Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 77, Issue 5–6, pp 1007–1025 | Cite as

Brownian dynamics of polydisperse colloidal hard spheres: Equilibrium structures and random close packings

  • W. Schaertl
  • H. Sillescu
Articles
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Recently we presented a new technique for numerical simulations of colloidal hard-sphere systems and showed its high efficiency. Here, we extend our calculations to the treatment of both 2- and 3-dimensional monodisperse and 3-dimensional polydisperse systems (with sampled finite Gaussian size distribution of particle radii), focusing on equilibrium pair distribution functions and structure factors as well as volume fractions of random close packing (RCP). The latter were determined using in principle the same technique as Woodcock or Stillinger had used. Results for the monodisperse 3-dimensional system show very good agreement compared to both pair distribution and structure factor predicted by the Percus-Yevick approximation for the fluid state (volume fractions up to 0.50). We were not able to find crystalline 3d systems at volume fractions 0.50–0.58 as shown by former simulations of Reeet al. or experiments of Pusey and van Megen, due to the fact that we used random start configurations and no constraints of particle positions as in the cell model of Hoover and Ree, and effects of the overall entropy of the system, responsible for the melting and freezing phase transitions, are neglected in our calculations. Nevertheless, we obtained reasonable results concerning concentration-dependent long-time selfdiffusion coefficients (as shown before) and equilibrium structure of samples in the fluid state, and the determination of the volume fraction of random close packing (RCP, glassy state). As expected, polydispersity increases the respective volume fraction of RCP due to the decrease in free volume by the fraction of the smaller spheres which fill gaps between the larger particles.

Key Words

Brownian dynamics simulations colloidal hard spheres polydispersity random close packing 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. M. Kops-Werkhoven and H. M. Fijnaut,J. Chem. Phys. 77:2242 (1982).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. van Veluven, H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, C. G. de Kruif, and A. Vrij,J. Chem. Phys. 89:2810 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. van Megen and S. M. Underwood,J. Chem. Phys. 91:552 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Degorgio, R. Piazza, M. Corti, and J. Stavans,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87: 431 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Bartsch, M. Antonietti, W. Schupp, and H. Sillescu,J. Chem. Phys. 97:3950 (1992).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. A. Murray and D. H. van Winkle,Phys. Rev. Lett. 58:1200 (1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Schaertl, Ph.D. thesis, Mainz University (1992).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kasper, Diploma thesis, Mainz University (1993).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Schaertl and H. Sillescu,J. Colloid Interface Sci. 155:313 (1993).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Kose, M. Ozaki, K. Takano, Y. Kobayashi, and S. Hachisu,J. Colloid Interface Sci. 44:330 (1973).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Williams and R. S. Crandall,Phys. Lett. A 48:225 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Yoshida, K. Ito, and N. Ise,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:592 (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Stoelken, Ph.D. thesis, Mainz University, in preparation.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. B. Sirota, H. D. Ou-Yang, S. U. Sinka, P. M. Chaikin, J. D. Axe and Y. Fujii,Phys. Rev. Lett. 62:1524 (1989).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. B. Bradford and J. W. Vanderhoff,J. Appl. Phys. 26:864 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. W. Vanderhoff,Prepr. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Org. Coat. Plast. 24:223 (1964).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Antonietti, W. Bremser, D. Müschenborn, Ch. Rosenauer, B. Schupp, and M. Schmidt,Macromolecules 24:6636 (1991).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. Frenz, Ph.D. thesis, Mainz University, in preparation.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Binder,Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Springer, 1986).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Gould and J. Tobochnik,An Introduction to Computer Simulation Methods, Parts 1 and 2 (Addison-Wesley, 1988).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright,J. Chem. Phys. 31:459 (1960).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. Verlet,Phys. Rev. 159:98 (1967).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. L. Ermak,J. Chem. Phys. 62:4189/4197 (1975).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. L. Ermak and J. A. McCammon,J. Chem. Phys. 69:1352 (1978).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. O. Robbins, K. Kremer, and G. S. Grest,J. Chem. Phys. 88:3286 (1988).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Pistoor and K. Kremer,Prog. Colloid Polymer Sci. 81:184 (1990).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Löwen and G. Szamel, to be published (1993); H. Löwen, private communication.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Klein, W. Hess, and G. Nägele,Physics of Complex and Supramolecular Fluids (Wiley, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    I. Snook and W. van Megen,J. Colloid Inteface Sci. 100:194 (1984).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    B. Cichocki and K. Hinsen,Physica A. 166:473 (1990).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Cichocki and K. Hinsen,Physica A. 187:133 (1992).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    W. Schaert and H. Sillescu,J. Stat. Phys. 74:687 (1994).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Medina-Noyola,Phys. Rev. Lett. 60:2705 (1988).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. Möller, Ph.D. thesis, Mainz University, in preparation.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. K. Percus and G. L. Yevick,Phys. Rev. 110:1 (1958).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    E. Thiele,J. Chem. Phys. 39:474 (1963).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. S. Wertheim,Phys Lett. 10:E501 (1963).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    G. Throop and R. J. Bearman,J. Chem. Phys. 42:2408 (1965).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    W. R. Smith and D. Henderson,Mol. Phys. 19:411 (1970).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    D. Henderson and E. W. Grundke,J. Chem. Phys. 63:601 (1975).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    W. G. Hoover and F. H. Ree,J. Chem. Phys. 49:3609 (1968).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    P. N. Pusey and W. van Megen,Nature 320:340 (1986).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    L. V. Woodcock,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday II 72:1667 (1976).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    L. V. Woodcock,Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 37:274 (1981).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    B. D. Lubachevsky, F. H. Stillinger, and E. N. Pinson,J. Stat. Phys. 64:501 (1991).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    P. N. Pusey, InLight Scattering in Liquids and Macromolecular Solutions (Plenum Press, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    W. K. Pratt,Digital Image Processing (Wiley, 1978).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R. W. Ramirez,The FFT (Tektronix, New Jersey, 1985).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    P. van Beurten and A. Vrij,J. Chem. Phys. 74:2744 (1981).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    J. L. Lebowitz,Phys. Rev. 133:A895 (1964).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. Vrij,J. Chem. Phys. 69:1742 (1978).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    C. G. de Kruif, W. J. Briels, R. P. May, and A. Vrij,Langmuir 4:668 (1988).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J. L. Barrat and J. P. Hansen,J. Phys. (Paris)47:1547 (1986).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    P. N. Pusey,J. Phys. (Paris)48:709 (1987).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    W. Schaertl and H. Sillescu, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Schaertl
    • 1
  • H. Sillescu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Physikalische ChemieJohannes Gutenberg-Universität MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations