Broadband IF matching for quasioptical mixers

  • A. I. Harris
  • K. -F. Schuster
  • L. J. Tacconi
Article
Received:

Abstract

Everyone recognizes the need to drive symmetric quasioptical antennas in a symmetric way to maintain clean antenna patterns; in this note we report on the advantages of bringing out the IF in a symmetric (balanced) way as well. The main difference in IF circuits between waveguide and open structure mixers is that the quasioptical mixers are usually also open at IF wavelengths, so IF currents can flow on the outside of the mixer mounting structures. We measured these surface currents and their associated resonances on a scale model of our mixer block for a 690 GHz SIS mixer. Bringing the IF off the mixer with a balanced circuit solves the surface current problems, yielding a broad bandwidth with predictable impedances. We successfully tested an octave bandwidth IF matching circuit for open structure mixers that incorporates a commercial 180° hybrid at cryogenic temperatures. We also found that surface currents are not significant for corner cube mixers because they generate their own balancing currents.

Key words

Quasioptical mixers submillimeter radiometers radio astronomy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Eckart, A., Harris, A.I., and Wohlleben, R. 1988, “Scaled Model Measurements of the Sandwiched V-Antenna,”Int'l J. IR and mm Waves 9, 505.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Emerson and Cuming, Canton, MA.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bowman, D.F. 1961, ch. 31 in “Antenna Engineering Handbook,” ed. H. Jasik, McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bawer, R., and Wolfe, J.J. 1960, “A Printed Circuit Balun for Use with Spiral Antennas,”IRE Trans. MTT-8, 319.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Oltman, G. 1966, “The Compensated Balun,”IEEE Trans. MTT-14, 112.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Laughlin, G.J. 1976, “A New Impedance-Matched Wide-Band Balun and Magic Tee,”IEEE Trans. MTT-24, 135.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Phelan, H.R. 1970, “A Wide-Band Parallel-Connected Balun,”IEEE Trans. MTT-18, 259.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Duncan, J.W., and Minerva, V.P. 1960, “100∶1 Bandwidth Balun Transformer,”Proc. IRE 48, 156.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tzu-hung Chen et al. 1991, “Broadband Monolitic Passive Baluns and Monolithic Double-Balanced Mixer,”IEEE Trans. MTT-39, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Schiek, B., and Köhler, J. 1976, “An Improved Microstrip-to-Microslot Transition,”IEEE Trans. MTT-24, 231.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Mini-Circuits, Brookline, NY, model ZFSCJ-2-1-S.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Terman, F.E. 1943, “Radio Engineers' Handbook,” p. 53, McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M/A-Com, Control Components Division, Merrimack, NH, model 2031-6331-00.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Harris, A.I., Jaffe, D.T., Stutzki, J. and Genzel, R. 1987, “The UCB/MPE Cassegrain Submillimeter Heterodyne Spectrometer,”Int'l J. IR and mm Waves 8, 857.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. I. Harris
    • 1
  • K. -F. Schuster
    • 1
  • L. J. Tacconi
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische PhysikGarching bei MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations