Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 135–144

Phylogenetic analyses of complete cytochromeb genes of the order Carnivora with particular emphasis on the Caniformia

  • Christina Ledje
  • Ulfur Arnason
Articles

Abstract

The evolutionary relationships among the Carnivora were studied in a phylogenetic analysis based on the complete mitochondrial cytochromeb gene. The study, which addressed primarily the relationships among the Caniformia, included 4 feliform and 26 caniform species, with 9 pinnipeds. The analysis identified five caniform clades: Canidae, Ailuridae (with the monotypic lesser panda), Musteloidea (Mustelidae+Procyonidae), Ursidae (including the giant panda), and Pinnipedia. The closest relatives of the Pinnipedia among terrestrial caniforms were not identified conclusively. Our analysis shows that the skunks are only distantly related to remaining mustelids (Mustelidae sensu stricto) and that the family Mustelidae, including the skunks, is paraphyletic. The relationship among the five caniform clades was unresolved, suggesting an evolutionary separation within a relatively short period of time. Based on distance values, we propose that this primary diversification took place ∼45 million years ago.

Key words

Carnivora Caniformia Feliformia Canidae Ailuridae Musteloidea Ursidae Pinnipedia Cytochromeb Mitochondrial DNA mtDNA Phylogeny 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anbinder EM (1980) The karyology and evolution of pinnipeds. Akademia Nauk, Moscow, USSRGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson S, De Bruijn MHL, Coulson AR, Eperon IC, Sanger F, Young IG (1982) Complete sequence of bovine mitochondrial DNA. Conserved features of the mammalian mitochondrial genome. J Mol Biol 156:683–717Google Scholar
  3. Arnason U (1974) Comparative chromosome studies in Pinnipedia. Hereditas 76:179–226Google Scholar
  4. Arnason U (1977) The relationship between the four principal pinniped karyotypes. Hereditas 87:227–242Google Scholar
  5. Arnason U, Bodin K, Gullberg A, Ledje C, Mouchaty S (1995) A molecular view of pinniped relationships with particular emphasis on the true seals. J Mol Evol 40:78–85Google Scholar
  6. Arnason U, Gullberg A, Widegren B (1991) The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the fin whale,Balaenoptera physalus. J Mol Evol 33:556–568Google Scholar
  7. Arnason U, Gullberg A (1994) Relationship of baleen whales established by cytochromeb gene sequence comparison. Nature 367:726–728Google Scholar
  8. Arnason U, Gullberg A (1996) Sequence analyses of the mitochondrial cytochromeb gene identify five primary evolutionary lineages of extant cetaceans. Mol Biol Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Arnason U, Gullberg A, Johnsson E, Ledje C (1993) The nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial DNA molecule of the grey seal,Halichoerus grypus, and a comparison with mitochondrial sequences of other true seals. J Mol Evol 37:323–330Google Scholar
  10. Arnason U, Johnsson E (1992) The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the harbor seal,Phoca vitulina. J Mol Evol 34:493–505Google Scholar
  11. Arnason U, Ledje C (1993) The use of highly repetitive DNA for resolving cetacean and pinniped phylogenies. In: Szalay FS, Novacek MJ, McKenna MC (eds) Mammal phylogeny, placentals, vol 2. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 74–80Google Scholar
  12. Arnason U, Widegren B (1986) Pinniped phylogeny enlightened by molecular hybridizations using highly repetitive DNA. Mol Biol Evol 3:356–365Google Scholar
  13. Barnes LG (1979) Fossil enaliarctine pinnipeds (Mammalia: Otariidae) from Pyramid Hill, Kern county, California. Contrib Sci Nat Hist Museum Los Angeles 318:1–41Google Scholar
  14. Berta A, Ray CE, Wyss AR (1989) Skeleton of the oldest known pinnipedEnaliarctos mealsi. Science 244:60–62Google Scholar
  15. Bryant HN, Russell AP, Fitch WD (1993) Phylogenetic relationships within the extant Mustelidae (Carnivora): appraisal of the cladistic status of the Simpsonian subfamilies. Zool J Linn Soc 108:301–334Google Scholar
  16. Cao Y, Adachi J, Janke A, Pääbo S, Hasegawa M (1994) Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. J Mol Evol 39:519–527Google Scholar
  17. Czelusniak J, Goodman M, Koop BF, Tagle DA, Shoshani J, Braunitzer G, Kleinschmidt TK, de Jong WW, Matsuda G (1990) Perspectives from amino acid and nucleotide sequences on cladistic relationships among higher taxa of Eutheria. In: Genoways HH (ed) Current mammalogy, vol 2. Plenum Publishing, New York, pp 545–572Google Scholar
  18. de Jong WW (1986) Protein sequence evidence for monophyly of the carnivore families Procyonidae and Mustelidae. Mol Biol Evol 3:276–281Google Scholar
  19. de Jong WW, Leunissen JAM, Wistow GJ (1993) Eye lens crystallins and the phylogeny of placental orders: evidence for a macroscelid-paenungulate clade? In: Szalay FS, Novacek MJ, McKenna MC (eds) Mammal phylogeny, placentals, vol 2. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 5–12Google Scholar
  20. Dragoo JW, Bradley RD, Honeycutt RL, Templeton JW (1993) Phylogenetic relationship among the skunks: a molecular perspective. J Mammal Evol 1:255–267Google Scholar
  21. Fay FH, Rausch VR, Feltz ET (1967) Cytogenetic comparison of some pinnipeds (Mammalia: Eutheria). Can J Zool 45:773–778Google Scholar
  22. Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP, 3.5c ed. Department of Genetics SK-50, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  23. Flynn JJ, Neff NA, Tedford RH (1988) Phylogeny of the carnivora. In: Benton MJ (ed) The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, mammals, vol 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 73–115Google Scholar
  24. Honeycutt RL, Adkins RM (1993) Higher level systematics of eutherian mammals: an assessment of molecular characters and phylogenetic hypotheses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:279–305Google Scholar
  25. Hunt RM Jr, Tedford RH (1993) Phylogenetic relationships within the aeluroid carnivora and implications of their temporal and geographic distribution. In: Szalay FS, Novacek MJ, McKenna MC (eds) Mammal phylogeny, placentals, vol 2. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 53–73Google Scholar
  26. Irwin DM, Arnason U (1994) Cytochromeb gene of marine mammals: phylogeny and evolution. J Mammal Evol 2:37–55Google Scholar
  27. Irwin DM, Kocher TD, Wilson AC (1991) Evolution of the cytochromeb gene of mammals. J Mol Evol 32:128–144Google Scholar
  28. Janczewski DN, Modi WS, Stephens JC, O'Brien SJ (1995) Molecular evolution of mitochondrial 12S RNA and cytochromeb sequences in the pantherine lineage of Felidae. Mol Biol Evol 12:690–707Google Scholar
  29. Janke A, Feldmaier-Fuchs G, Thomas WK, von Haeseler A, Pääbo S (1994) The marsupial mitochondrial genome and the evolution of placental mammals. Genetics 137:243–256Google Scholar
  30. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Krettek A, Gullberg A, Arnason U (1995) Sequence analysis of the complete mitochondrial DNA molecule of the hedgehog,Erinaceus europaeus, and the phylogenetic position of the Lipotyphla. J Mol Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Lento GM, Hickson RE, Chambers GK, Penny D (1995) Use of spectral analysis to test hypotheses on the origin of pinnipeds. Mol Biol Evol 12:28–52Google Scholar
  33. Li W-H, Gouy M, Sharp PM, O'hUigin C, Yang Y-W (1990) Molecular phylogeny of Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primates, Artiodactyla, and Carnivora and molecular clocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6703–6707Google Scholar
  34. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (1992) MacClade. Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, 3.02 ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 1–398Google Scholar
  35. Martin LD (1989) Fossil history of the terrestrial Carnivora. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behaviour, ecology, and evolution. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 536–568Google Scholar
  36. O'Brien SJ, Nash WG, Wildt DE, Bush ME, Benveniste RE (1985) A molecular solution to the riddle of the giant panda's phylogeny. Nature 317:140–144Google Scholar
  37. Repenning CA, Ray CE, Grigorescu D (1979) Pinniped biogeography. In: Gray J, Boucot AJ (eds) Historical biogeography, plate tectonics, and the changing environment. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 357–369Google Scholar
  38. Repenning CA, Tedford RH (1977) Otarioid seals of the Neogene. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425Google Scholar
  40. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2 ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarich VM (1969) Pinniped phylogeny. Syst Zool 18:416–422Google Scholar
  42. Sarich VM (1973) The giant panda is a bear. Nature 245:218–220Google Scholar
  43. Shields GF, Kocher TD (1991) Phylogenetic relationships of North American ursids based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 45:218–221Google Scholar
  44. Simpson GG (1945) The principles of classification and a classification of the mammals. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist, pp 1–350Google Scholar
  45. Stanley HF, Kadwell M, Wheeler JC (1994) Molecular evolution of the family Camelidae: a mitochondrial DNA study. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 256:1–6Google Scholar
  46. Swofford DL (1993) PAUP, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, 3.1.1 ed. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  47. Tedford RH (1976) Relationship of pinnipeds to other carnivores (Mammalia). Syst Zool 25:363–374Google Scholar
  48. Veron G, Catzeflis FM (1993) Phylogenetic relationships of the endemic malagasy carnivore Cryptoprocta ferox (Aeluroidea): DNA/DNA hybridizatione xperiments. J Mammal Evol 1:169–185Google Scholar
  49. Vrana PB, Milinkovitch MC, Powell JR, Wheeler WC (1994) Higher level relationships of the arctoid carnivora based on sequence data and “total evidence”, Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:47–58Google Scholar
  50. Wayne RK, Benveniste RE, Janczewski DN, O'Brien SJ (1989) Molecular and biochemical evolution of the Carnivora. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 465–494Google Scholar
  51. Wozencraft WC (1989) The phylogeny of the recent carnivora. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 495–535Google Scholar
  52. Wurster-Hill DH, Centerwall WR (1982) The interrelationships of chromosome banding patterns in canids, mustelids, hyena, and felids. Cytogenet Cell Genet 34:178–192Google Scholar
  53. Wyss AR (1987) The walrus auditory region and the monophyly of pinnipeds. Am Mus Novit 2871:1–13Google Scholar
  54. Wyss AR (1988) Evidence from flipper structure for a single origin of pinnipeds, Nature 334:427–428Google Scholar
  55. Wyss AR, Flynn JJ (1993) A phylogenetic analysis and definition of the Carnivora. In: Szalay FS, Novacek MJ, McKenna MC (eds) Mammal phylogeny, placentals, vol 2. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 32–52Google Scholar
  56. Xu X, Arnason U (1994) The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the horse,Equus caballus: extensive heteroplasmy of the control region. Gene 148:357–362Google Scholar
  57. Zhang Y-P, Ryder OA (1993) Mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Arctoidea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:9557–9561Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Ledje
    • 1
  • Ulfur Arnason
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics, Division of Evolutionary Molecular SystematicsUniversity of LundLundSweden

Personalised recommendations