Conclusion
Both Schutz and Gurwitsch describe reality as having a manifold character: Schutz speaks of “multiple realities” and Gurwitsch of “orders of existence”. Both hold that one realm of reality has a privileged status compared to the others: common everyday experience. However, in spite of this apparent convergence in their views, a closer reading of their various works reveal the important difference in what they understand under “common everyday experience”.
For Schutz, it is the world of social action, characterized by him as “paramount reality” because of the constitutive processes of the experiences of time, space, sociality and meaning involved in action. For Gurwitsch, the realm of common everyday experience represents the counterpart and the origin of the constructed realm of science: therein lies its status of “paramount reality”. But what it really refers to is not ordinary experience, as most of his statements suggest, but pre-predicative experience, wherefrom the categories of the natural sciences, namely space and time, originate. Gurwitsch speaks of this pre-predicative experience, which he also calls primordial experience, as being essentially perceptual experience. However, he limits perceptual experience to sensory perception, leaving out the symbolic, social and action-related components of perception and becomes thus inconsistent with his adherence to the dismissal of the constancy hypothesis in his field theory of consciousness. The dismissal of the constancy hypothesis implies the recognition of the appresentational structures involving symbols, action and Others as inherent components of every perception. Schutz disagrees with Gurwitsch's reduction of the life-world Erlebnisse to sensory perception and this issue becomes the core of their debate on the phenomenon of “paramount reality”.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Embree, L. (Ed.) (1972).Life-world and consciousness: Essays for Aron Gurwitsch. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Embree, L. (1977). Everyday social relevancy in Gurwitsch and Schutz.Annals of Phenomenological Sociology 1.
Embree, L. (Ed.) (1984).Essays in memory of Aron Gurwitsch. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
Grathoff, R. (Ed.) (1989).Philosophers in exile. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (1943). Outline of a projected book to be entitled Phenomenology of perception. In L. Embree (Ed.),Essays in memory of Aron Gurwitsch. Washington DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
Gurwitsch, A. (1964).The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (1966).Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (1970). Problems of the life-world. In M. Natanson (Ed.),Phenomenology and social reality: Essays in memory of Alfred Schutz. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Gurwitsch, A. (1974).Phenomenology and the theory of science. Ed. L. Embree. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (1979).Human encounters in the social world. Ed. A. Métraux. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Husserl, E. (1970).The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
James, W. (1890/1950).The principles of psychology, Vol. II. New York: Dover Publication.
Kassab, E.S. (1988).Social action, social personality and social reality in the early works of Schutz and Parsons: A critical study of the Schutz-Parsons correspondence. Unpublished dissertation, Université de Fribourg, Switzerland.
Kersten, F. (1972). The constancy hypothesis in the social sciences. In L. Embree (Ed.),Life-world and consciousness: Essays for Aron Gurwitsch. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Marx, W. (1972). The life-world and Gurwitsch's “orders of existence.” In L. Embree (Ed.),Life-world and consciousness: Essays for Aron Gurwitsch. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Natanson, M. (Ed.) (1970).Phenomenology and social reality: Essays in memory of Alfred Schutz. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1936–1937). Das Problem der Personalität in der Sozialwelt. Unpublished manuscript, Social Sciences Archives, Universität Konstanz.
Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. In A. Schutz,Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. Ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1955). Symbol, reality and society. In A. Schutz,Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. Ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1962).Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. Ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1984).Strukturen der Lebenswelt. II. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Srubar, I. (1988).Die Genese der pragmatischen Lebenswelttheorie von Alfred Schutz und ihr anthropologischer Hintergrund. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kassab, E.S. “Paramount reality” in Schutz and Gurwitsch. Hum Stud 14, 181–198 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205602
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205602