Residue of organochlorine compounds and mercury in birds' eggs from the Niagara Peninsula, Ontario

  • Richard Frank
  • Micheline Van Hove Holdrinet
  • William A. Rapley
Article

Abstract

Eggs (307) were collected in 1971 from twenty species of birds with a variety of feeding habits from the Niagara Peninsula. This area of Ontario is intensively developed for agriculture and heavy industry and has a large urban population. Representative species were obtained from both the terrestrial and aquatic food chains. Eggs were analyzed for organochlorine insecticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and total mercury. Eggs from carnivorous species at the top of the aquatic food chain had the highest mean residues of ΣDDT (7.6 to 22.4 ppm), PCB (3.5 to 74.0 ppm) and total mercury (0.64 to 0.83 ppm). Eggs from some terrestrial carnivores (red-tailed hawk and great horned owl) also had relatively high residues (2.5 to 3.9 ppm of ΣDDT, 0.2 to 1.0 ppm of PCB, 0.06 to 0.09 ppm of mercury), however levels were much lower than those found in eggs from aquatic-feeding carnivores. Eggs from one red-shouldered hawk had residues comparable to the aquatic feeding carnivores. Eggs from herbivorous and insectivorous birds of both aquatic and terrestrial environments contained much lower residues. PCB residues were slightly lower in eggs among the terrestrial feeding species (0.05 to 2.0 ppm) than among the aquatic feeders (0.14 to 4.0 ppm) and tended to be lower in eggs from terrestrial species collected in rural than in city environs. Levels of ΣDDT were similar in both groups with eggs from terrestrial feeders containing mean residues between 0.15 and 2.64 ppm and those from aquatic feeders between 0.33 and 2.79 ppm.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg, O. W., P. L. Diosady, and G. A. V. Rees: Column Chromatographie separation of polychlorinated biphenyls from chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides, and subsequent gas Chromatographie quantitation in terms of derivatives. Bull. Environ Contam. Toxicol.7, 338 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fimreite, N.: Mercury uses in Canada and their possible hazards as sources of mercury contamination. Environ. Pollution1, 119 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. Fimreite, N., W. N. Holsworth, J. A. Keith, P. A. Pearce, and I. M. Gruchy: Mercury in fish and fish-eating birds near sites of industrial contamination in Canada. Can. Field-Naturalist85, 211 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. Fimreite, N., R. W. Fyfe, and J. A. Keith: Mercury contamination of Canadian prairie seed eaters and their avian predators. Can. Field-Naturalist84, 269 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Gilbertson, M., and L. M. Reynolds: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in the eggs of common terns in Hamilton Harbour, Ontario. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.7, 371 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamence, J. H., P. S. Hall, and D. J. Caverly: The identification and determination of chlorinated pesticide residues. Analyst90, 649 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Harrison, H. L., O. L. Loucks, J. W. Mitchell, D. F. Parkhurst, C. R. Tracy, D. W. Watts, and V. J. Yannacone: Systems studies of DDT transport. Science170, 503 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hatch, W. R., and W. L. Ott. Determination of sub-microgram quantities of mercury by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem.40, 2085 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. Hickey, J. J., J. A. Keith, and F. B. Coon: An exploration of pesticides in a Lake Michigan ecosystem. J. Appl. Ecol.3 (Suppl), 141 (1966).Google Scholar
  10. Jensen, S., A. G. Johnels, M. Olsson, and G. Otterling: DDT and PCB in marine animals in Swedish waters. Nature224, 247 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnels, A. G., and T. Westermark: Mercury contamination of the environment in Sweden. In Chemical Fallout, pp. 221–224. M. W. Miller and G. G. Berg (Eds.) C. C. Thomas: Springfield, Illinois (1969).Google Scholar
  12. Keith, J. O.: Insecticide contamination in wetland habitats and their effect on fish-eating birds. J. Appl. Ecol.3 (Suppl), 71 (1966).Google Scholar
  13. Koeman, J. H., M. C. Ten noever de Brauw, and R. H. De Vos: Chlorinated biphenyls in fish, mussels and birds from the river Rhine and the Netherlands coastal area. Nature221, 1126 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Langlois, B. E., A. R. Stemp, and B. J. Liska: Analyses of animal food products for chlorinated insecticides. J. Milk Food Tech.27, 202 (1964).Google Scholar
  15. McCully, K. A., and W. P. McKinley. Determination of chlorinated pesticide residues in fat by electron capture gas chromatography. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists47, 652 (1964).Google Scholar
  16. Moore, W. W., and C. H. Walker. Organochlorine insecticide residues in wild birds. Nature201, 1072 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ontario Ministry of agriculture and Food: Agricultural Statistics for Ontario 1971, Publication 20, Parliament Buildings, Queens Park, Toronto, Ontario (1971).Google Scholar
  18. Risebrough, R. W., P. Rieche, D. B. Peakall, S. G. Herman, and M. N. Kroen: Polychlorinated biphenyls in the global ecosystem. Nature220, 1098 (1968a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Risebrough, R. W., R. J. Huggett, J. J. Griffen, and E. D. Goldberg: Pesticides: Transatlantic movement in the northeast trades. Science159, 1233 (1968b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson, J.: Organochlorine insecticides and bird populations in Britain. In Chemical Fallout pp. 113–173. M. W. Miller and G. G. Berg (Eds.) C. C. Thomas: Springfield, Illinois (1969).Google Scholar
  21. Vermeer K., and L. M. Reynolds. Organochlorine residues in aquatic birds in Canadian prairie provinces. Can. Field-Naturalist84, 117 (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Frank
    • 1
  • Micheline Van Hove Holdrinet
    • 1
  • William A. Rapley
    • 2
  1. 1.Provincial Pesticide Residue Testing Lab.Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and FoodUSA
  2. 2.Metropolitan Toronto ZooWest Hill

Personalised recommendations