Social Justice Research

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 145–170

Mother teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices

  • Jim Sidanius
  • Felicia Pratto
  • Stacey Sinclair
  • Colette van Laar
Article

Abstract

We replicated and extended earlier work showing the connection between social dominance orientation and the perceived attractiveness of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating careers using data from two large and independent samples of UCLA students. Consistent with expectations, the data from both studies showed that the greater the students' level of social dominance orientation, the more attractive hierarchy-enhancing careers such as criminal prosecutor, police officer, and FBI agent were perceived to be. Similarly, the greater the students' social dominance orientation, the less attractive they found hierarchy-attenuating careers such as public defender, civil rights lawyer, and human rights advocate. These conclusions held even after controlling for the effects of socioeconomic status and political conservatism. Canonical correlation analysis disclosed that the attractiveness of these career paths within the general domain of law made only one, bipolar and unidimensional projection within social dominance space. The nature of this bipolar dimension reproduced the hypothesized distinction between hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating social roles. Theoretical implications of the results are discussed.

Key words

career choice group dominance discrimination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkin, S. (1980). Discrimination and arbitrariness in capital punishment: An analysis of Post-Furman murder cases in Dade County, Florida, 1973–1976.Stanford Law Rev. 33: 75–101.Google Scholar
  2. Baldus, D., Woodworth, G., and Pulaski, C. (1990).Equal Justice and the Death Penalty: A Legal Empirical Analysis, Northwestern University Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, A. (1985). Some distribution patterns for the Georgia death sentence.UC Davis Law Rev. 18: 1327–1374.Google Scholar
  4. Bensing, R. C., and Schroeder, O., Jr. (1960).Homicide in an Urban Community, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  5. Bienen, L., Alan, N., Denno, D. W., Allison, P. D., and Mills, D. L. (1988, Fall). The reimposition of capital punishment in New Jersey: The role of prosecutorial discretion.Rutgers Law Rev. pp. 27–372.Google Scholar
  6. Bowers, W. (1983). The pervasiveness of arbitrariness and discrimination under post-Furman capital statues.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 74: 1067–1100.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, W., & Pierce, G. (1980, October). Arbitrariness and discrimination under post-Furman capital statues.Crime Delinquency, pp. 563–635.Google Scholar
  8. Bullock, H. A. (1961). Significance of the racial factor in the length of prison sentences.J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 52: 411–417.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, A. J., Cochrane, R. (1977). An examination of some elements of the personality of police officers and their implications.J. Police Sci. Admin. 5: 441–450.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, H. M., and Sutton, M. S. (1974). The development of attitudes as a function of police roles.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1: 113–115.Google Scholar
  11. Castberg, A. D. (1971). The ethnic factor in criminal sentencing.Western Polit. Quart. 24: 425–437.Google Scholar
  12. Cauchon, D. (1993, November 10). Cocaine sentencing disparities weighed.USA Today, p. 10A.Google Scholar
  13. Christopher, W. A., Argellas, J. A., Barnes, W. R., Estrada, L. F., Kantor, M., Mosk, R. M., Ordin, A. S., Slaughter, J. B., and Tranquada, R. E. (1991). Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, S. H., and Koch, G. G. (1976). The influence of income and other factors on whether criminal defendants go to prison.Law Soc. 11(1): 57–92.Google Scholar
  15. Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: a new view of an old construct.Polit. Psychol. 10: 63–84.Google Scholar
  16. Duffy, E. (1940). A critical review of investigations employing the Allport-Vernon Study to values and other tests of evaluative attitude.Psychol. Bull. 37: 597–61.Google Scholar
  17. Endler, N. S., and Magnusson, D. (1976). Personality and person by situation interactions. In Endler, N. S., and Magnusson, D. (eds.),Interactional Psychology and Personality, Wiley, New York, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  18. Fehr, L. (1982).The Disproportionate Representation of Racial Minorities in the Criminal Justice System of Washington State, Washington Council On Crime, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  19. Fielding, N. G. (1986). Evaluating the role of training in police socialization: A British example. Special issue: Law and psychology.J. Commun. Psychol. 14: 319–330.Google Scholar
  20. Foley, L. (1987). Florida after the Furman decisions: The effect of extralegal factors on the processing of capital offense cases.Behav. Sci. Law 5: 457–465.Google Scholar
  21. Foley, L., and Powell, R. (1982). The discretion of prosecutors, judges, and juries in capital cases.Crim. Justice Rev. 7: 16–22.Google Scholar
  22. General Accounting Office. (1990). Death penalty sentencing: Research indicates pattern of racial disparities. United States General Accounting Office, Report to Senate and House Committees on the Judiciary (GAO/GGD-90-57).Google Scholar
  23. Garber, S., Klepper, S., and Nagin, D. (1982).The Role of Extralegal Factors in Determining Criminal Case Disposition: Toward More Reliable Statistical Inference, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  24. Garfinkel, H. (1949). Research note on inter- and intra- homicides.Soc. Forces 27: 370–381.Google Scholar
  25. Green, E. (1964). Inter- and intra- racial crime relative to sentencing.J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 60: 306–313.Google Scholar
  26. Green, E. (1970). Race, social status, and criminal arrest.Am. Sociol. Rev. 35: 476–490.Google Scholar
  27. Gross, S., and Mauro, R. (1984). Patterns of death: An analysis of racial disparities in capital sentencing and homicide victimization.Stanford Law Rev. 37: 27–153.Google Scholar
  28. Gross, S., and Mauro, R. (1989).Death and Discrimination: Racial Disparities in Capital Sentencing, Northwestern University Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  29. Grzelak, J. (1984). Social justice and control.Polish Psychol. Bull. 15: 227–233.Google Scholar
  30. Hagan, J. (1974). Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: an assessment of sociological viewpoint.Law Soc. Rev. 8.Google Scholar
  31. Hazer, J. T., and Alvares, K. M. (1981). Police work values during organizational entry and assimilation.J. Appl. Psychol. 66: 12–18.Google Scholar
  32. Holland, J. L. (1966).The Psychology of Vocational Choice, Blaidell, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Holsendolph, E. (1979). Blacks can't bank on conventional loans.Black Enterprise 9: 19–21.Google Scholar
  34. Jackson, P. I., and Carroll, L. (1981). Race and the war on crime: the sociopolitical determinants of municipal police expenditures in 90 non-southern U.S. cities.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 290–305.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, G. B. (1941). The Negro and crime.Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 271: 93–104.Google Scholar
  36. Kiel, T., and Vito, G. (1989). Race, homicide severity, and application of the death penalty: A consideration of the Barnett Scale.Criminology 27: 511–535.Google Scholar
  37. Kleck, G. (1981). Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 783–805.Google Scholar
  38. Klepper, S., Nagin, D., and Tierney, L. (1982).Discrimination In The Criminal Justice System: Critical Appraisal Of The Literature And Suggestions For Future Research, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  39. Lefkowitz, J. (1977). Industrial-organizational psychology and the police.Am. Psychol. 32: 346–364.Google Scholar
  40. Leitner, D. W., and Sedlacek, W. E. (1976). Characteristics of successful campus police officers.J. Coll. Stud. Pers. 17: 304–308.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis, P., Mannle, H., and Vetter, H. (1979). A post-Furman profile of Florida condemned—A question of discrimination in terms of race of the victim and a comment on Spenkelink v. Wainwright.Stetson Law Rev. 9: 1–45.Google Scholar
  42. McGahan, P. (1984). Police imagery of the urban environment.Can. Police Coll. J. 8: 107–153.Google Scholar
  43. Merina, V. (1993, December, 1). The slide from cop to criminal: The were once the elite of the war on drugs. They busted bad guys, won awards and seized millions in illicit money.Los Angeles Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
  44. Nakell, B., and Hardy, K. (1987).The Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  45. Paternoster, R. (1983). Race of the victim and location of the crime: The decision to seek the death penalty in South Carolina.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 74: 754–785.Google Scholar
  46. Paternoster, R., and Kazyaka, A. M. (1988). The administration of the death penalty in South Carolina: Experiences over the first few years.South Carolina Law Rev. 39: 245–414.Google Scholar
  47. Petersilia, J. (1983).Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System (R-2947-Nic), Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  48. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., and Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation as an intergroup construct.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 741–763.Google Scholar
  49. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., and Siers, B. (in press). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach.Br. J. Soc. Psychol.Google Scholar
  50. Radelet, M. (1981). Racial characteristics and the imposition of the death penalty.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 918–927.Google Scholar
  51. Radelet, M., and Pierce, G. (1985). Race and prosecutorial discretion in homicide cases.Law Soc. Rev. 19: 587–621.Google Scholar
  52. Radelet, M., and Vandiver, M. (1983). The Florida Supreme Court and death penalty appeals.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 74: 913–926.Google Scholar
  53. Riedel, M. (1976). Discrimination in the imposition of the death penalty: A comparison of the characteristics of offenders sentenced pre-Furman and Post-Furman.Temple Law Quart. 49: 261–287.Google Scholar
  54. Sarri, R. C. (1986). Gender and race differences in criminal justice processing.Special Issue: Women and the Law. Women's-Studies-International-Forum, pp. 89–99.Google Scholar
  55. Sidanius, J. (1988). Race and sentence severity: The case of American justice.J. Black Stud. 18: 273–281.Google Scholar
  56. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In Iyengar, S., and McGuire, W. (eds.),Explorations in Political Psychology, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 183–219.Google Scholar
  57. Sidanius, J., Liu, J., Pratto, F., and Shaw, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy-attenuators and hierarchy-enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 24: 338–366.Google Scholar
  58. Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In Sniderman, P., and Tetlock, P. (eds.),Prejudice, Politics, and the American Dilemma, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 173–211.Google Scholar
  59. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., and Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance, orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 998–1011.Google Scholar
  60. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Martin, M., and Stallworth L. (1991). Consensual racism, and career track: Some implications of social dominance theory.Polit. Psychol. 12: 691–721.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, D. M. (1987). Patterns of discrimination in assessments of the death penalty: The case of Louisiana.J. Crim. Justice 15: 279–286.Google Scholar
  62. Sweeny, L., and Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies.Behav. Sci. Law 10: 179–195.Google Scholar
  63. Teahan, J. E. (1975). A longitudinal study of attitude shifts among Black and White police officers.J. Soc. Issues 31: 47–56.Google Scholar
  64. Teahan, J. E., Adams, K. M., and Podany, E. C. (1980). A comparison of the value structure of British and U.S. police.Int. J. Soc. Psychiat. 26: 246–254.Google Scholar
  65. Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1991). Procedural processes and legal institutions. In Vermunt, R., and Steensma, H. (eds.),Social Justice in Human Relations: Societal and Psychological Consequences of Justice and Injustice. Critical Issues in Social Justice, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
  66. Van-Maanen, J. (1975). Police organization: A longitudinal examination of job attitude in an urban police department.Admin. Sci. Quart. 20: 207–228.Google Scholar
  67. Vito, G., and Keil, T. (1988). Capital sentencing in Kentucky: An analysis of the factors influencing decision making in the post-Gregg period.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 79: 483–508.Google Scholar
  68. Willick, D. H., Gehlker, G., and Watts, A. M. (1975). Social class as a factor affecting judicial disposition: defendants charged with criminal homosexual acts.Criminology 13: 57–77.Google Scholar
  69. Zeisel, H. (1981). Race bias in the administration of the death penalty: The Florida experience.Harvard Law Rev. 95: 454–468.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Sidanius
    • 1
  • Felicia Pratto
    • 2
  • Stacey Sinclair
    • 1
  • Colette van Laar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California-Los AnglesLos Angeles
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations