Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 525–538 | Cite as

Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts

  • Robert L. Koegel
  • Mary O'Dell
  • Glen Dunlap


It has been extremely difficult to teach speech to severely handicapped nonverbal autistic children. However, an overview of the literature suggests the possibility that selecting aspects of motivation as a central target behavior, rather than concentrating on motor speech production per se, may improve the effectiveness of teaching speech to these children. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to compare two different reinforcement conditions; one in which successive motor approximations of speech sounds were reinforced; and a “motivation” condition in which attempts to produce speech sounds were reinforced, without any motor shaping of speech. The results, replicated within a repeated reversal disign, showed that reinforcing speech attempts was more effective than reinforcing motor speech sounds with respect to (a) the children's interest, enthusiasm, happiness, and general behavior during treatment; and (b) improvements in the children's speech production. The results are discussed in terms of their relationship to the literature on normal parent-child speech interaction, success and failure, and learned helplessness.


School Psychology Reinforcement Condition General Behavior Target Behavior Speech Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984).Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  2. Churchill, D. W. (1971). Effects of success and failure in psychotic children.Archives of General Psychiatry, 25, 208–214.Google Scholar
  3. Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41–64.Google Scholar
  4. Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. L. (1980). Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 619–627.Google Scholar
  5. Egel, A. L. (1980). The effects of constant versus varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 455–463.Google Scholar
  6. Egel, A. L. (1981). Reinforcer variation: Implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 345–350.Google Scholar
  7. Fineman, K. R. (1968). Shaping and increasing verbalizations in an autistic child in response to visual color stimulation.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 27, 1071–1074.Google Scholar
  8. Garcia, E. E., & DeHaven, E. D. (1974). Use of operant techniques in the establishment and generalization of language: A review and analysis.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 169–178.Google Scholar
  9. Goetz, L., Schuler, A., & Sailor, W. (1983). Motivational considerations in teaching language to severely handicapped studlents. In M. Hersen, V. Van Hassett, & J. Matson (Eds.),Behavior therapy for the developmentally and physically disabled (pp. 57–77). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hewett, F. M. (1965). Teaching speech to an autistic child through operant conditioning.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 35, 927–936.Google Scholar
  11. Hollis, J. H., & Carrier, Q. K. (1978). Intervention stategies for nonspeech children. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.),Language intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ingram, D. (1976).Phonological disability in children. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Koegel, L. K., & Koegel, R. L. (1986). The effects of interspersed maintenance tasks on academic performance in a severe childhood stroke victim.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 425–430.Google Scholar
  14. Koegel, R. L., Dyer, K., & Bell, L. K. (1987). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children's social behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243–252.Google Scholar
  15. Koegel, R. L., & Egel, A. L. (1979). Motivating autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 418–426.Google Scholar
  16. Koegel, R. L., & Johnson, J. (in press). Motivating language use in autistic children. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: New perspectives on diagnosis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (1988). Generalized responsivity and pivotal behaviors. In R. H. Horner, G. Dunlap, & R. L. Koegel (Eds.),Generalization and maintenance: Lifestyle changes in applied settings (pp. 41–66). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  18. Koegel, R. L., & Mentis, M. (1985). Motivation in childhood autism: Can they or won't they?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 185–191.Google Scholar
  19. Koegel, R. L., O'Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children.Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 17, 187–200.Google Scholar
  20. Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1976). Identification of consistent responding to auditory stimuli by a functionally “deaf” autistic child.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 6, 147–155.Google Scholar
  21. Koegel, R. L., & Traphagen, J. (1982). Selection of initial words of speech training with nonverbal children. In R. L. Koegel, A. Rincover, & A. L. Egel (Eds.),Educating and Understanding Autistic Children (pp. 65–77). San Diego: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lovaas, O. I. (1977).The autistic child. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  23. Lovaas, O. I., Berberich, J. P., Perooff, B. F., & Schaeffer, B. (1966). Acquisition of imitative speech by schizophrenic children.Science, 151, 705–707.Google Scholar
  24. MacMillan, D. L. (1971). The problem of motivation in the education of the mentally retarded.Exceptional Children, 37, 579–586.Google Scholar
  25. MacMillan, D. L. (1975). Effect of experimental success and failure on the situational expectancy of EMR and nonretarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 90–95.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1978).Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Mittler, P. (1966). The psychological assessment of autistic children, In J. K. Wing (Ed.),Early childhood autism: Clinical, educational, and social aspects (pp. 145–158). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Moerk, E. (1972). Principles of interaction in language learning.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 229–257.Google Scholar
  29. Rutter, M. (1966). Prognosis: Psychotic children in adolescence and early adult life. In J. K. Wing (Ed.),Early childhood autism: Clinical, educational, and social aspects. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  30. Rutter, M. (1978). Diagnosis and definition of childhood autism.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 8, 139–161.Google Scholar
  31. Ritvo, E. R. & Freeman, B. J. (1978). National Society for Autistic Children definition of the syndrome of autism.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 34, 235–255.Google Scholar
  32. Schane, S. A. (1973).Generative phonology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Schumaker, J. B. & Sherman, J. A. (1978). Parent as intervention agent. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.),Language intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1962). Two “synthetic social relations.”Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 531–533.Google Scholar
  35. Sloane, H. N., & Macaulay, B. D. (1968).Operant procedures in remedial speech and language/training. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  36. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Koegel
    • 3
  • Mary O'Dell
    • 1
  • Glen Dunlap
    • 2
  1. 1.Rio School DistrictUSA
  2. 2.Marshall UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Speech and Hearing CenterUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara

Personalised recommendations