Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 91–96

Horizontal gene transfer contributes to the wide distribution and evolution of type II restriction-modification systems

  • Albert Jeltsch
  • Alfred Pingoud
Articles

Abstract

Restriction modification (RM) systems serve to protect bacteria against bacteriophages. They comprise a restriction endonuclease activity that specifically cleaves DNA and a corresponding methyltransferase activity that specifically methylates the DNA, thereby protecting it from cleavage. Such systems are very common in bacteria. To find out whether the widespread distribution of RM systems is due to horizontal gene transfer, we have compared the codon usages of 29 type II RM systems with the average codon usage of their respective bacterial hosts. Pronounced deviations in codon usage were found in six cases:EcoRI,EcoRV,KpnI,SinI,SmaI, andTthHB81. They are interpreted as evidence for horizontal gene transfer in these cases. As the methodology is expected to detect only one-fourth to one-third of all horizontal gene transfer events, this result implies that horizontal gene transfer had a considerable influence on the distribution and evolution of RM systems. In all of these six cases the codon usage deviations of the restriction enzyme genes are much more pronounced than those of the methyltransferase genes. This result suggests that in these cases horizontal gene transfer had occurred sequentially with the gene for the methyltransferase being first acquired by the cell. This can be explained by the fact that an active restriction endonuclease is highly toxic in cells whose DNA is not protected from cleavage by a corresponding methyltransferase.

Key words

Restriction enzyme Modification enzyme Restriction endonuclease DNA methyltransferase Codon usage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggarwal AK (1995) Structure and function of restriction endonucleases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:11–19Google Scholar
  2. Athanasiadis A, Vlassi M, Kotsifaki D, Tucker PA, Wilson KG, Kokkinidis M (1994) Crystal structure ofPvuII endonuclease reveals extensive structural homology toEcoRV. Nature Struct Biol 1:469–475Google Scholar
  3. Barany F, Danzitz M, Zebala J, Mayer A (1992) Cloning and sequencing of genes encoding theTthHB8I restriction and modification enzymes: comparison with the isoschizomericTaqI enzymes. Gene 112:3–12Google Scholar
  4. Bickle TA, Krüger DH (1993) Biology of DNA restriction. Microbiol Rev 57:434–450Google Scholar
  5. Cheng X (1995) DNA modification by methyltransferases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:4–10Google Scholar
  6. Cheng X, Balendiran K, Schildkraut I, Anderson JE (1994) Structure ofPvuII endonuclease with cognate DNA. EMBO J 13:3927–3935Google Scholar
  7. Cheng X, Kumar S, Posfai J, Pflugrath JW, Roberts, RJ (1993) Crystal structure of theHhaI DNA methyltransferase complexed with S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Cell 74:299–307Google Scholar
  8. Heitman J (1993) On the origins, structures and functions of restriction-modification enzymes. In: Setlow JK (ed) Genetic engineering, Vol 15. Plenum Press, New York, pp 57–108Google Scholar
  9. Hornby DP (1993) DNA methyltransferases (EC 2.1.1.72 and EC 2.1.1.73). Methods Mol Biol 16:201–211Google Scholar
  10. Jeltsch A, Kröger M, Pingoud A (1995) On the evolutionary relationship among type II restriction and modification enzymes. Gene 160:7–16Google Scholar
  11. Kapfer W, Walter J, Trautner TA (1991) Cloning, characterization and evolution of theBsuFI restriction endonuclease gene ofBacillus subtilis and purification of the enzyme. Nucleic Acids Res 19:6457–6463Google Scholar
  12. Klimasauskas S, Kumar S, Roberts RJ, Cheng X (1994)HhaI methyltransferase flips its target base out of the DNA helix. Cell 76:357–369Google Scholar
  13. Labahn J, Granzin J, Schluckebier G, Robinson DP, Jack WE, Schildkraut I, Saenger W (1994) Three-dimensional structure of the adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase M ·TaqI in complex with the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10957–10961Google Scholar
  14. Matic I, Rayssiguier C, Radman M (1995) Interspecies gene exchange in bacteria: the role of SOS and mismatch repair systems in evolution of species. Cell 80:507–515Google Scholar
  15. Newman M, Strzelecka T, Dorner LF, Schildkraut I, Aggarwal AK (1994) Structure of restriction endonucleaseBamHI and its relationship toEcoRI. Nature 368:660–664Google Scholar
  16. Noyer-Weidner M, Trautner TA (1993) Methylation of DNA in prokaryotes. In: Jost JP, Saluz HP (eds) DNA methylation: molecular biology and biological significance, Birkhäser Verlag, Basel, pp 40–108Google Scholar
  17. Noyer-Weidner M, Walter J, Teschüren P-A, Chai S, Trautner TA (1994) M.φ3TII: a new monospecific DNA (cytosine-C5) methyltransferase with pronounced amino acid sequence similarity to a family of adenine-N6-DNA-methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res 22:5517–5523Google Scholar
  18. Olsen GJ, Woese CR, Overbeck R (1994) The winds of (evolutionary) change: Breathing new life into microbiology. J Bacteriol 176:1–6Google Scholar
  19. Piekarowicz A, Stein DC (1995) Purification and characterization of a new DNA methyltransferase fromNeisseria gonorrhoeae. Gene 157:101–102Google Scholar
  20. Pingoud A, Alves J, Geiger R (1993) Restriction enzymes. In: Burrell MM (ed) Methods in molecular biology, Vol 16, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 107–200Google Scholar
  21. Roberts RJ, Halford SE (1993) Type II restriction endonucleases. In: Linn SM, Lloyd RS, Roberts RJ (eds) Nucleases, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 35–88Google Scholar
  22. Roberts RJ, Macelis D (1994) REBASE-restriction enzymes and methylases. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3628–3639Google Scholar
  23. Rosenberg JM (1991) Structure and function of restriction endonucleases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1:104–113Google Scholar
  24. Schluckebier G, O'Gara M, Saenger W, Cheng X (1995) Universal catalytic domain structure of AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases. J Mol Biol 247:16–20Google Scholar
  25. Stephenson FH, Ballard BT, Boyer HW, Rosenberg JM, Greene PJ (1989) Comparison of the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of theRsrI andEcoRI restriction endonucleases. Gene 85:1–13Google Scholar
  26. Szomolonyi E, Kiss A, Venetianer P (1980) Cloning the modification methylase gene ofBaccillus sphaericus R inEscherichia coli. Gene 10:219–225Google Scholar
  27. Venclovas C, Timinskas A, Siksnys V (1994) Five stranded β-sheet sandwiched with two α-helices—a structural link between restriction endonucleasesEcoRI andEcoRV. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 20:279–282Google Scholar
  28. Wada K, Wada Y, Doi H, Ishibashi F, Gojobori T, Ikemura T (1991) Codon usage tabulated from the GenBank genetic sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 19[Suppl]:1981–1986Google Scholar
  29. Wilson GG (1991) Organization of restriction-modification systems. Nucleic Acids Res 19:2539–2566Google Scholar
  30. Wilson GG, Murray NE (1991) Restriction and modification systems. Annu Rev Genet 25:585–627Google Scholar
  31. Winkler FK, Banner DW, Oefner C, Tsernoglou D, Brown RS, Heathman SP, Bryan, RK, Martin, PD, Petratos K, Wilson KS (1993) The crystal structure ofEcoRV endonuclease and of its complexes with cognate and non-cognate DNA fragments. EMBO J 12:1781–1795Google Scholar
  32. Whittam TS, Ake SE (1993) Genetic polymorphisms and recombination in natural populations ofEscherichia coli. In: Takahata N, Clarke AG (eds) Mechanisms of molecular evolution. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 223–245Google Scholar
  33. Xu GL, Kapfer W, Walter J, Trautner TA (1992)BsuBI-an isospecific restriction and modification system ofPstI: characterization of theBsuBI genes and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 20:6517–6523Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Jeltsch
    • 1
  • Alfred Pingoud
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Biochemie, FB 15Justus-Liebig Universität GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations