Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 643–656

Parasitism rates in relation to nest site in bees and wasps (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)

  • William T. Wcislo
Article

Abstract

To account for differences in occurrence of social behavior in different lineages of bees, Michener (1985) hypothesized that ground nests are more easily located by parasites than are twig nests. In the former case parasites search in two dimensions, while in the latter they search in three-dimensional space. One prediction derived from this hypothesis is that ground nests will have higher rates of parasitism than twig nests. A survey of published reports on rates of cell parasitism for 92 species of nesting bees and wasps (Apoidea) shows no significant differences in mean parasitism rates between these two classes of nests. The analyses were repeated at the generic level (N=44), yielding the same pattern. These data may be biased due to phylogenetic effects. Paired comparisons (n=11 pairs) of related taxa that differ in nest site show that ground-nesting taxa more often have higher rates of parasitism than twig-nesters. The use of artificial “trap-nests” to study twig-nesters significantly enhances the success rate of parasites. This bias, as well as several other limitations, suggests that experimental studies of the host-searching capabilities of parasites and predators may be more efficacious than such comparative tests.

Key Words

Apoidea bee sphecid wasp parasitism search behavior habitat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, B. A. (1992). An exploratory analysis of cladistic relationships within the superfamily Apoidea, with special reference to sphecid wasps (Hymenoptera).J. Hymen. Res. 1: 26–61.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, W. J. (1991).Searching Behavior: The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources, Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  3. Bernays, E. A., and Wcislo, W. T. (1994). Sensory capabilities, information processing, and resource specialization.Q. Rev. Biol. 69: 187–204.Google Scholar
  4. Bohart, G. E., and Cross, E. A. (1955). Time relationships in the nest construction and life cycle of the alkali bee.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 48: 403–406.Google Scholar
  5. Bohart, G. E., and MacSwain, J. W. (1940). Notes on two chrysidids parasitic on western bembicid wasps.Pan-Pacif. Entomol. 16: 92–93.Google Scholar
  6. Bohart, R. M., and Menke, A. S. (1976).Sphecid Wasps of the World: A Generic Revision, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Bohart, G. E., Stephen, W. P., and Epply, R. K. (1960). The biology ofHeterostylum robustum (Diptera: Bombyliidae), a parasite of the alkali bee.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53: 425–435.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, D. R., and McLennan, D. A. (1993).Parascript: Parasites and the Language of Evolution, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, R. W. (1983). Systematics and biomomics ofAnthophora: The Bomboides group and species groups of the New World (Hymenoptera: Apoidea, Anthophoridae).Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 98: 1–86.Google Scholar
  10. Clement, S. L. (1973). The nesting biology ofMelissodes (Eumelissodes) rustica (Say), with a description of the larva.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 46: 516–525.Google Scholar
  11. Danks, H. V. (1971). Biology of some stem-nesting aculeate Hymenoptera.Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 122: 323–399.Google Scholar
  12. Eickwort, G. C. (1967). Aspects of the biology ofChilicola ashmeadi in Costa Rica (Hymenoptera: Colletidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 40: 42–73.Google Scholar
  13. Eickwort, G. C., Eickwort, J. M., Gordon, J., and Eickwort, M. (1996). Solitary behavior in a high-altitude population of the social sweat beeHalictus rubicundus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 227–233.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, H. E. (1957).Studies on the Comparative Ethology of Digger Wasps of the Genus Bembix, Comstock, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, H. E. (1971). Observations on the nesting behavior of wasps of the tribe cercerini.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 44: 500–523.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, H. E. (1978). Observations on the nests and prey of eumenid wasps (Hymenoptera, Eumenidae).Psyche 84: 255–259.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, H. E., and O'Neill, K. M. (1988).The Natural History and Behavior of North American Beewolves, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, H. E., Kurczewski, F. E., and Alcock, J. (1980). Observations on the nesting behaviour of seven species ofCrabro.J. Nat. Hist. 14: 865–882.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, B. E. (1982). The comparative distribution and population dynamics in Trinidad ofSceliphron fistularium (Dahlbom) andS. asiaticum (L.) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17: 343–360.Google Scholar
  20. Hager, B. J., and Kurczewski, F. E. 1986. Nesting behavior ofAmmophila harti (Fernald) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Am. Midl. Nat. 116: 7–24.Google Scholar
  21. Harvey, P. H., and Pagel, M. D. (1991).The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Hawkins, W. A. (1975). Nesting biology ofOsmia (Chalcosmia) georgica), (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 48: 493–499.Google Scholar
  23. Hawkins, B. A. (1994).Pattern & Process in Host-Parasitoid Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Hunt, J. H. (1993). Survivorship, fecundity, and recruitment in a mud dauber wasp,Sceliphron assimile (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86: 51–59.Google Scholar
  25. Krombein, K. V. (1964). Natural history of Plummers Island, Maryland. XVIII. The hibiscus wasp, an abundant rarity, and its associates (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 77: 73–112.Google Scholar
  26. Krombein, K. V. (1967).Trap-nesting Wasps and Bees: Life History, Nests, and Associates, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Kurczewski, F. E., and Ginsburg, S. E. (1971). Nesting behavior ofTachytes (Tachyplena) validus.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 44: 113–131.Google Scholar
  28. Lin, N., and Michener, C. D. (1972). Evolution of sociality in insects.Q. Rev. Biol. 47: 131–159.Google Scholar
  29. Linsley, E. G. (1958). The ecology of solitary bees.Hilgardia 27: 543–599.Google Scholar
  30. Linsley, E. G., and MacSwain, J. W. (1942). The parasites, predators, and inquiline associates ofAnthophora linsleyi.Am. Midl. Nat. 27: 402–417.Google Scholar
  31. Linsley, E. G., and MacSwain, J. W. (1952). Notes on some effects of parasitism upon a small population ofDiadasia bituberculata (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae).Pan-Pacif. Entomol. 28: 131–135.Google Scholar
  32. Linsley, E. G., and MacSwain, J. W. (1956). Some observations on the nesting habits and prey ofCerceris californica Cresson (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 49: 71–84.Google Scholar
  33. Linsley, E. G., MacSwain, J. W., and Smith, R. F. (1952). The bionomics ofDiadasia consociata Timberlake and some biological relationships of emphorine and anthophorine bees.Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 9: 267–290.Google Scholar
  34. Linsley, E. G., MacSwain, J. W., and Michener, C. D. (1980). Nesting biology and associates ofMelitoma.Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 90: 1–45.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, T. (1995). Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food.Ecol. Monogr. 65: 101–127.Google Scholar
  36. Matthews, R. W. (1991). Evolution of social behavior in sphecid wasps. In Ross, K. G., and Matthews, R. W. (eds.),The Social Biology of Wasps, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 570–602.Google Scholar
  37. Medler, J. T. (1965). Biology ofIsodontia (Murrayella) mexicana in trap-nests in Wisconsin (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 58: 137–142.Google Scholar
  38. Medler, J. T. (1967a).Hoplitis cylindrica in trap nests in Wisconsin (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 40: 137–140.Google Scholar
  39. Medler, J. T. (1967b). Biology ofTrypoxylon in trap-nests in Wisconsin (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Am. Midl. Nat. 78: 344–358.Google Scholar
  40. Michener, C. D. (1953). The biology of a leafcutter bee (Megachile brevis) and its associates.Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 35: 1659–1748.Google Scholar
  41. Michener, C. D. (1974).The Social Behavior of the Bees, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Michener, C. D. (1985). From solitary to eusocial: Need there be a series of intervening species? In Hölldobler, B., and Lindauer, M. (eds.),Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, G. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 293–305.Google Scholar
  43. Michener, C. D. (1990). Reproduction and castes in social halictine bees. In Engels, W. (ed.),Social Insects: An Evolutionary Approach to Castes and Reproduction, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 77–121.Google Scholar
  44. Molumby, A. (1995). Dynamics of parasitism in the organ-pipe wasp,Trypoxylon politum: Effects of spatial scale on parasitoid functional response.Ecol. Entomol. 20: 159–168.Google Scholar
  45. O'Toole, C., and Raw, A. (1991).Bees of the World, Facts on File, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Parker, F. D. (1986). Field studies withOsmia sanrafaelae, a pollinator of alfalfa (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 79: 384–386.Google Scholar
  47. Parker, F. D. (1987). Nests ofCallanthidium from block traps (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).Pan-Pacif. Entomol. 63: 125–129.Google Scholar
  48. Parker, F. D. (1988). Nesting biology of two North American species ofChelostoma (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).Pan-Pacif. Entomol. 64: 1–7.Google Scholar
  49. Rau, P. (1928). The nesting habits of the little carpenter-bee,Ceratina calcarata.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 21: 380–397.Google Scholar
  50. Raw, A. (1972). The biology of the solitary beeOsmia rufa (L.) (Megachilidae).Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 124: 213–229.Google Scholar
  51. Roig-Alsina, A., and Michener, C. D. (1993). Studies of the phylogeny and classification of longtongued bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea).Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 55: 124–162.Google Scholar
  52. Rosenheim, J. A. (1990). Density-dependent parasitism and the evolution of aggregated nesting in the solitary Hymenoptera.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83: 277–286.Google Scholar
  53. Rozen, J. G., Jr. (1984). Comparative nesting biology of the bee tribe Exomalopsini (Apoidea: Anthophoridae).Am. Mus. Novit. 2798: 1–37.Google Scholar
  54. Rozen, J. G., Jr., and Michener, C. D. (1968). The biology ofScrapter and its cuckoo bee,Pseudodichroa (Hymenoptera: Colletidae & Anthophoridae).Am. Mus. Novit. 2335: 1–13.Google Scholar
  55. Rust, R. W. (1986). Biology ofOsmia (Osmia) ribifloris Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 59: 89–94.Google Scholar
  56. Rust, R. W., and Thorp, R. W. (1973). The biology ofStelis chlorocyanea, a parasite ofOsmia nigrifrons.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 46: 548–562.Google Scholar
  57. Sakagami, S. F., Ebmer, A. W., Matsumura, T., and Maeta, Y. (1982). Bionomics of the halictine bees in northern Japan II.Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) sakagamii (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae), with taxonomic notes on allied species.Kontyû 50: 198–211.Google Scholar
  58. Sheehan, W. (1984). Nesting biology of the sand waspStictia heros (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Nyssoninae) in Costa Rica.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 57: 377–386.Google Scholar
  59. Shinn, A. (1967). A revision of the bee genusCalliopsis and the biology and ecology ofC. andreniformis (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae).Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 46: 753–936.Google Scholar
  60. Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Stockhammer, K. A. (1967). Some notes on the biology of the blue sweat bee,Lasioglossum coeruleum.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 40: 177–189.Google Scholar
  62. Taffe, C. A., and Ittyeipe, K. (1976). Effect of nest substrata on the mortality ofEumenes colona Saussure (Hymenoptera) and its inquilines.J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 303–311.Google Scholar
  63. Tepedino, V. J., and Parker, F. D. (1984). Nest selection, mortality and sex ratio inHoplitis fulgida (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 57: 181–189.Google Scholar
  64. Torchio, P. F. (1975). The biology ofPerdita nuda and descriptions of its immature forms and those of itsSphecodes parasite (Hymenoptera: Apoidea).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 48: 257–279.Google Scholar
  65. Torchio, P. F., Rozen, J. G., Jr., Bohart, G. E., and Favreau, M. S. (1967). Biology ofDufourea and of its cleptoparasite,Neopasites (Hymenoptera: Apoidea).J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 75: 132–146.Google Scholar
  66. Vinson, S. B., Frankie, G. W., and Coville, R. E. (1987). Nesting habits ofCentris flavofasciata Friese (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophoridae) in Costa Rica.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 60: 249–263.Google Scholar
  67. Watmough, R. H. (1983). Mortality, sex ratio and fecundity in natural populations of large carpenter bees (Xylocopa spp.).J. Anim. Ecol. 52: 111–125.Google Scholar
  68. Wcislo, W. T. (1984). Gregarious nesting of a digger wasp as a “selfish herd” response to a parasitic fly (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae; Diptera: Sacrophagidae) [sic]Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 157–160.Google Scholar
  69. Wcislo, W. T. (1986). Host nest discrimination by a cleptoparasitic fly,Metopia campestris (Fallén) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae: Miltogramminae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 59: 82–88.Google Scholar
  70. Wcislo, W. T. (1987). The role of seasonality, host-synchrony, and behaviour in the evolutions and distributions of nest parasites in Hymenoptera (Insecta), with special reference to bees (Apoidea).Biol. Rev. 62: 515–543.Google Scholar
  71. Wcislo, W. T. (1992). Nest localization and recognition in a solitary bee,Lasioglossum figueresi Wcislo (Hymenontera: Halictidae), in relation to sociality.Ethology 92: 108–123.Google Scholar
  72. Wcislo, W. T. (1996). Behavioral environments of sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictinae) in relation to variability in social organization. In Crespi, B., and Choe, J. C. (eds.),Social Competition and Cooperation in Insects and Arachnids. II. Evolution of Sociality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press).Google Scholar
  73. Wcislo, W. T., and Cane, J. H. (1996). Floral resource utilization by solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea), and exploitation of their stored food by natural enemies.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 257–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Wcislo, W. T., Low, B. S., and Karr, C. J. (1985). Parasite pressure and repeated burrow use by different individuals ofCrabro (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae; Diptera: Sarcophagidae).Sociobiology 11: 115–125.Google Scholar
  75. Wcislo, W. T., Wille, A., and Orozco, E. (1993). Nesting biology of tropical solitary and social sweat bees,Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi, Wcislo andL. (D.) aeneiventre (Friese) (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).Insectes Soc. 40: 21–40.Google Scholar
  76. Wcislo, W. T., Minckley, R. L., Leschen, R. A. B., and Reyes, S. B. (1994). Rates of parasitism by natural enemies of a solitary bee,Dieunomia triangulifera (Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera), in relation to phenologies.Sociobiology 23: 265–273.Google Scholar
  77. Weaving, A. J. S. (1996). A comparison of nesting success and nesting habits in some Afrotropical aculeate wasps, with particular reference to nest parasites (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae, Eumenidae).Ann Cape Prov. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) (in press).Google Scholar
  78. Wilkinson, L. (1989).SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, Systat Inc., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • William T. Wcislo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstituteBalboaRepublic of Panamá
  2. 2.Unit 0948, APO AASmithsonian Tropical Research InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations