Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 81–113 | Cite as

A cognitive theoretical approach to reading diagnostics

  • James M. Royer
  • Gale M. Sinatra
Article

Abstract

After a brief review of current reading diagnostic practices, the article presents a cognitive developmental theory and indicates how the theory can be used to identify potential sources of reading problems. Four criteria for a reading diagnostic system based on cognitive developmental theory are then identified: (1) the system must provide reliable and valid assessments, (2) performance on the diagnostic system must be consistent with cognitive developmental theory, (3) the diagnostic procedures must provide specific information about the nature of the reading difficulty the student is experiencing, and (4) diagnoses provided by the procedures must lead to prescriptive procedures that alleviate to a demonstrable degree the reading problems the student is experiencing. The Computer-based Academic Assessment System (CAAS) is then introduced, and evidence from three studies is used to examine the extent to which the CAAS system can satisfy the four requirements for a theory-based reading diagnostic system. The article closes with a discussion of the empirical evidence and with suggestions for future research.

Key Words

reading diagnostics dyslexia reading development cognitive development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron, P. G. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests?J. Learning Disab. 24(3): 178–186.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. J. (1990).Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R. (1983).The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. C., and Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension, In Pearson, P. D., Barr, R., and Kamil, M. (eds.),Handbook Reading Research, Longman, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Shallert, D. L., and Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse.Am. Educ. Res. J. 14: 367–381.Google Scholar
  6. Allington, R. L. (1984). Content coverage and contextual reading in reading groups.J. Reading Behav. 16: 85–96.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, L., and Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills in reading. In Pearson, P. D. (ed.),Handbook of Reading Research, Longman, New York, pp. 353–395.Google Scholar
  8. Ball, E. W. and Blachman, B. A. (1988). Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readiness.Ann. Dyslexia 38: 208–225.Google Scholar
  9. Bejar, I. I. (1984). Educational diagnostic assessment.J. Educ. Measurement 21(2): 175–189.Google Scholar
  10. Biemiller, A. (1977–1978). Relationship between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement.Reading Res. Quart. 13: 223–253.Google Scholar
  11. Bradley, L. (1988). Rhyme recognition and reading and spelling in young children. In Ellis, W. (ed.),Intimacy with Language: A Forgotten Basic in Teacher Education (2nd ed.), Orton Dyslexia Society, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  12. Bradley, L., and Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection.Nature 30: 419–421.Google Scholar
  13. Bradley, L., and Bryant, P. E. (1985).Rhyme and Reason in Reading and Spelling, University of Michigan Pres, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, A. L., and Campione, J.C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities.Am. Psychol. 41: 1059–1068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bryant, P. E., and Bradley, L. (1985).Children's Reading Difficulties, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Brickley, A. C., Ellington, B. J., and Brickley, R. T. (1970). The cloze procedure: A conspectus.J. Reading Behav. 2: 232–239.Google Scholar
  17. Carlisle, J. F. (1989a). The use of the Sentence Verification Technique in diagnostic assessment of listening and reading comprehension.Learning Disab. Res. 5: 33–44.Google Scholar
  18. Carlisle, J. F. (1989b). Diagnosing comprehension deficits through listening and reading.Ann. Dyslexia 39: 159–176.Google Scholar
  19. Carlisle, J. F. (1990). Diagnostic assessment of listening and reading comprehension. In Swanson, H. L., and Keogh, B. (eds.),Learning Disabilities: Theoretical and Research Issues, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Chabot, R. J., Petros, T. V., and McCord, G. (1983). Developmental and reading ability differences in accessing information form semantic memory.J. Exp. Child Psychol. 35: 128–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cisero, C. A., Royer, J. M., Marchant, H., and Wint, F. (1994).Diagnostic Identification of Dyslexic and Learning Disabled College Students Using the Computer-Based Academic Assessment System (CAAS). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  22. Cunningham, P. M. (1975–1976). Investigating a synthesized theory of mediated word identification.Reading Res. Quart. 11: 127–143.Google Scholar
  23. Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill.J. Educ. Psychol. 72: 656–669.Google Scholar
  24. DeSoto, J. L., and DeSoto, C. L. (1983). Relationship of reading achievement to verbal processing abilities.J. Educ. Psychol. 75: 116–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dewitt, P. A., Snyder, K., and Coressel, L. L. (1992).Comparing an Analogy and Phonics Approach to Word Recognition. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio.Google Scholar
