Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 377–384 | Cite as

Effect of zinc supply on growth of three species of Eucalyptus seedlings and wheat

  • B. Dell
  • S. A. Wilson
Article

Summary

Effects of zinc supply on shoot and root dry weight, root length, zinc concentrations and carbonic anhydrase activity were measured in 52 day old seedlings ofEucalyptus maculata, E. marginata, E. patens and wheat grown in a zinc deficient soil in the glasshouse.

Symptoms of zinc deficiency in the eucalyptus and wheat appeared within 20 to 35 days. Eucalypt seedlings had short internodes and small necrotic leaves, reduced dry weight of shoots and roots, root length and zinc concentrations in young leaves; the measurable level of leaf carbonic anhydrase activity decreased to zero. Similar responses also occurred in wheat.

The level of zinc fertilizer required for normal growth of Eucalyptus seedlings is therefore likely to be similar to that used for wheat and other agricultural crops.

Key words

Carbonic anhydrase Dry matter Eucalyptus maculata E. marginata E. patens Seedlings Symptoms Triticum aestivum Zinc 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bar-Akiva A and Lavon R 1969 Carbonic anhydrase activity as an indicator of zinc deficiency in citrus leaves. J. Hortic. Sci. 44, 359–362.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bar-Akiva A, Gotfried A and Lavon R 1971 A comparison of various means of testing the effectiveness of foliar sprays for correcting zinc deficiencies in citrus trees. J. Hortic. Sci. 46, 397–401.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergmann W 1983 Ernährungsstörungen bei Kulturpflanzen. Entstehung und Diagnose. Veb Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burville G H 1965 Plant nutrition in Western Australia. Bulletin No. 3342 Western Australian Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlton W M 1955 Some effects of zinc deficiency on the anatomy of the tomato. Bot. Gaz. 116, 52–64.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapman H D 1966 Zinc.In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils. Ed. H D Chapman. pp 484–499. Univ. of Calif. Davis.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaudry F M and Loneragan J F 1970 Effects of nitrogen, copper, and zinc fertilizers on the copper and zinc nutrition of wheat plants. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 21, 865–879.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chude V O and Obigbesan G O 1983 Effect of zinc application on the dry matter yield, uptake and distribution of zinc and other micronutrients in cocoa (Thesbroma cacao). Comm. Soil Sci. Pl. Analysis 14, 989–1004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dell B, Loneragan J F and Plaskett D 1983 The phosphorus response of Eucalyptus seedlings grown in a pallid zone clay treated with three levels of lime. Aust. J. Bot. 31, 231–238.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunne T C and Throssell G L 1948 Response of wheat to copper and zinc at Dongara. J. Dep. Agric. West. Aust. (2) 25, 43–46.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson T S and Leece D R 1981 Estimation of physiologically active zinc in maize by biochemical assay. Plant and Soil 63, 395–406.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hewitt E J 1966 Sand and Water Culture Methods used in the Study of Plant Nutrition. Commonwealth Bur. Hortic. Plantation Crops, Tech. Commun. No. 22 (2nd Ed.).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hill J, Robson A D and Loneragan J F 1978 The effects of copper and nitrogen supply on the retranslocation of copper in four cultivars of wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29, 925–939.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoagland D R, Chandler W H and Hibbard P L 1936 Littleleaf or rosette of fruit trees. V. Effect of zinc on the growth of plants of various types in controlled soil and water culture experments. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 33, 131–141.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kessell S L and Stoate T N 1938 Pine nutrition. West. Aust. For. Dep. Perth. Bull. 50, 45 pp.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nasan A 1950 Effect of zinc deficiency on the synthesis of tryptophan by Neurospora extract. Science 112, 111–112.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okhi K 1975 Lower and upper critical zinc levels in relation to cotton growth and development. Physiol. Plant. 35, 96–100.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pittman H A and Owen R C 1936 Anthracnose and mottle leaf of citrus in Western Australia. J. Dep. Agric. West. Aust. (2) 13, 137–142.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reed H S 1938 Cytology of leaves affected with little-leaf. Am. J. Bot. 25, 174–186.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reuter D J, Loneragan J F, Robson A D and Plaskett D 1982 Zinc in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L. cv. Seaton Park). I. Effects of zinc supply on distribution of zinc and dry weight among plant parts. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 33, 989–999.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riceman D S and Jones G B 1958 Distribution of zinc and copper in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) grown in culture solutions supplied with graduated amounts of zinc. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 73–122.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rickli E E, Ghazanfar S A S, Gibbons B H and Edsall J T 1964 Carbonic anhydrase from human erythrocytes. Preparation and properties of two enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 239, 1065–1078.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rossell R A and Ulrich A 1964 Critical zinc concentrations and leaf minerals of sugar beet leaves. Soil Sci. 97, 152–167.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salami U A and Kenefick D G 1970 Stimulation of growth in zinc deficient corn seedlings by the addition of tryptophan. Crop Sci. 10, 291–294.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith M E and Bayliss N S 1942 The necessity of zinc forPinus radiata. Plant Physiol. 17, 303–310.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Snir I 1983 Carbonic anhydrase activity as an indicator of Zn deficiency in pecan leaves. Plant and Soil 74, 287–289.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thorne W 1957 Zinc deficiency and its control. Adv. Agron. 9, 31–65.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Toms J 1958 The use of copper and zinc in the cereal-growing districts of Western Australia. J. Dep. Agric. West. Aust. (3) 7, 197–203.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tsui C 1948 The role of zinc in auxin synthesis in the tomato plant. Am. J. Bot. 35, 172–179.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waygood E R and Clendenning K A 1950 Carbonic anhydrase in green plants. Can. J. Res. Sect. C 28, 673–689.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wood J G and Sibley P M 1952 Carbonic anhydrase acitivity in plants in relation to zinc content. Aust. J. Sci. Res. B. 5, 244–255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Dell
    • 1
  • S. A. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental and Life SciencesMurdoch UniversityMurdoch

Personalised recommendations