Plant and Soil

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 89–98 | Cite as

Aggregation inAzospirillum brasilense Cd: Conditions and factors involved in cell-to-cell adhesion

  • Lea Madi
  • Y. Henis
Article

Abstract

Aggregation of the root-inhabiting, asymbiotic N-fixingAzospirillum brasilense Cd (ATCC-29729), was studied. Aggregation occurred towards the end of the exponential phase and during the stationary phase. More aggregates were formed in media supplemented with organic acids than in those containing sugars as a sole carbon source. Maximum growth with no aggregation was obtained in a medium containing both fructose and malate as carbon sources. Aggregation was increased by poly-L-lysine and carbodiimide as well as by increasing the C/N ratio and decreasing combined nitrogen in the growth medium. Aggregates were stable at pH levels of >8 and <6, but dispersed at pH 7.1. Treatment of Azospirillum with NaEDTA resulted in loss of both aggregative capacity and the ability of adsorb to wheat roots without losing cell viability. When extracted bacteria were suspended in their dialysed NaEDTA extract, both their aggregative and adsorptive capacities were restored.

The dialysed NaEDTA extract agglutinated bacterial cells and red blood cells, especially of type O. When the extract was run through a sepharose gel, it separated into three main fractions, of which only one showed agglutinating capacity. Gel electrophoresis of this fraction revealed a single band (MW 97,000) which reacted positively to Schiff's reagent and Coomassie brilliant blue R-250, typical to a glycoprotein. Bacterial agglutination by this fraction was strongly inhibited by D-glucose, melibiose and α-metyl glucoside. No evidence as to the involvement of cellulose fibrils in aggregation was found. It is suggested that glycoprotein(s) and glucose residues located on the outer surface of the cells are involved in aggregation of Azospirillum.

Key words

agglutination aggregation cellulose fibrils C/N ratio flocculation NaEDTA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barak R, Elad D, Mirelman D and Chet I 1985 Lectins: A possible basis for specific recognition in the interaction of Trichoderma andSclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology 75, 458–462.Google Scholar
  2. Calleja G B 1984 Microbial Aggregation. CRC Press, Florida, 276 p.Google Scholar
  3. Das A and Mishra A K 1983 Utilization of fructose byAzospirillum brasilense. Can. J. Microbiol. 78, 42–57.Google Scholar
  4. Deinema M and Zevenhuizen L P T M 1971 Formation of cellulose fibrills by gram-negative bacteria and their role in bacterial flocculation. Arch. Mikrobiol. 78, 42–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Deguid J P and Wilkinson J P 1961 Environmental induced change in bacterial morphology.In Microbial Reaction to Environment, Eleventh Symposium of the Society For General Microbiology. Eds. G G Meynell and H Gooder. pp 69–99. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Eggest G, Stenberg E and Kjosbakken J 1983 Flocculation of methanol-oxidizing bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129, 3610–3617.Google Scholar
  7. Feldner J, Bredt W and Kahane I 1983 Influence of cell shape and surface charge on attachment ofMycoplasma pneumonia to glass surfaces. J. Bacteriol. 153, 1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster R C and Bowen G D 1982 Plant surfaces bacterial growth: The rhizosphere and rhizoplane.In Phytopathogenic Prokaryots. Vol 1 Eds. M S Mount and G H Lacy. pp 159–185. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Madi L, Kessel M, Sadovnik E and Henis Y 1988 Electron microscopic studies of aggregation and pellicle formation inAzospirillum spp. Plant and Soil 109, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Matthysse A G, Holmes K V and Gurlitz R H 1981 Elaboration of cellulose fibrils byAgrobacterium tumifaciens during attachment to carrot cells. J. Bacteriol. 145, 583–595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ohyama K, Pelcer L E and Schaefer A 1979In vitro binding ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells from suspension culture. Plant Physiol. 63, 382–387.Google Scholar
  12. Okon Y, Albrecht S L and Burris R H 1977 Methods for growingSpirillum lipoferum and for counting it in pure culture and in association with plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 85–88.Google Scholar
  13. Okon Y, Houchins J P, Albrecht S L and Burris R H 1977 Growth ofSpirillum lipoferum at constant partial pressures of oxygen and the properties of its nitrogenase in cell-free extracts. J. Gen. Microbiol. 98, 87–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Okon Y, Albrecht S L and Burris R H 1976 Carbon and ammonia metabolism ofSpirillum lipoferum. J. Gen. Bacteriol. 128, 592–597.Google Scholar
  15. Rosen S D, Haywood P L and Barondes S H 1976 Inhibition of intercellular adhesion in a cellular slime mould by univalent antibody against a cell surface lectin. Nature 263, 425–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sadasivan L and Neyra C A 1985 Flocculation inAzospirillum brasilese andAzospirillum lipoferum: Exopolysaccharides and cyst formation. J. Bacteriol. 163, 716–723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sedmak J J and Grossberg S E 1977 A rapid sensitive and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie brilliant blue G250. Anal. Biochem. 798, 544–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lea Madi
    • 1
  • Y. Henis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of AgricultureThe Hebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations