Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 279–290 | Cite as

Differential susceptibility of two varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) to phosphorus-induced zinc deficiency

  • N. M. Safaya
  • Bharat Singh
Article

Summary

In a soil pot culture experiment conducted under greenhouse conditions, two varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) were found to be differentially susceptible to phosphorus-induced zinc deficiency. Although phosphate application, in the absence of applied zinc, caused growth disorder in both the varieties, the symptoms were more virulent, appeared early and were induced with both 25 and 75 ppm phosphorus in variety HFC-42-1, as against FOS-1, in which case zinc deficiency symptoms appeared under P75Zn0 treatment only. Contrary to the expectation the more susceptible variety was found to have higher zinc concentration in its shoots and thus the differential susceptibility of these varieties of cowpea could not be related to their zinc absorption characteristics. High phosphate application caused efflux of zinc during 16–32 day growth in both the varieties. However, higher sensitivity to phosphorus-induced zinc disorder in variety HFC-42-1, appeared to be due to nearly 2 times higher P concentration in this variety as against FOS-1. The results indicate that variety HFC-42-1 has a greater need for zinc because of its inherent capacity to accumulate more phosphorus. Dry matter yield and phosphorus and zinc content in the varieties were also differentially affected by the applications of both phosphate as well as zinc. re]19760504

Keywords

Zinc Zinc Absorption Zinc Deficiency Zinc Content Susceptible Variety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ambler, J. E. and Brown, J. C., Causes of differential susceptibility to zinc deficiency in two varieties of navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agron. J.61, 41–43 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boawn, L. C. and Brown, J. C., Further evidence for a P-Zn imbalance in plants. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.32, 94–97 (1968).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boawn, L. C. and Leggett, G. E., Phosphorus and zinc concentrations in Russett Burbank potato tissue in relation to development of zinc deficiency symptoms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.28, 229–232 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, J. C., Ambler, J. E., Chaney, R. L. and Foy, C. D., Differential responses of plant genotypes to micronutrients.In Micronutrients in Agriculture. Publ. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Inc. Madison, Wisc. U.S.A. 389–478 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edwards, J. H. and Kamprath, E. J., Zinc accumulation and growth of corn seedlings as affected by endosperm removal. Agron. J.67, 809–812 (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellis, B. G., Response and susceptibility.In Zinc deficiency — a symposium. Crops Soils18, 10–13 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gregory, F. G. and Crowther, F., A physiological study of varietal differences in plants. Part I. A study of the comparative yields of barley varieties with different manurings. Ann. Bot.42, 757–770 (1928).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, C. M. and Ulrich, A., Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. Bull. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. No.766 (1959).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Millikan, C. R., Plant varieties and species in relation to the occurrence of deficiencies and excesses of certain nutrient elements. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci.27, 220–233 (1961).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Millikan, C. R., Effects of different levels of zinc and phosphorus on the growth of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Aust. J. Agric. Res.14, 180–205 (1963).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olsen, S. R., Micronutrient interactions.In Micronutrients in Agriculture. Pub., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Inc. Madison Wisc. U.S.A. 243–264 (1972).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paulsen, G. M. and Rotimi, O. A., Phosphorus-zinc interaction in two soybean varieties differing in sensitivity to phosphorus nutrition. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.32, 73–76 (1968).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Safaya, N. M., Phosphorus-zinc interaction in relation to absorption rates of phosphorus, zinc, copper, manganese and iron in corn (Zea mays L.). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.40, 719–722 (1976).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Safaya, N. M., Shukla, U. C. and Khanna, S. S., Behaviour of zinc in soils and plants. Fert. News19, 21–27 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Safaya, N. M., Shukla, U. C. and Khanna, S. S., Nutritional physiology of zinc and symptoms of its deficiency in some field crops. Fert. News20, 31–35 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. M. Safaya
    • 1
  • Bharat Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Project ReclamationUniversity Station, University of North DakotaGrand Forks

Personalised recommendations