Biogeochemistry

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 401–418 | Cite as

Fluxes of nitrous oxide from boreal peatlands as affected by peatland type, water table level and nitrification capacity

  • Kristiina Regina
  • Hannu Nykänen
  • Jouko Silvola
  • Pertti J. Martikainen
Article

Abstract

Peat soils with high nitrogen content are potential sources of nitrous oxide (N2O). Fluxes of nitrous oxide were measuredin situ on nine virgin and ten drained peatlands of different hydrology and nutrient status. Numbers of nitrifying bacteria were estimated in different layers of the peat profiles with a most-probable-number technique. Nitrification potentials were determined in soil slurries of pH 4 and 6 from the profiles of six peat soils. Many virgin peatlands showed low N2O uptake. Lowering of the water table generally increased the average fluxes of N2O from the soils, although more in minerotrophic (nutrient rich) than in ombrotrophic (nutrient poor) sites. Ammonium oxidizing bacteria were found on only two sites but nitrite oxidizers were detected in almost all peat profiles. More nitrite oxidizers were found in drained than in virgin peat profiles. Nitrification was enhanced after lowering of the water table in minerotrophic peat but not in ombrotrophic peat. The N2O fluxes correlated positively with the numbers of nitrite oxidizers, nitrification potential, N, P and Ca content and pH of the soil and negatively with the level of water table (expressed as negative values) and K content of the soil.

Key words

nitrifiers nitrification potential nitrous oxide peatland water table 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarnio T & Martikainen PJ (1995) Mineralization of C and N and nitrification in scots pine forest soil treated with nitrogen fertilizers containing different proportions of urea and its slow-releasing derivative, ureaformaldehyde. Plant and Soil 27: 1325–1331Google Scholar
  2. Alexander M & Clark FE (1965) Nitrifying bacteria. In: Black CA et al. (Eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen SE (1974) Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Belser LW (1977) Nitrate reduction to nitrite, a possible source of nitrite for growth of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 34: 403–410Google Scholar
  5. Bender M & Conrad R (1994) Microbial oxidation of methane, ammonium and carbon monoxide, and turnover of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide in soils. Biogeochem. 27: 97–112Google Scholar
  6. Bijay-Singh , Ryden JC & Whitehead DC (1988) Some relationships between denitrification potential and fractions of organic carbon in air-dried and field-moist soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20: 737–741Google Scholar
  7. Bock E, Wilderer PA & Freitag A (1988) Growth ofNitrobacter in the absence of dissolved oxygen. Wat. Res. 22: 245–250Google Scholar
  8. Cicerone RJ (1987) Changes in stratospheric ozone. Science 237: 35–42Google Scholar
  9. Crill PM, Martikainen PJ, Nykänen H. & Silvola J. (1994) Temperature and N fertilization effects on methane oxidation in a drained peatland soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26: 1331–1339Google Scholar
  10. Davidson EA, Swank WT & Perry TO (1986) Distinquishing between nitrification and denitrification as sources of gaseous nitrogen production in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52: 1280–1286Google Scholar
  11. Davidson EA (1993) Soil water content and the ratio of nitrous oxide to nitric oxide emitted from soil. In: Oremland RS (Ed) Biogeochemistry of Global Change, Radiatively Active Trace Gases (pp 369–384). Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. De Boer W Klein Gunnewiek PJA, Troelstra SR & Laanbroek HJ (1989) Two types of chemolithotrophic nitrification in acid heathland humus. Plant and soil 119: 229–235Google Scholar
  13. De Boer W Klein Gunnewiek PJA, Veenhuis M, Bock E & Laanbroek HJ (1991) Nitrification at low pH by aggregated chemolithotrophic bacteria. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 57: 3600–3604Google Scholar
  14. De Boer W, Tietema A, Klein Gunnewiek PJA & Laanbroek HJ (1992) The chemolithotrophic ammonium-oxidizing community in a nitrogen saturated acid forest soil in relation to pH-dependent nitrifying activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24: 229–234Google Scholar
  15. De Boer W, Klein Gunnewiek PA & Laanbroek HJ (1995) Ammonium oxidation at low pH by a chemolithotrophic bacterium belonging to the genusNitrosospira. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27: 127–132Google Scholar
  16. DeLaune RD, Patrick WH, Lindau CW and Smith CJ (1990) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from Gulf Coast wetlands. In: Bouwman AF (Ed) Soils and the Greenhouse Effect (pp497–502). John Wiley & Sons Ltd., EnglandGoogle Scholar
  17. Drury CF, McKenney DJ & Findlay WI (1991) Relationships between denitrification, microbial biomass and indigenous soil properties. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23: 751–755Google Scholar
  18. Focht DD & Verstraete W (1977) Biochemical ecology of nitrification and denitrification. In: Alexander M (Ed) Advances in Microbial Ecology, Vol 1 (pp 135–214). Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman C, Lock MA & Reynolds B (1993) Fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O from a Welsh peatland following simulation of water table draw-down: Potential feedback to climatic change. Biogeochem. 19: 51–60Google Scholar
  20. Freitag A, Rudert M & Bock E (1987) Growth ofNitrobacter by dissimilatoric nitrate reduction. FEMS Microbiol. Letters 48: 105–109Google Scholar
  21. Goodroad LL & Keeney DR (1984) Nitrous oxide emission from forest, marsh and prairie ecosystems. J. Environ. Qual. 13: 448–452Google Scholar
  22. Goreau TJ, Kaplan WA, Wofsy SC, McElroy MB, Valois FW & Watson SW (1980) Production of NO2 and N2O by nitrifying bacteria at reduced concentrations of oxygen. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 40: 526–532Google Scholar
  23. Hankinson TR & Schmidt EL (1984) Examination of acid forest soil for ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing autotrophic bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 30: 1125–1132Google Scholar
  24. Hankinson TR & Schmidt EL (1988) An acidophilic and a neutrophilicNitrobacter strain isolated from the numerically predominant nitrite-oxidizing population of an acid forest soil. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 54: 1536–1540Google Scholar
  25. Hynes RK & Knowles R (1982) Effect of acetylene on autotrophic and heterotrophic nitrification. Can. J. Microbiol. 28: 334–340Google Scholar
  26. Ivarson KC (1977) Changes in decomposition rate, microbial population and carbohydrate content of an acid peat bog after liming and reclamation. Can. J. Soil Sci. 57: 129–137Google Scholar
