Behavior Genetics

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 349–356 | Cite as

A multivariate genetic analysis of sensation seeking

  • Judith R. Koopmans
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
  • Andrew C. Heath
  • Lorenz J. P. van Doornen


The genetic architecture of sensation seeking was analyzed in 1591 adolescent twin pairs. Individual differences in sensation seeking were best explained by a simple additive genetic model. Between 48 and 63% of the total variance in sensation seeking subscales was attributable to genetic factors. There were no sex differences in the magnitude of the genetic and environmental effects. The different dimensions of sensation seeking were moderately correlated. The strongest correlations were between the subscales Thrill and Adventure Seeking and Experience Seeking (r=0.4) and between Boredom Susceptibility and Disinhibition (r=0.4 in males,r=0.5 in females). A triangular decomposition showed that the correlations between the sensation seeking subscales were induced mainly by correlated genetic factors and, to a smaller extent, by correlated unique environmental factors. The genetic and environmental correlation structures differed between males and females. For females, higher genetic correlations for Experience Seeking with Boredom Susceptibility and Disinhibition and higher correlations among the unique environmental factors were found. There was no evidence that sex-specific genes influenced sensation seeking behavior in males and females.

Key words

Sensation seeking adolescent twins multivariate genetic analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boomsma, D. I., and Molenaar, P. C. M. (1986). Using LISREL to analyze genetic and environmental covariances structure.Behav. Genet. 19:5–7.Google Scholar
  2. Boomsma, D. I., Kaptein, A., Kempen, H. J. M., Gevers-Leuven, J. A., and Princen, H. M. G. (1993). Lipoprotein (a): Relation to other risk factors and genetic heritability. Results from a Dutch parent-twin study.Atherosclerosis 99:23–33.Google Scholar
  3. Boomsma, D. I., Koopmans, J. R., van Doornen, L. J. P., and Orlebeke, J. F. (1994). Genetic and social influences on starting to smoke: A study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents.Addiction 89:219–226.Google Scholar
  4. Eaves, L. J., Eysenck, H. J., and Martin, N. G. (1989).Genes, Culture and Personality: An Empirical Approach, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. Eysenck, S., and Zuckerman, M. (1978). The relationship between sensation-seeking and Eysenck's dimensions of personality.Br. J. Psychol. 69:483–487.Google Scholar
  6. Eysenck, H. J. (1983). A biometrical-genetical analysis of impulsive and sensation seeking behavior. In Zuckerman, M. (ed.),Biological Bases of Sensation Seeking, Impulsivity and Anxiety, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  7. Feij, J. A., and van Zuilen, R. W. (1984).De spanningsbehoeftelijst (SBL), Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. Feij, J. A., van Zuilen, R. W., and Gazendam, A. (1982). The development of a Dutch sensation seeking questionnaire: de Spanningsbehoeftelijst.Gedrag-Tijdschrift Psychol. 10:364–383.Google Scholar
  9. Fulker, D. W., Eysenck, S. B. G., and Zuckerman, M. (1980). A genetic and environmental analysis of sensation seeking.J. Res. Personal. 14:261–281.Google Scholar
  10. Goldsmith, H. H. (1991). A zygosity questionnaire for young twins: A research note.Behav. Genet. 21:257–269.Google Scholar
  11. Haapsalo, J. (1990). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Zuckerman's Sensation Seeking Scale (form V) in Finland: Age differences.Person. Individ. Diff. 11:503–508.Google Scholar
  12. Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1986).PRESLI: A Preprocessor for LISREL, National Educational Resources, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Koopmans, J. R., van Doornen, L. J. P. and Boomsma, D. I. (1994). Smoking and sports participation. In Goldbourt, U., De Faire, U., and Berg, K. (eds.),Genetic Factors in Coronary Heart Disease, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994, pp. 217–235.Google Scholar
  14. Loehlin, J. C. (1992).Genes and Environment in Personality Development. Individual Differences and Development Series, Vol. 2. Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  15. Loehlin, J. C. (1993). What has behavior genetics told us about the nature of personality? In Bouchard, T. J., and Propping, P. (eds.),Twins as a Tool of Behavioral Genetics, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 109–119.Google Scholar
  16. Loehlin, J. C., and Nichols, R. K. (1976).Heredity, Environment and Personality. A Study of 850 Sets of Twins, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  17. Magnus, P., Berg, K., and Nance, W. E. (1983). Predicting zygosity in Norwegian twin pairs born in 1915–1960.Clin. Genet. 24:103–112.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, N. G., and Eaves, L. J. (1977). The genetic analysis of covariance structure.Heredity 18:79–95.Google Scholar
  19. Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1979). The gentical relationship of impulsiveness and sensation seeking to Eysenck's personality dimensions.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 28:197–210.Google Scholar
  20. Neale, M. C. (1993).Statistical Modeling with Mx, Box 710, Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA 23298-0710.Google Scholar
  21. Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992).Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families (NATO ASI Series D: Behavioral and Social Sciences, Vol. 67), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  22. Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics (1994).Vademecum of Health Statistics of the Netherlands, 1994, SDU, The Hague, p. 69.Google Scholar
  23. Plomin, R., and Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from one another?Behav. Brain Sci. 10:1–60.Google Scholar
  24. Resnick, S. M., Gottesman, I. I., and McGue, M. (1993). Sensation seeking in opposite sex twins: An effect of prenatal hormones?Behav. Genet. 23:323–329.Google Scholar
  25. Tas, R. F. J. (1990). Meerlingen in Nederland, 1900–1988 (Multiple births in the Netherlands, 1900–1988).CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) Maandstatistiek Bevolking 4:12–23, 30–31.Google Scholar
  26. van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., de Geus, J. C. N., and Boomsma, D. I. (1994). Individual differences in P300 amplitude: A genetic study in adolescent twins (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  27. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 36:45–52.Google Scholar
  28. Zuckerman, M. (1974). The sensation seeking motive. In Maher, B. (ed.),Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York, pp. 79–148.Google Scholar
  29. Zuckerman, M. (1979).Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  30. Zuckerman, M. (1984). Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait.Behav. Brain Sci. 7:413–471.Google Scholar
  31. Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S., and Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age and sex comparisons.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46:139–149.Google Scholar
  32. Zuckerman, M., Buchsbaum, M. S., and Murphy, L. (1980). Sensation seeking and its biological correlates.Psychol. Bull. 88:187–214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith R. Koopmans
    • 1
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
    • 1
  • Andrew C. Heath
    • 2
  • Lorenz J. P. van Doornen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychonomicsVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations