Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Critical Comments on Phelps' ”Second Golden Rule Essay”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    American Economic Review, Vol. LI, No. 4., September 1961.

  2. 2

    Under these assumptions there are an infinite number of balanced growth paths which can be reached in a finite period of time and strictly followed thereafter.

  3. 3

    American Economic Review, Vol. IV, No. 4, September 1965.

  4. 4

    Which had independently been derived by a number of other writers, among others by Carl C. v. Weizsäcker and T. W. Swan.

  5. 5

    See footnote 10, p. 809 of op. cit. under 3.

  6. 6

    See op. cit. under 3 p. 806

  7. 7

    This case is, of course, trival. For non trivial cases, see the author: „Balanced Growth under Factor Augmenting Technological Progress”, Publication No. 32/66, Netherlands Economic Institute, January 1966.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inagaki, M. Critical Comments on Phelps' ”Second Golden Rule Essay”. De Economist 114, 534–539 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02200134

Download citation