  27. Kaunisto S & Paavilainen E (1988) Nutrient stores in old drainage areas and growth of stands. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 145: 1–39Google Scholar
  28. Laanbroek HJ & Schotman JMT (1991) Effect of nitrite concentration and pH on most probable number enumerations of non-growingNitrobacter spp. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 85: 269–278Google Scholar
  29. Li C, Frolking SE, Harrish RC & Terry RE (1994) Modeling nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture: a Florida case study. Chemosphere 28: 1410–1415Google Scholar
  30. L»ng K, Lehtonen M & Martikainen PJ (1994) Nitrification potentials at different pH values in peat samples from various layers of a drained mire. Geomicrobiol. J. 11: 141–147Google Scholar
  31. Manabe S & Wetherald RT (1986) Reduction in summer soil wetness induced by an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 232: 626–628Google Scholar
  32. Martikainen PJ (1985) Numbers of nitrifiers and nitrification in fertilized forest soil. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 17: 245–248Google Scholar
  33. Martikainen PJ & De Boer W (1993) Nitrous oxide production and nitrification in acidic soil from a Dutch coniferous forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25: 343–347Google Scholar
  34. Martikainen PJ, Lehtonen M, L»ng K, De Boer W & Ferm A (1993a) Nitrification and nitrous oxide production potentials in aerobic soil samples from the soil profile of a Finnish coniferous site receiving high ammonium deposition. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 13: 113–122Google Scholar
  35. Martikainen PJ & Nurmiaho-Lassila E-L (1985)Nitrosospira, an important ammonium-oxidizing bacterium in fertilized coniferous soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 31: 190–197Google Scholar
  36. Martikainen PJ, Nykänen H, Crill P & Silvola J (1993b) Effect of a lowered water table on nitrous oxide fluxes from northern peatlands, Nature 366: 51–53Google Scholar
  37. Martin NJ & Holding AJ (1978) Nutrient availability and other factors limiting microbial activity in the blanket peat. In: Heal OW & Perkins DF (Eds) Production Ecology of British Moors and Montane Grasslands (pp 113–135). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitchell JFB (1989) The "greenhouse" effect and climate change. Rev. Geophys. 27: 115–139Google Scholar
  39. Müller MM, Sundman V & Skujins J (1980) Denitrification in low pH spodosols and peats determined with the acetylene inhibition method. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40: 235–239Google Scholar
  40. Neill C (1995) Seasonal flooding, nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen utilization in a prairie marsh. Biogeochem. 30: 171–189Google Scholar
  41. Nykänen H, Alm J, L»ng K, Silvola J & Martikainen PJ (1995a) Emissions of CH4, N2O and C02 from a virgin fen and a fen drained for grassland in Finland. Journal of Biogeography 22: 351–357Google Scholar
  42. Nykänen H, Silvola J, Alm J & Martikainen PJ (1995b) Fluxes of greenhouse gases CH4, CO2 and N2O from some peat harvesting areas. In: Estonian Ministry of Environment, Environment Information Centre (Ed) Peat Industry and Environment, proceedings, Pärnu, Estonia, Sep 12–15, 1995 (pp 41–43). Tallinna Raamatutrükikoda, EstoniaGoogle Scholar
  43. Parkin T (1987) Soil microsites as a source of denitrification variability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1194–1199Google Scholar
  44. Rangeley A and Knowles R (1988) Nitrogen transformations in a Scottish peat soil under laboratory conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20: 385–391Google Scholar
  45. Rosswall T & Granhall U (1980) Nitrogen cycling in a subarctic ombrotrophic mire. Ecol.Bull 30: 209–234Google Scholar
  46. Rowe R, Todd R & Waide J (1977) Microtechnique for most-probable- number analysis. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 33: 675–680Google Scholar
  47. Ruuhijärvi R (1983) The Finnish mire types and their distribution. In: Gore AJP, (Ed) Ecosystems of the World. 4B. Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor (pp 47–67). Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  48. Schiller CL & Hastie DR (1994) The exchange of nitrous oxide within the Hudson Bay lowland. J. Geophys. Res. 99: 1573–1588Google Scholar
  49. Verhoeven JTA (1986) Nutrient dynamics in minerotrophic peat mires. Aquatic Botany 25 117–137Google Scholar
  50. Weier KL, Doran JW, Power JF & Walters DT (1993) Denitrification and the dinitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon, and nitrate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57: 66–72Google Scholar
  51. Woldendorp JW & Laanbroek HJ (1989) Activity of nitrifiers in relation to nitrogen nutrition of plants in natural ecosystems. Plant and Soil 115: 217–228Google Scholar
  52. Zimenko TG & Misnik AG (1970) Effect of ground-water level on ammonification and nitrification in peat bog soils. Mikrobiologija 39: 440–449Google Scholar
  53. Yoshinari T (1985) Nitrite and nitrous oxide production byMethylosinus trichosporium. Can. J. Microbiol. 31: 139–144Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristiina Regina
    • 1
  • Hannu Nykänen
    • 1
  • Jouko Silvola
    • 2
  • Pertti J. Martikainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Environmental MicrobiologyNational Public Health InstituteKuopioFinland
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of JoensuuJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations