The interference of light in pharmacotherapy
- 13 Downloads
Abstract
Although human photobiology is not yet studied very extensively, some responses to light such as the sunburn syndrome and the formation of vitamin D3 are wellknown. These processes indicate a profound influence of light on the human body. It is therefore remarkable that within pharmaceutical sciences so little attention has been paid to a possible interference of drugs in this subtle balance between light and the human body. After dealing with some photochemical and photobiological facts, drugs are reviewed of which adverse and beneficial effects in combination with light are reported by dermatologists. The research data which give an explanation of these effects on molecular level, although being scarce, allow the conclusion that light is an important factor in the research of drug action. Deeper insight into this factor can lead to a maximum of the wanted pharmacological activity with a minimum of side effects caused by light but also to the design of phototherapeutic drugs. The article concludes with an example of research which demonstrates the usefulness of taking light into account as an environmental factor in drug research.
Keywords
Nitrazepam Norethisterone Neonatal Jaundice PUVA Therapy Urocanic AcidPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bakri, A., andG. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen (1981) Part of a Ph.D. thesis to be published.Google Scholar
- Bland, J. (1976)J. Chem. Educ. 53, 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clayton, R. K. (1971)Light and living matter, Vol. 2. Mac-Graw-Hill, New York, ch. 5.Google Scholar
- Cornelissen, P. J. G. (1980) Ph.D. thesis, Leiden.Google Scholar
- Cornelissen, P. J. G., andG. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen (1979)Photochem. Photobiol. 30, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cornelissen, P. J. G., andG. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen (1980)Pharm. Weekblad Sci. Ed. 2, 39–48.Google Scholar
- Cornelissen, P. J. G., andG. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen (1981)Pharm. Weekblad Sci. Ed. 3, 96–105.Google Scholar
- Cornelissen, P. J. G., G. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegou-Wen andK. W. Gerritsma (1979)Int. J. Pharm. 3, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cornelissen, P. J. G., G. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen andG. R. Mohn (1981)Photochem. Photobiol., in press.Google Scholar
- Emmett, E. A. (1979)Photochem. Photobiol. 30, 429–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Epstein, J. H. (1977) In:Science of photobiology (Smith, K. C., Ed.). Plenum Press, New York, ch. 7.Google Scholar
- Epstein, J. H. (1979)New Engl. J. Med. 300, 852–853.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Everett, M. A. (1966)Photochem. Photobiol. 5, 533–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fitzpatrick, T. B., M. A. Pathak, L. C. Harber, M. Seiji andA. Kukita (1974) In:Sunlight and man (Fitzpatrick, T. B.,et al., Eds.). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, ch. 1.Google Scholar
- Foote, C. S. (1976) In:Free Radicals Biol. (Pryor, W. A., Ed.). Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giese, A. C. (1976) In:Living with our sun's ultraviolet rays. Plenum Press, New York, ch. 3 and ch. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gutter, B., W. T. Spek andH. S. Rosenkranz (1977a)Cancer Res. 37, 112–114;Ibidem (1977b)Mut. Res. 44, 177–182.Google Scholar
- Jarratt, M. (1976)Int. J. Dermatol. 15, 317–325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, B. E. (1974)Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 67, 871.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jose, J. G. (1979)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 469–472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Khan, U. A. (1976)J. Phys. Chem. 80, 2219–2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Langner, A., H. Wolska, M. A. Chorlzelska andM. Pawinska (1975)J. Invest. Dermatol. 64, 279–280.Google Scholar
- Ljunggren, B., andH. Möller (1977)J. Invest. Dermatol. 68, 313–317;Ibidem (1978)Acta Dermato-Venereol. 58, 125–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magnus, I. A. (1976)Dermatological photobiology. Blackwell, London, ch. 16.Google Scholar
- Mccann, J., E. Choi, E. Yamasaki andB. N. Ames (1975)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 35–39.Google Scholar
- Mol, N. J. De (1980)Involvement of molecular singlet oxygen in the photosensitizing action of furocoumarins. Ph.D. thesis, Leiden.Google Scholar
- Mol, N. J. De, andG. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen (1979)Photochem. Photobiol. 30, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mol, N. J. De, andG. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen (1981)Photochem. Photobiol. 33, 815–820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mol, N. J. De, G. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen andB. Van Beele (1981a)Photochem. Photobiol., in press.Google Scholar
- Mol, N. J. De, G. M. J. Beijersbergen Van Henegouwen, G. R. Mohn andP. M. Van Kleef (1981b)Mut. Res. 82, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moore, D. E. (1977)J. Pharm. Sci. 66, 1282–1284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Musajo, L., andG. Rodighiero (1972) In:Photophysiology (Giese, A. C., Ed.), Vol. VII. Academic Press, New York, ch. 5.Google Scholar
- Parrish, J. A., T. B. Fitzpatrick, C. Shea andM. A. Pathak (1976)Arch. Dermatol. 112, 1531–1534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal, I., E. Ben-Hur, A. Prager andE. Riklis (1978)Photochem. Photobiol. 28, 591–594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sedée, A. G. J. (1981) Part of an Ph.D. thesis to be published.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. C. (1977) In:Science of Photobiology (Smith, K. C., Ed.) Plenum Press, New York, ch. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stern, R. S. (1979)New Engl. J. Med. 300, 809–813.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Theodoridis, A., D. Tsamboas, C. Sivenas andJ. Capetanakis (1976)Acta Dermato-Venereol. 56, 253–256.Google Scholar