Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp 45–60 | Cite as

Risk-adjusted control charts for health care assessment

  • Farrokh Alemi
  • Walter Rom
  • Eric Eisenstein
Article

Abstract

The recent Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) requirement that hospital accreditation be based upon a Total Quality Management (TQM) approach has focused the attention of health care administrations on the use of techniques such as control charts. However, control charts are not typically adjusted for severity of illness. This adjustment is needed because, unlike industrial organizations, hospitals are not able to control all of their inputs and must accept variances in their patients. In this paper, we present a methodology for adjusting a health care organization's control charts to reflect their patient population's severity of illness during different time intervals. We then demonstrate that risk-adjusting expected patient outcomes can change our assessments of the relative quality of care offered by a health care organization in different time periods.

Keywords

Control chart quality of care risk adjustment severity of illness total quality management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alemi, F. and R. Hankin, Predicting in-hospital survival of myocardial infarction, Medical Care 28, 1990, 9.Google Scholar
  2. Backofen, J., A. Ashworth and S.D. Horn, The computerized severity of illness index: A new sophisticated tool to measure hospital quality of care, Health Care Forum 2, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Berwick, D.M., Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care, The New England Journal of Medicine 320, 1989, 1.Google Scholar
  4. Besterfield, D.H.,Quality Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Brewster, A.C., B.G. Karlin, L.A. Hyde, C.M. Jacobs, R.C. Bradbury and Y.M. Chae, A clinically based approach to classifying hospital patients at admission, Inquiry 12, 1985.Google Scholar
  6. Dubois, R.W., R.H. Brook and W.H. Rogers, Adjusted hospital death rates: A potential screen for quality of medical care, American Journal of Public Health 77, 1987, 9.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, J.R.,The Management and Control of Quality, West Publ., St. Paul, MN, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Fetter, R.B., D.A. Grand and D. Gamache,DRGs: Their Design and Development, Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Fisz M.,Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  10. Gonnella, J.S., M.C. Hornbrook and D.Z. Louis, Staging of disease: A case mix measurement, Journal of the American Medical Association 251, 1984.Google Scholar
  11. Gustafson, D.H., D.G. Fryback, J.H. Rose, V. Yick, C.T. Prokop and D.E. Detmer, A decision theoretic methodology for severity of illness development, Medical Decision Making 6, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. Hadorn, D.C., E.B. Keeler, W.H. Rogers and R.H. Brook, Assessing the performance of mortality prediction models, RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research, Santa Monica, CA, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. Hannan, E.L. and T.W. Hartman, A critique of the 1987 HCFA mortality study based on New York State data, Department of Health, Office of Health Systems Management, Albany, NY, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, D.C., Cost containment in medicine: Why cardiology, American Journal of Cardiology 56, 1985, 5.Google Scholar
  15. Horn, S.D., P.D. Sharkey, A.F. Chambers and R.A. Horn, Severity of illness within DRGs: Impact on prospective payment, American Journal of Public Health 75, 1985, 10.Google Scholar
  16. Horn, S.D., R.A. Horn, P.D. Sharkey and A.F. Chambers, Severity of illness within DRGs: Homogeneity study, Medical Care 24, 1986, 3.Google Scholar
  17. Knaus, W.A., E.A. Draper, D.P. Wagner and J.E. Zimmerman, APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system, Critical Care Medicine 13, 1985, 10.Google Scholar
  18. Laffel, F. and D. Blumenthal, The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations, Journal of the American Medical Association 262, 1989, 20.Google Scholar
  19. Pozen, M.W., R.B. D'Agostino, J.B. Mitchell, D.M. Rosenfeld, J.T. Guglielmino, M.L. Schwartz, N. Teebagy, J.M. Valentine and W.B. Hood, Jr., The usefulness of a predictive instrument to reduce inappropriate admission to coronary care unit, Annals of Internal Medicine 92, 1980, Pt 1.Google Scholar
  20. Ramsey, L.P. and R.S. Cantrell, Investigating cost variances using control charts, Healthcare Financial Management, 1985.Google Scholar
  21. Thomas, J.W. and D.R. Longo, Application of severity measurement systems for hospital quality management, Hospital and Health Services Administration 35, 1990, 2.Google Scholar
  22. Weinstein, M.C., P.G. Coxson, L.W. Williams, T.M. Pass, W.B. Stason and L. Goldman, Forecasting coronary heart disease incidence, mortality, and most: The coronary heart disease policy model, American Journal of Public Health 77, 1987, 11.Google Scholar
  23. Young, W.W., Measuring the cost of care using patient management categories: Final report of the Health Care Finance Administration, Baltimore, MD, Grant No. 18P97063/3, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farrokh Alemi
    • 1
  • Walter Rom
    • 2
  • Eric Eisenstein
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Care Administration ProgramCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Production and Operations Management DepartmentCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Outcomes Research and Assessment GroupDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations