Etude expérimentale d'un écosystème sableux

II. Evolution des populations de bactéries et de méiofaune
  • S. Chamroux
  • G. Boucher
  • P. Bodin
Experimental Ecosystems

Experimental study on a sand ecosystem

II. Evolution of bacteria and meiofauna populations

Abstract

A multispecific closed-circuit sand ecosystem was fuelled by regular addition of soluble amino acids during 28 months (205 g C m−2 year−1). Bacteria and nematode densities undergo a similar evolution, divided into three main periods: the first 6 to 7 months (numerical decrease), from 6 to 7 to 20 months (numerical stability), after 20 months (numberical increase). Copepod densities are stable during the first seven months, then they exhibit an exponential increase until 14 to 15 month and, thereafler, a decrease. The inter-specific changes were followed for copepods and nematodes. One copepod species progressively overwhelms the fifteen others recorded. During 15 months, the nematodes specific diversity remains important. Although the number of rare species decrease progressively, the relative abundancy of the dominant species remains stable. After 15 month, the population changes according to a pattern of species succession.

Literature Cited

  1. Boucher, G., 1975. Nématodes des sables fins infralitoraux de la Pierre Noire (Manche Occidentale). I. Desmodorida. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (Zool.)195, 101–128.Google Scholar
  2. — 1976. Nématodes des sables fins infralittoraux de la Pierre Noire (Manche Occidentale). II. Chromadorida. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (Zool.)245, 25–61.Google Scholar
  3. — & Helléouët, M. N., 1977 Nématodes des sables fins infralittoraux de la Pierre Noire (Manche Occidentale). III. Araeolaimida et Monhysterida. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (Zool.)297, 85–122.Google Scholar
  4. —, & Chamroux, S., 1976. Bacteria and meiofauna in an experimental sand ecosystem. I. Material and preliminary results. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol.24, 237–249.Google Scholar
  5. Bovée, F. de, 1975. La nématofaune des vases autopolluées des Iles Kerguelen (Terres australes et antarctiques françaises). Cah. Biol. mar.15, 711–720.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S. & Williams, C. B., 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol.12, 42–58.Google Scholar
  7. Hairston, N. G., Allan, G. D., Colwell, R. K., Futuyama, D. J., Howell, J., Lubin, M. D., Mathias, J. & Vandermeer, J. H., 1968. The relationship between species diversity and stability: an experimental approach with protozoa and bacteria. Ecology49, 1091–1101.Google Scholar
  8. Heip, C. & Decraemer, W., 1974. The diversity of nematode communites in the southern North Sea. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.54, 251–255.Google Scholar
  9. Lang, K., 1965. Copepoda Harpacticoidea from the Californian coast. K. svenska vetensk. Akad. Handl.10 (2), 1–566.Google Scholar
  10. Lasker, R., Wells, J. B. J. & McIntyre, A. D., 1970. Growth, reproduction respiration and and carbon utilization of the sand-dwelling harpacticoid copepod,Asellopsis intermedia. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.50, 147–160.Google Scholar
  11. McIntyre, A. D., Munro, A. L. S. & Steele,J. H., 1970. Energy flow in a sand ecosystem. In: Marine Food chains. Ed. by, J. H. Steele, Univ. Carol. Press, Berkeley, 19–31.Google Scholar
  12. McNaughton, S. J., 1968. Structure and function in California grasslands. Ecology49, 962–972.Google Scholar
  13. Nicholson, A. J., 1954. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations Austr. J. Zool.2, 9–65.Google Scholar
  14. Por, F., 1964. Les Harpacticoïdes (Copepoda Crustacea) des fonds meubles de Skagerak. Cah. Biol. mar.5, 233–270.Google Scholar
  15. Vitiello, P., 1972. Peuplements de Nématodes marins des fonds envasés de Provence occidentale. Thèse, Univ. Aix-Marseille, 190 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Warwick, R. M. & Buchanan, J. B. 1970. The meiofaune off the coast of Northumberland. I. The structure of the Nematode population. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.,50 129–146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biologische Anstalt Helgoland 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Chamroux
    • 1
  • G. Boucher
    • 1
  • P. Bodin
    • 1
  1. 1.Station Biologique de RoscoffRoscoffFrance

Personalised recommendations