The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers
- 70 Downloads
A study of 449 cases administered by four major providers of ADR services showed that mediation was capable of settling 78 percent of cases, regardless of whether the parties had been sent to mediation by a court or had selected the process voluntarily. Mediation also cost far less than arbitration, took less time, and was judged a more satisfactory process than arbitration.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brett, J. M. 1986. Commentary on procedural justice papers.Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 1, edited by R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Carver, T. and A. A. Vondra. 1994. Alternative dispute resolution: Why it doesn't work and why it does.Harvard Business Review (May–June): 120–130.Google Scholar
- McEwen, C. 1992. Note on mediation research. InDispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation and other processes, 2nd ed., edited by S. B. Goldberg, F. E. A. Sander, and N. H. Rogers. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
- Scott, S. 1995. Law firm practices in ADR: 1994 survey findings. New York: Center for Public Resources Institute for Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
- Scudder, E. 1995. Personal communication with Jeanne M. Brett.Google Scholar
- Thibaut, J. and L. Walker. 1975.Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar