Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 71, Issue 1–3, pp 433–443 | Cite as

The structure and function of mycelial systems of ectomycorrhizal roots with special reference to their role in forming inter-plant connections and providing pathways for assimilate and water transport

  • C. Brownlee
  • J. A. Duddridge
  • A. Malibari
  • D. J. Read
Article

Summary

In the past function of mycorrhizas has been examined at the level either of the isolated individual root or of the individual entire plant. It is shown here that ectomycorrhizal mycelial strands can extend from plant to plant, thus initiating infection in seedlings, and that the resulting fungal interconnections provide functional pathways for the transfer of labelled assimilate between individuals. Mycelial strands also provide a pathway for the transport of physiologically significant quantities of water. Strand functions are examined in relation to structure, and their role as morphological and physiological extensions of the root system is emphasized. The significance of the experimental observations is discussed in relation to nutrient cycling processes in natural ecosystems.

Key words

Assimilate transfer Ectomycorrhiza Mycelial strands Pine Pinus sylvestris Suillus bovinus Vessel hyphae Water transport 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chiariello N, Hickman J C and Moony H A 1982 Endomycorrhizal role for interspecific transfer of phosphorus in a community of annual plants. Science 217, 941–943.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duddridge J, Malibari A and Read D J 1980 Structure and function of mycelial rhizomorphs with special reference to their role in water transport. Nature London 287, 834–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falck R 1912 Die Merulius-Fäule des Bauholzes. Hausschwammforschungen 6, 1–405.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harley J L 1975 Problems of Mycotrophy.In Endomycorrhizas. Eds. F E Sanders, B Mosse and P Tinker. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kramer P J and Bullock H C 1966 Seasonal variations in the proportions of suberized and unsuberized roots of trees in relation to the absorption of water. Am. J. Bot. 53, 200–204.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mosse, B 1975 Specificity in VA mycorrhizas.In Endomycorrhizas. Eds. F E Sanders, B Mosse and P Tinker Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newman E I 1969 Resistance to water flow in soil and plant. I Soil resistance in relation to amounts of root: theoretical estimates. J. Appl. Ecol. 6, 1–12.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pearson V and Read D J 1973 The biology of mycorrhiza in the Ericaceae. I. The isolation of the endophyte and synthesis of mycorrhizas in aseptic cultures. New Phytol. 72, 371–379.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reid C P P and Woods F W 1969 Translocation of C14-labelled compounds in mycorrhizal and its implications in interplant nutrient cycling. Ecology 50, 179–187.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sands R, Fiscus E L and Reid C P P 1982 Hydraulic properties of pine and bean roots with varying degrees of suberization, vascular differentiation, and mycorrhizal infection. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. (In press).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trappe J 1962 Fungus associates of ectotrophic mycorrhizas. Bot. Rev. 28, 538.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whittingham J and Read D J 1982 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation systems. III. Nutrient transfer between plants with mycorrhizal interconnections. New Phytol. 90, 277–284.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Brownlee
    • 1
  • J. A. Duddridge
    • 1
  • A. Malibari
    • 1
  • D. J. Read
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations