant and Soil 52, 585–590.Google Scholar
  6. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (CPCRI) 1985 Annual Report 1983, Kasaragod, India.Google Scholar
  7. Cote R 1984 American-type culture collection media handbook. ATCC Maryland, USA p. 98.Google Scholar
  8. Döbereiner J 1983 Ten years ofAzospirillum. Experimentia (Supplement) 48, 9–23.Google Scholar
  9. Döbereiner J and Day J M 1976 Associative symbiosis in tropical grasses. Characterisation of micro-organisms and dinitrogen fixing sites. pp. 513–538.In Proc. 1st Intl. Symp. Nitrogen Fixation. Eds. W E Newton and C J Hymen Wash. State Univ. Press, Pullman.Google Scholar
  10. Döbereiner J, Marriel I E and Nery M 1976 Ecological distribution ofSpirillum lipoferum Beijerinck. Can. J. Microbiol. 22, 1464–1473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia M U, Hubbel D H and Gaskin M H 1978 Process of infection ofPanicum maximum bySpirillum lipoferum. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 26, 373–379.Google Scholar
  12. Magalhaes F M, Baldani J I, Souto S M, Kuykendal J R and Döbereiner J 1983 A new acid tolerantAzospirillum species. An. Acad. Brasil Cienc. 55, 417–430.Google Scholar
  13. Masterson C L and Murphey P M 1979 Acetylene reduction technique.In Recent Advances in Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Ed. N S Subba Rao. pp. 8–33. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  14. Nair P K R 1979 Intensive Multiple Cropping with Coconut in India: Programmes and Prospects. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin. p. 147.Google Scholar
  15. Nair S K and Subba Rao N S 1977 Microbiology of root region of coconut and cacao under mixed cropping. Plant and Soil 46, 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Patriquin D G and Döbereiner J 1978 Light microscopy observations of tetrazolium reducing bacteria in the endorhizosphere of maize and other grasses in Brazil. Can. J. Microbiol. 24, 734–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Patriquin D G, Gracioli D A and Ruschel A P 1980 Nitrogenase activity of sugarcane propagated from cuttings in sterile vermiculite. Soil Biol. Biochem. 12, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rao A V and Venkateshwarlu B 1985 Most probable number ofAzospirillum associated with roots of inoculated pearl millets. Plant and Soil 88, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rennie R J and Larson R I 1979 Dimtrogen fixation associated with disomic chromosome substitution lines of spring wheats. Can. J. Bot. 57, 2771–2775.Google Scholar
  20. Subba Rao N S 1983 Nitrogen fixing bacteria associated with plantation and orchard plants. Can. J. Microbiol. 29, 863–866.Google Scholar
  21. Tarrand J J, Kreig N R and Döbereiner J 1978, A taxonomic study of theSpirillum lipoferum group, with description of a new genusAzospirillum gen. nov. and two species,Azospirillum lipoferum (Beijerinck) combnov. andAzospirillum brasilense sp. nov. Can J. Microbiol. 24, 967–980.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Ghai
    • 1
  • George V. Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of MicrobiologyCentral Plantation Crops Research InstituteKasaragodIndia

Personalised recommendations