  26. Doehring, D. G. (1976). Acquisition of rapid reading responses.Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 41 (2, of Serial No. 165).Google Scholar
  27. Durrell, D. D., and Catterson, J. H. (1980).Durrell Analysis of Reading of Reading Difficulties, Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In Barr, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., and Pearson, P. D. (eds.),Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2), Longman, New York, pp. 383–417.Google Scholar
  29. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L., and Treiman, R. (eds.),Reading Acquisition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 107–143.Google Scholar
  30. Fodor, J. A. (1983).The Modularity of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In Cooper, W. E., and E. Walker, (eds.),Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.Google Scholar
  32. Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M., and Rosebery, A. S. (1985a). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 1. Perceptual units training.Cognit. Instr. 2: 91–130.Google Scholar
  33. Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. W., and Rosebery, A. S. (1985b). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 2: Decoding and the use of context.Cognit. Instr. 2: 175–205.Google Scholar
  34. Gaskins, R. W., Gaskins, J. C., and Gaskins, I. W. (1991). A decoding program for poor readers—and the rest of the class, too!Language Arts 68: 213–225.Google Scholar
  35. Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing: A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics.Am. Psychol. 36: 923–936.Google Scholar
  36. Glass, G. (1986). Testing old, testing new: Schoolboy psychology and the allocation of intellectual resources. In Plake, B. S., and Witt, J. C. (eds.),The Future of Testing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar
  37. Goodman, Y. M., and Burke, C. L. (1972).Reading Miscue Inventory, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Gough, P. B., and Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability.Remedial Spec. Educ. 7(1): 6–10.Google Scholar
  39. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., and Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L., and Treiman, R. (eds.),Reading Acquisition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 55–48.Google Scholar
  40. Guthrie, J. T. (1973). Models of reading and reading disability.J. Educ. Psychol. 65: 9–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hall, J., and Humphreys, M. (1982). Research on specific learning disabilities: Deficits and remediation.Topics Learning Disab. 2: 68–78.Google Scholar
  42. Hogaboam, T. W., and Perfetti, C. A. (1978). Reading skill and the role of verbal experience in decoding.J. Educ. Psychol. 70: 717–729.Google Scholar
  43. Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C., and Lewis, J. (1975). What does it mean to be high verbal?Cognit. Psychol. 7: 194–227.Google Scholar
  44. Jackson, M. D., and McClelland, J. L. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed.J. Exp. Psychol. General 108: 151–181.Google Scholar
  45. Johnston, P. (1992).The Language of Assessment and the Assessment of Language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  46. Johnston, P. H. (1984). Assessment in reading. In Pearson, P. D. (ed.),Handbook of Reading Research, Longman, New York, pp. 147–182.Google Scholar
  47. LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognit. Psychol. 6: 293–332.Google Scholar
  48. Linn, R. L. (1986). Educational testing and assessment: Research needs and policy issues.Am. Psychol. 41: 1153–1160.Google Scholar
  49. Lundberg, I., Frost, J., and Peterson, O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children.Reading Res. Quart. 23: 263–284.Google Scholar
  50. Mestre, J. P., and Royer, J. M. (1991). Cultural and linguistic influences on Latino testing. In Keller, G., Beneen, J., and Magallan, R. (eds.),Assessment and Access: Hispanics in Higher Education, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 39–66.Google Scholar
  51. Myers, J. L. (1979).Fundamentals of Experimental Design (3rd Ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  52. Nagy, W. E., and Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English.Reading Res. Quart. 20: 233–253.Google Scholar
  53. Norusis, M. J. (1988).SPSS/PC + Advanced Statistics V2.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  54. Olson, R. K., and Wise, B. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback: An overview of the Colarado Remediation Project.Reading Writing, 4: 107–144.Google Scholar
  55. Palincsar, A. S., and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities.Cogn. Instr. 1: 117–175.Google Scholar
  56. Palmer, J., Macleod, C. M., Hunt, E., and Davidson, J. E. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading.J. Mem. Lang. 24: 59–88.Google Scholar
  57. Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., and Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension.J. Educ. Psychol. 76: 1239–1252.Google Scholar
  58. Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading Ability, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Perfetti, C. A. (1988). Verbal efficiency in reading ability. In Daneman, M., MacKinnon, G. E., and Waller, T. G. (eds.),Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, Academic Press, New York, pp. 109–143.Google Scholar
  60. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L., and Treiman, R. (eds.),Reading Acquisition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 145–174.Google Scholar
  61. Perfetti, C. A., and Hogaboam, T. W. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill.J. Educ. Psychol. 67: 461–469.Google Scholar
  62. Perfetti, C. A., and Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In Just, M., and Carpenter, P. (eds.),Cognitive Processes in Comprehension, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  63. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A. Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.Sci. Educ. 66: 211–227.Google Scholar
  64. Posner, M. I., Boies, S. J., Eichelman, W. H., and Taylor, R. L. (1969). Retention of physical and name codes of single letters.J. Exp. Psychol. Monogr. 79: 1–16.Google Scholar
  65. Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., and Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction.Elem. School J. 89: 301–342.Google Scholar
  66. Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. (1989).The Psychology of Reading, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  67. Roth, S. F., and Beck, I. L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs.Reading Res. Quart. 22: 197–218.Google Scholar
  68. Royer, J. M. (1985). Reading from the perspective of a biological metaphor.Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 10: 150–200.Google Scholar
  69. Royer, J. M. (1990). The Sentence Verification Technique: A new direction in the assessment of reading comprehension. In Legg, S. M., and Algina, J. (eds.),Cognitive Assessment of Language and Math Outcomes, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 144–191.Google Scholar
  70. Royer, J. M., and Carlo, M. S. (1991). Assessing the language acquisition progress of limited English proficient students: Problems and a new alternative.Appl. Measurement Educ. 4: 85–113.Google Scholar
  71. Royer, J. M., and Cunningham, D. J. (1981). On the theory and measurement of reading comprehension.Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 6: 187–216.Google Scholar
  72. Royer, J. M., Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, J. B., and Peterson, S. E. (1986). The sentence verification technique as a measure of listening and reading comprehension.Educ. Psychol. Res. 6: 299–314.Google Scholar
  73. Royer, J. M., Carlo, M. S., and Cisero, C. A. (1992). School-based uses for the Sentence Verification Technique of measuring listening and reading comprehension.Psychol. Test Bull 5: 5–19.Google Scholar
  74. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory. An integrated system for IBM PC compatible.Behav. Res. Meth. Instr. Comp. 20: 206–217.Google Scholar
  75. Schwartz, S. (1980).Measuring Reading Competence: A Theoretical-Prescriptive Approach, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Sinatra, G. M., and Royer, J. M. (1993). The development of cognitive component processing skills that support skilled reading.J. Educ. Psychol. 85: 509–519.Google Scholar
  77. Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., and Brewer, W. F. (eds.),Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 245–278.Google Scholar
  78. Stanovich, K. E. (1986a). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Res. Quart. 21: 360–407.Google Scholar
  79. Stanovich, K. E. (1986b). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In Torgesen, J., and Wong, B. (eds.),Psychological and Educational Perspectives on Learning Disabilities, Academic Press, New York, pp. 87–131.Google Scholar
  80. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader. The phonological-core variable-difference model.J. Learning Disab. 21(10): 590–604.Google Scholar
  81. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity,Dev. Rev. 10: 72–100.Google Scholar
  82. Stedman, L. C., and Kaestle, C. E. (1987). Literacy and reading performance in the United States from 1880 to the present.Reading Res. Quart. 22: 8–46.Google Scholar
  83. Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Testing and cognitive psychology.Am. Psychol. 36: 1181–1189.Google Scholar
  84. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)Consideration of context effects.J. Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 18: 645–659.Google Scholar
  85. Vinsonhaler, J. S., Weinshank, A. B., Wagner, C. C., and Polin, R. M. (1983). Diagnosing children with educational problems: Characteristics of reading and learning disabilities specialists, and classroom teachers.Reading Res. Quart. 28: 134–164.Google Scholar
  86. van Dijk, T. A., and Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  87. Wagstaff, J. M., and Sinatra, G. M. (1994).Promoting Efficient and Independent Word Recognition: A New Strategy for Readers and Writers, Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  88. Wade, S. E., Schraw, G., Buxton, W. M., and Hayes, M. T. (1993). Seduction of the strategic reader: Effects of interest on strategy and recall.Reading Res. Quart 28(2): 92–114.Google Scholar
  89. Walberg, H. J., and Tsai, S. (1983). Matthew effects in education.Am. Educ. Res. J. 20: 359–373.Google Scholar
  90. Wolf, M. (1984). Naming, reading, and the dyslexias: A longitudinal review.Ann. Dyslexia 34: 78–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Royer
    • 2
  • Gale M. Sinatra
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtahUtahUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst

Personalised recommendations