Plant and Soil

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 237–241

Mycorrhizal infection and foliar phosphorus content of seedlings of three dipterocarp species growing in a selectively logged forest and a forest plantation

  • S. S. Lee
  • K. L. Lim


Foliar phosphorus content and mycorrhizal infection of dipterocarp seedlings growing in a 61-year-old forest plantation (site A) and a selectively logged forest (site B) were determined. Mycorrhizal infection levels were high−83.7% forShorea bracteolata and 95.0% forS. leprosula at site A, and 77.8% forS. leprosula and 86.3% forS. curtisii at site B. The seedlings all had similar foliar phosphorus contents although available soil phosphorus at site B was half that at site A. Significant correlations were obtained between foliar phosphorus content and percentage mycorrhizal infection at site B only.

Key words

dipterocarps foliar phosphorus forest plantation logged forest mycorrhizas Shorea spp 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. de Alwis D P and Abeynayake K 1980 A survey of mycorrhizae in some forest trees of Sri Lanka.In Tropical Mycorrhiza Research. Ed. P Mikola. pp 135–155. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold C Y 1947 Analysis of vegetable fertilizer plots with a soil test which measures acid soluble and adsorbed phosphorus. Soil Science 64, 101.Google Scholar
  3. Becker P 1983 Ectomycorrhizae on Shorea (Dipterocarpaceae) seedlings in a lowland Malaysian rainforest. The Malaysian Forester 46, 146–170.Google Scholar
  4. Black C A (Ed.) 1965 Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomists Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Burgess P F 1971 The effect of logging on hill dipterocarp forest. Malayan Nature Journal 24, 231–237.Google Scholar
  6. Chalermpongse A 1987 Mycorrhizal survey of dry-deciduous and semi-evergreen dipterocarp forest ecosystems in Thailand.In Proceedings of the Third Round Table Conference on Dipterocarps. Ed. A J C H Kostermans, pp 81–103.Google Scholar
  7. Douglas I 1963 Erosion in Sungai Gombak catchment, Selangor, Malaysia. Malaysian J. Trop. Georg. 44, 1–16.Google Scholar
  8. Guha M M and Yeow K H 1966 Soil and leaf nutrient status in relation to soil type. Planters' Bulletin of the Rubber Research Institute of Malaya. 87, 170–177.Google Scholar
  9. Jurgensen M F, Larsen M J and Harvey A E 1979 Forest soil biology-Timber harvesting relationships: A perspective. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT 69, 12 p.Google Scholar
  10. Lau C H 1979 Chemistry and fertility of soils.In Anon., Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia Training Manual on Soils, Management of Soils and Nutrition of Hevea, pp 41–53. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia.Google Scholar
  11. Lee S S 1988 The ectomycorrhizas ofShorea leprosula (Miq.) (Dipterocarpaceae).In Trees and Mycorrhiza. Proceedings of the Asian Seminar, 13–17 April 1987, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Ed. F S P Ng. pp 189–206. Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
  12. Liew T C and Wong F O 1973 Density, recruitment, mortality and growth of dipterocarp seedlings in virgin and logged-over forests in Sabah. The Malaysian Forester 36, 3–15.Google Scholar
  13. Marks G C and Foster R C 1973 Structure, morphogenesis and ultra-structure of ectomycorrhizae.In Ectomycorrhizae: Their Physiology and Ecology. Eds. G C Marks and T T Kozlowski. pp 1–41. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  14. Miller C D and Miller E W 1948 Plant tissue analysis. Anal. Chem. 20, 481–488.Google Scholar
  15. Mohd Noor Shamsuddin 1979 Mycorrhizas of tropical forest trees. Abstract. V. International Symposium on Tropical Ecology. 16–21 April, 1979, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  16. Nicholson D I 1960 Light requirements of Dipterocarp seedlings. The Malayan Forester 23, 344–356.Google Scholar
  17. Norhayati Moris and Singh M H 1980 Soil chemical properties analysis. Rubber Research Institute, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  18. Nylund J E, Kasimir R, Arveby A S and Unestam T 1982 Simple diagnosis of ectomycorrhiza formation and demonstration of the architecture of the Hartig net by means of a clearing technique. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 12, 103–107.Google Scholar
  19. Owen G 1953 Determination of available nutrients in Malayan soils. J. Rubber Res. Inst. Malaya 14, 109.Google Scholar
  20. Pushparajah E and Tan K T 1972 Factors influencing leaf nutrient levels in rubber. Proceedings of the Rubeer Research Institute of Malaysia Planters' Conference, Kuala Lumpur. pp 140–154.Google Scholar
  21. Peh C H 1983 Runoff and sediment transport by overland flow under tropical rainforest conditions. The Malaysian Forester 43, 56–67.Google Scholar
  22. Shorrocks V M 1962 Leaf analysis as a guide to the nutrition ofHevea brasiliensis V. A leaf sampling technique for mature trees. J. Rubber Res. Inst. Malaya 17, 167.Google Scholar
  23. Shorrocks V M 1965 Leaf analysis as a guide to the nutrition ofHevea brasiliensis VI. Variations in leaf nutrient composition with age of leaf and with time. J. Rubber Res. Inst. Malaya 19, 1.Google Scholar
  24. Singh K G 1966 Ectotrophic mycorrhiza in equatorial rainforests. The Malayan Forester 29, 13–19.Google Scholar
  25. Smits W Th M 1983 Dipterocarps and mycorrhiza: An ecological adaptation and a factor in forest regeneration. Flora Malesiana Bulletin 36, 3926–3937.Google Scholar
  26. White E H 1974 Whole tree harvesting depletes soil nutrients. Can. J. For. Res. 4, 530–535.Google Scholar
  27. Whitmore T C 1984 Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East. Second edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Yusuf Muda 1985 A Preliminary Study on the Occurrence of Some Mycorrhizal Dipterocarp Seedlings in the Hill Forest. B. S. (For.) thesis. University Pertanian Malaysia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. S. Lee
    • 1
  • K. L. Lim
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversity Pertanian MalaysiaSerdang, SelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations