De Economist

, Volume 114, Issue 11–12, pp 617–652 | Cite as

Het Internationale Monetaire Fonds en het internationale monetaire stelsel

  • W. F. Duisenberg
Article
  • 17 Downloads

The international monetary fund and the international monetary system

Summary

Between 1947 and 1966 the I.M.F. has come to play a role of increasing importance. After a favorable start in the early years there followed a period of relative inactivity, but in 1956 the pace quickened again and activity has been quickening since that date. The watershed of 1956 arose because circumstances at that time called for a contribution to the system of international payments that the Fund was uniquely equipped to make. The Fund responded to the challenge and was able to do so partly because of the preparatory work that had been put in hand during the preceding years.

In the author's view, the development of the international reserves position offers a new challenge to the international monetary system and one which the Fund is in a position to try to meet. For years the rate of growth of international reserves has lagged behind the growth of imbalances in international payments, for whose financing these reserves are required. With traditional sources of reserves drying up, new sources need to be found if a lack of reserves is not to threaten the growth of international trade and thus of national economic expansion. Discussions on how the stock of world reserves might be increased have been going on for several years and the rising „temperature” of the discussions in recent months seems to indicate that the time for decision may be coming closer. Although additional conditional reserves would be well suited to perform the greater part of the job to be done, current international opinion places the main emphasis on arrangements for the creation of unconditional liquidity. In complete accordance with Article I of the Fund's Articles of Agreement — where it is said that the purposes of the Fund are the promotion of international monetary co-operation and the facilitation of the expansion of balanced growth of international trade —the Managing Director of the Fund has offered for discussion two variants of a plan to increase international reserves. The plan incorporates new techniques but these would be operated through the Fund and are thus backed by twenty years of experience in such matters.

All aspects of the work of the IMF are in one way or other related to the phenomenon called international liquidity. This paper, however, deliberately omits references to aspects of the FUnd's work whose connection with international liquidity is indirect, for instance, the provision of technical assistance or the regular consultations with member countries.

In Section 1 of the paper the discussion of international liquidity is placed in its proper historical perspective. The nature of international liquidity is then described, followed by an outline of the contributions that the Fund has made to it. This is followed by a description of the Fund's position and policies as they have developed over the years and a quantitative look at the results of the changes.

The position of reserves is then discussed mainly in terms of the argument used in the 1966Annual Report in its discussions of the future demand for reserves and the degree to which this demand will be met from current sources of reserves.

The Fund's contribution to the discussion on the adequacy of international liquidity is dealt with by referring to studies published in 1953 and 1958 and theAnnual Reports of recent years.

Finally, the types of reserves that might be created are discussed, followed by an outline of the proposals put forward by the Managing Director of the IMF. These proposals relate to the creation of new quasiautomatic drawing rights in the Fund and of reserve units. The common aspects of these proposals are discussed together, but the aspects in which they differ are treated separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 2.
    Volkenbond,International Currency Experience, Princeton, 1944, p. 28.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Volkenbond,Interim Report of the Gold Delegation, Genève, 1930, pp. 90 e.v.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    International Monetary Fund,Articles of Agreement, Article 1, (Purposes), (V).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    De aanhaling is uit de herdruk in S. E. Harris (ed.),The New Economics, New York, 1947, pp. 323–341, inz. p. 326.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Articles of Agreement, Art. VIII, lid 5 (c).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    J. J. Polak, „The Report of the International Monetary Fund”,American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), Vol. LV, mei 1965, p. 161.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    J. M. Keynes,The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Londen, 1936, p. 240.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1964, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    J. M. Fleming, „International Liquidity: Ends and Means”,IMF Staff Papers, Vol. VIII, no. 3, december 1961, p. 439.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    J. J. Polak, A.E.R., mei 1965, p. 160; I.M.F.,Annual Report 1965, p. 14.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions of the Executive Directors and Selected Documents, derde uitgave, Washington, D.C., 1965, p. 54 (beslissing no. 71–2 van 26 september 1946); zie ook p. 627 van dit artikel.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Articles of Agreement, Art. V, lid 3a; van deze bepaling kan ontheffing worden verleend, hetgeen in de praktijk slechts tweemaal is gebeurd; de eerste maal gebeurde het door toepassing van het beleid inzake Compensatory Financing (vgl. p. 647) en in het tweede geval was het slechts gedurende een overbruggingsperiode, om technische redenen, van enkele maanden.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions, p. 19.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Aan Nederlandse vertalingen van de Engelse benamingen van de bestuursorganen van het I.M.F. moet geen juridische betekenis worden gehecht.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions, pp. 21–24.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions, p. 21.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    I.M.F., p. 23.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Aan vertalingen in het Nederlands van Engelse termen uit de „Fondspraktijk” moet geen juridische betekenis worden gehecht.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    I.M.F.,International Reserves and Liquidity, Washington, D.C., 1958, pp. 81–83.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Vergelijk ook tabel 2, p. 634.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions, p. 54.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1962, p. 33.Google Scholar
  24. 26.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1963, p. 40.Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions, p. 49.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    De termen „voorwaardelijk” versus „onvoorwaardelijk” zijn voor het eerst gebruikt door J. M. Fleming, in „The Fund and International Liquidity”,I.M.F. Staff Papers, Vol. XI, nr. 2, juli 1961, p. 178.Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    J. M. Fleming,The International Monetary Fund (Its Form and Functions), Washington, D.C., 1964, pp. 39e.v.Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    J. M. Fleming,The I.M.F., p. 35.Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    Zie P. P. Schweitzer, „Address to the Annual Meeting of the International Monetary Fund,”Press Release, 26 september 1966, p. 1.Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    Voor een gedetailleerd verslag raadplege men J. M. Fleming, „Effects of Various Types of Fund Reserve Creation on Fund Liquidity,”I.F.M. Staff Papers, Vol. XII, nr. 2, juli 1965, pp. 163–188.Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    I.M.F.,Summary Proceedings Annual Meeting 1965, p. 30.Google Scholar
  32. 34.
    I.M.F.,International Reserves and Liquidity, Washington, D.C., 1958, p. 70.Google Scholar
  33. 35.
    I.M.F.,Enlargement of Fund Resources Through Increase in Quotas, Washington, D.C., 1958, p. 11.Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    I.M.F.,Enlargements of Fund Resources Through Increases in Quotas, Washington, D.C., 1958, p. 6.Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1964, p. 35.Google Scholar
  36. 39.
    I.M.F.,International Financial Statistics (verschillende jaren) enAnnual Report 1966.Google Scholar
  37. 42.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, p. 130.Google Scholar
  38. 43.
    J. M. Fleming, „Effects of Various Types of Fund Reserve Creation on Fund Liquidity”,I.M.F. Stall Papers, Vol. XII, nr. 2, juli 1965, p. 160.Google Scholar
  39. 45.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, tabel 1, p. 12.Google Scholar
  40. 46.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, p. 12.Google Scholar
  41. 47.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, p. 14.Google Scholar
  42. 48.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, pp. 112–115. (De produktie in de Sowjetlanden en in de Chinese Volksrepubliek zijn hierbij niet inbegrepen).Google Scholar
  43. 49.
    I.M.F., „The Adequacy of Monetary Reserves”,I.M.F. Staff Papers, Vol. III, nr. 2, oktober 1953, pp. 181–227.Google Scholar
  44. 50.
    I.M.F.,International Reserves and International Liquidity, Washington, D.C., 1958.Google Scholar
  45. 51.
    I.M.F.,Staff Papers, 1953, p. 217.Google Scholar
  46. 52.
    I.M.F.,Staff Papers, 1953, p. 188.Google Scholar
  47. 54.
    I.M.F.,International Reserves and Liquidity, p. 2.Google Scholar
  48. 55.
    I.M.F.,International Reserves and Liquidity, p. 93.Google Scholar
  49. 56.
  50. 57.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1964, p. 29.Google Scholar
  51. 58.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, p. 14.Google Scholar
  52. 59.
    Zie I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, p. 12.Google Scholar
  53. 60.
    Dit aspect van de toekomstige behoefte aan internationale liquiditeit is bestudeerd door Werkgroep III van hetEconomic Policy Committee van de Organisatie voor Economische Samenwerking en Ontwikkeling. Zie: O.E.C.D.,The Balance of Payments Adjustment Process, Parijs, 1966.Google Scholar
  54. 61.
    Zie bv.: Groep van Tien,Communiqué of Ministers and Governors, 's-Gravenhage, 1966, par. 4.Google Scholar
  55. 62.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, tabel 2, p. 13.Google Scholar
  56. 63.
    P. P. Schweitzer, „Address to the Annual Meeting of the International Monetary Fund”,Press Release, 26 September 1966, p. 3.Google Scholar
  57. 64.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1964, p. 26.Google Scholar
  58. 65.
    Cursivering van ons.Google Scholar
  59. 66.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1965, p. 15.Google Scholar
  60. 67.
    Groep van Tien,Report of Deputies, 's-Gravenhage, juli 1966, p. 5.Google Scholar
  61. 68.
    Groep van Tien,Report, p. 18.Google Scholar
  62. 69.
    Zie I.M.F.,Compensatory Financing of Export Fluetuations (A Second Report), Washington, D.C., 1966. De faciliteit bestaat uit extratrekkingsrechten op het Fonds van tweemaal 25 procent van de quota voor landen, die een terugval in uitvoerontvangsten ervaren door omstandigheden buiten hun toedoen, bv. als gevolg van een plotselinge daling van wereldmarktprijzen voor een belangrijk uitvoerprodukt of door een misoogst.Google Scholar
  63. 70.
    I.M.F.,Annual Report 1966, p. 17.Google Scholar
  64. 71.
    Groep van Tien,Report of Deputies, p. 9.Google Scholar
  65. 72.
    Groep van Tien,Communiqué, par. 4.Google Scholar
  66. 73.
    Groep van Tien,Communiqué, par. 6B.Google Scholar
  67. 74.
    Groep van Tien,Report of Deputies, p. 16.Google Scholar
  68. 75.
    Vergelijk J. M. Fleming, „Effects of Various Types of Fund Reserve Creation on Fund Liquidity”,I.M.F. Staff Pappers, Vol. XII, nr. 2, juli 1965, p. 167.Google Scholar
  69. 76.
    I.M.F.,Selected Decisions, pp. 36–39:Selection of Currencies to be Drawn.Google Scholar
  70. 77.
    P. P. Schweitzer, „Developments in the World Monetary System”, rede voor de Federatie van Duitse Industrieën, Kronberg (Taunus), Bondsrepubliek Duitsland, 25 april 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© De Erven F. Bohn N.V. 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. F. Duisenberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations