Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Successful and less-successful research performance of junior faculty

  • 140 Accesses

  • 18 Citations

Abstract

In academic medical centers, there is increasing concern about the diminishing supply of clinical investigators and the amount of clinical investigation being conducted. This study developed and evaluated an instrument designed to measure characteristics of a successful researcher. All assistant professor faculty in the tenure track at this research university were sent a two-page survey. Analyses revealed that 50 percent of the items significantly discriminated successful and less-successful researchers. A factor analysis of these items produced four stable factors: research activities, mentoring, local networks, and scholarly habits. A backward stepwise discriminant analysis revealed that only two of the four factors were needed to effectively identify successful researchers. These two factors were research activities and scholarly habits. The rate of correct classification of the two-factor equation was such that 92 percent of the successful researchers were correctly identified. Testing this instrument in other academic settings would help to determine its generalizability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Astin, H. S. (1984). Factors, academic scholarship and its rewards. In M. W. Steinkamp and M. L. Maehr (eds.),Women in Science (pp. 259–279). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  2. Bayer, A. E., and Dutton, J. (1977). Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists.Journal of Higher Education 48 (May/June): 259–282.

  3. Bentley, R. J., and Blackburn, R. T. (November 1990). Relationship of faculty publication performance with age, career age, and rank. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, OR.

  4. Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments.Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 204–213.

  5. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., and Hall, D. E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications.Sociology of Education 51: 132–141.

  6. Blackburn, R. T., Bieber, J. P., Lawrence, J. H., and Trauvetter, L. C. (1991a). Faculty at work: Focus on teaching.Research in Higher Education 32(4): 363–383.

  7. Blackburn, R. T., Bieber, J. P., Lawrence, J. H., and Trauvetter, L. C. (1991b). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship and service.Research in Higher Education 32(4): 385–413.

  8. Bland, C. J., and Ruffin, M. T. (1992). Characteristics of a productive research environment.Academic Medicine 67(9): 385–397.

  9. Bland, C. J., and Schmitz, C. J. (1986). Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development.Journal of Medical Education 61: 22–31.

  10. Braxton, J. M. (1983). Departmental colleagues and individual faculty publication productivity.The Review of Higher Education 6: 125–128.

  11. Clemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity.American Journal of Sociology 79: 409–419.

  12. Corcoran, M., and Clark, S. (1984). Professional socialization and contemporary career attitudes of three faculty generations.Research in Higher Education 30: 131–153.

  13. Creswell, J. (1985).Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIE Higher Education Report. Washington, DC.

  14. Creswell, J. (1990).The Academic Chairperson's Handbook. Lincoln and London: The University of Nebraska Press.

  15. Deming, W. E. (1986).Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachussetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

  16. Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance and reward in science and scholarship. In J. Smart (ed).Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 1. New York: Agathon Press.

  17. Jones, J. E., Preusz, G. C., and Finkelstein, S. N. (1989). Factors associated with clinical dental faculty research productivity.Journal of Dental Education 53(11): 638–645.

  18. Landino, R. A., and Owen, S. V. (1988). Self-efficacy in university faculty.Journal of Vocational Behavior 33: 1–14.

  19. Lawrence, J. H., and Blackburn, R. T. (1985). Faculty careers: Maturation, demographic and historical effects.Research in Higher Education 22(2): 135–154.

  20. Lee, T., Ognibene, F., and Schwartz, J. S. (1991). Correlates of external research support among respondents to the 1990 American Federation for Clinical Research Survey.Clinical Research 39(2): 135–143.

  21. Long, J. S., and McGinnis, R. (1981). Organizational context and scientific productivity.American Sociological Review 46: 422–442.

  22. McKeachie, W. J. (1983). Faculty as a renewable resource. In R. T. Baldwin and R. T. Blackburn (eds.).College Faculty: Versatile Human Resources in a Period of Constraint. New Directions for Institutional Research #40. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  23. Megel, M. (1987). Nursing scholars, writing dimensions, and productivity.Research in Higher Education 27(3): 226–243.

  24. Pelz, D. C., and Andrews, F. M. (1966).Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

  25. Perkoff, G. T. (1986). The research environment in family practice.Journal of Family Practice 21: 389–393.

  26. Rice, E. R., and Austin, A. E. (1990). Organizational impacts on faculty morale and motivation to teach. In P. Seldin (ed.).How Administrators Can Improve Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  27. Schoen, L., and Winocur, S. (1988). An investigation of the self-efficacy of male and female academics.Journal of Vocational Behavior 32: 307–320.

  28. Vaitukaitis, J. L. (1991). The future of clinical research.Clinical Research 39(2): 142–156.

  29. Wyngaarden, J. B. (1979). The clinical investigator as an endangered species.New England Journal of Medicine 301(23): 1254–1259.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Dr. Francine P. Hekelman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hekelman, F.P., Zyzanski, S.J. & Flocke, S.A. Successful and less-successful research performance of junior faculty. Res High Educ 36, 235–255 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207790

Download citation

Keywords

  • Discriminant Analysis
  • Medical Center
  • Research Performance
  • Assistant Professor
  • Clinical Investigation