Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 8, pp 484–490

Ethics, informed consent, and assisted reproduction

  • Ruth Macklin
Medical Ethics

Abstract

Informed consent to treatment is an ethical requirement often misunderstood or not fully appreciated by physicians. The purpose of obtaining informed consent is to ensure that patients know what doctors propose to do and freely grant their permission. Although the purpose of informed consent and the standards by which it is to be employed are the same in all areas of medical practice, special problems arise in assisted reproduction. Voluntary, informed consent is an instance of a reproductive right that should be recognized by the international medical community, and not limited to Western and European countries.

Key words

informed consent autonomy reproductive rights IVF egg donation cryopreservation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Ethics, ACOG Committee Opinion Number 108, Ethical dimensions of informed consent, May 1992, p 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See, for example, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research,The Belmont Report, Washington DC, DHEW Publication No. 0578-0012, 1978; Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 1989Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beauchamp and Childress; Faden RR, Beauchamp TL: A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, Oxford University Press, 1986Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beauchamp and Childress, p. 71Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mill JS: Utilitarianism, On Liberty, and Essay on Mill, by M Warnock (ed). New York, New American Library, 1974Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beauchamp and Childress, p. 78Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Infertility: Medical and Social Choices, OTA-BA-358. Washington DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988, p 182 (hereinafter, OTA report)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    OTA report, p 182Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bonnicksen AL: Embryo freezing: ethical issues in the clinical setting, Hastings Center Report, Vol. 18, December 1988, p 28Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonnicksen, p. 28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    OTA report, p. 211Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Personal interview conducted in Lima, Peru, June 1994, as part of a project on ethics and reproductive health sponsored by the Ford FoundationGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conference of health sector personnel in Mexico City, February 1993, part of a project on ethics and reproductive health sponsored by the Ford FoundationGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Personal interview conducted in Bombay, India, March 1994, as part of a project on ethics and reproductive health sponsored by the Ford FoundationGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolata G: Frozen embryos: few rules in a rapidly growing field,New York Times, June 5, 1992, p A10Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    See, for example, Cook R: International human rights and women's reproductive health, Stud Family Plan 1993;24:73–86Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Macklin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Social MedicineAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronx

Personalised recommendations