The concept of major depression

I. Descriptive comparison of six competing operational definitions including ICD-10 and DSM-III-R
  • Michael Philipp
  • Wolfgang Maier
  • Cynthia D. Delmo
Original Articles

Summary

All operationalized diagnostic systems contain a diagnostic category, which corresponds to the concept of major depression. Yet, these corresponding definitions are not identical. Up to now, no comprehensive comparisons of the competing diagnoses have been published. We will therefore present a series of studies, describing six different operational definitions of major depression according to their content and construction and empirically comparing them in large inpatient and outpatient samples. This first paper presents a descriptive comparison of the definitions given in the Feighner Diagnostic Criteria, the Research Diagnostic Criteria, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition and third edition, revised, and in two developmental drafts of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for research (draft April 1987–187; draft April 1989–189). The descriptive comparison will demonstrate that there are many similarities, especially concerning the symptom-criteria of major depression. Classificatory relevance could only be assumed for those differences found for cut-offs, for time criteria and especially for exclusion criteria. Whether these differences are negligible and whether patients classified by different diagnostic systems are really comparable will be examined in subsequent publications.

Key words

Major depression Operational diagnosis ICD-10 DSM-III-R 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn (DSM-III). APA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and Mental Disorders, 3rd edn, revised (DSM-III-R). APA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Berner P, Gabriel E, Katschnig H, Kieffer W, Koehler K, Lenz G, Simhandl C (1983) Diagnostic criteria for schizophrenic and affective psychoses. World Psychiatric Association, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassidy WL, Flanagan N, Spellman M, Cohen M (1957) Clinical observation in manic depressive disease: a quantitative study of 100 manic depressive patients and 50 medically sick controls. J Am Med Ass 164:1535–1546Google Scholar
  5. Feighner JP (1981) Nosology of primary affective disorders and application to clinical research. Acta Psychiatr Scand 63 [Suppl 190]:29–41Google Scholar
  6. Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff RA, Winokur G, Munoz R (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26:57–63Google Scholar
  7. Maier W, Philipp M (1986) Construct validity of the DSM-III and RDC classification of melancholia (endogeneous depression). J Psychiatr Res 20:289–299Google Scholar
  8. Philipp M, Delmo CD (1988) Outpatient-version of the Polydiagnostic Interview. Department of Psychiatry, University of MainzGoogle Scholar
  9. Philipp M, Frommberger U (1985) The Polydiagnostic Follow-Up Interview: a structured interview for conducting polydiagnostic orientated prospective follow-up studies. Department of Psychiatry, University of MainzGoogle Scholar
  10. Philipp M, Maier W (1985) Operational diagnosis of endogenous depression. I. Comparison with clinical diagnosis. Pharmacopsychiatry 18:114–115Google Scholar
  11. Philipp M, Maier W (1986) The Polydiagnostic Interview: a structured interview for polydiagnostic classification of psychiatric patients. Psychopathology 19:175–185Google Scholar
  12. Philipp M, Maier W (1987) Diagnosensysteme endogene Depressionen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Philipp M, Maier W, Benkert O (1985) Operational diagnosis of endogenous depression. II. Comparison of 8 different operational diagnoses. Psychopathology 18:218–225Google Scholar
  14. Spitzer R, Endicott J, Robins E (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35: 773–782Google Scholar
  15. World Health Organisation (1987) April 1987 draft of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research, chapt V: mental and behavioral disorders (F00-F99). WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. World Health Organisation (1989) April 1989 draft of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research, chapt V: mental and behavioral disorders (F00-F99). WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Philipp
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Maier
    • 1
  • Cynthia D. Delmo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MainzMainzFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations