Low-lying excited states of quantum antiferromagnets on a triangular lattice
- 50 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
We study low-lying states of theXY and Heisenberg antiferromagnets on a triangular lattice to clarify whether spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs atT=0 in the thermodynamic limit. Approximate forms of low-lying states are proposed, in which degrees of freedom of the sublattice magnetization and of the chirality are separated. These approximate states have a long-range order and twofold structures. It is shown that low-lying states can be accurately described with the present approximation. It has been argued that low-lying states play an important role in symmetry breaking. With the help of this approximation, we discuss the contribution of low-lying states to symmetry breaking of two types, namely creation of the spontaneous sublattice magnetization and the spontaneous chirality. Furthermore, to show evidence for the occurrence of symmetry breaking, we numerically study the low-lying states of finite systems of theXY and Heisenberg antiferromagnets. It is found that the necessary conditions for the symmetry breaking to occur are satisfied in these models.
Key Words
Quantum antiferromagnets Heisenberg model XY model triangular lattice low-lying states symmetry breakingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.P. W. Anderson,Mat. Res. Bull. 8:153 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.P. Fazekas and P. W. Anderson,Phil. Mag. 30:423 (1974).Google Scholar
- 3.V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 59:2095 (1987);Phys. Rev. B 39:11879 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.S. Miyashita,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53:44 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D. A. Huse and V. Elser,Phys. Rev. Lett. 60:2531 (1988).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.T. Oguchi, in Proceedings of International Meeting on Transition to New Type of Ordered Phase, Kyoto, 1982,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 52(Suppl.):183 (1983).Google Scholar
- 7.S. J. Miyake,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61:983 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.T. Momoi and M. Suzuki,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61:3732 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.P. W. Leung and K. J. Runge,Phys. Rev. B 47:5861 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. R. P. Singh and D. A. Huse,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68:1766 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.H. Nishimori and H. Nakanishi,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57:626 (1988);58:3433 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre,Phys. Rev. Lett. 69:2590 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.P. Horsch and W. von der Linden,Z. Phys. B 72:181 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.T. Koma and H. Tasaki, Symmetry breaking and finite size effects in quantum many-body systems, preprint.Google Scholar
- 15.S. Tang and J. E. Hirsch,Phys. Rev. B 39:4548 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.P. Azaria, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna,Phys. Rev. Lett. 70:2483 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.T. Koma and H. Tasaki,Phys. Rev. Lett. 70:93 (1992);Commun. Math. Phys. 158:191 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.S. Miyashita,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 87:112 (1986).Google Scholar
- 19.H. Nishimori and S. J. Miyake,Prog. Theory. Phys. 73:18 (1985).Google Scholar
- 20.Z. Weihong, J. Oittmaa, and C. J. Hamer,Phys. Rev. B 44:11869 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.D. D. Betts and S. Miyashita,Can. J. Phys. 68:1410 (1990).Google Scholar
- 22.P. Azaria, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68:1762 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson,Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics I, II (Springer, 1979).Google Scholar
- 24.D. A. Huse,Phys. Rev. B 37:2380 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.I. Affleck and E. H. Lieb,Lett. Math. Phys. 12:57 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.M. Suzuki and S. Miyashita,Can. J. Phys. 56:902 (1978).Google Scholar
- 27.E. H. Lieb and D. Mattis,J. Math. Phys. 3:749 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.S. Miyashita, inProceedings of the Workshop on Quantum Simulations of Condensed Matter Phenomena, J. D. Doll and J. E. Gubernatis, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), p. 228.Google Scholar