Using computer simulations to assesss hands-on science learning
Two methods of assessing student learning of a hands-on instructional unit are compared. One method involves manipulation of concrete materials, and the other method involves manipulation of icons on a computer to solve an electric circuits problem. Sixth-grade students in an inquiry-based science program completed both assessments separated by three weeks. Results indicated that although mean performance was the same for each method, individual student performance varied considerably. Implications for use of computer simulations as an alternative to hands-on assessment are discussed.
Key wordsScience assessment performance assessment computer assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baxter, G. P., and Shavelson, R. J. (1994). Performance assessments: Benchmarks and surrogates.International Journal of Educational Research 21(4): 279–298.Google Scholar
- Helgeson, S. L., and Kumar, D. D. (1993). A review of educational technology in science assessment.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 12(3/4): 227–243.Google Scholar
- Pine, J., Baxter, G. P., and Shavelson, R. J. (1991).Computer Simulations for Assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Shavelson, R. J., and Baxter, G. P. (1992). What we've learned about assessing hands-on science.Educational Leadership 49(8): 20–25.Google Scholar
- Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., and Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessments in science.Applied Measurement in Education 4(4): 347–362.Google Scholar
- Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., and Pine, J. (1992). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality.Educational Researcher 21(4): 22–27.Google Scholar