Plant and Soil

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 237–243 | Cite as

Salt tolerance of rice cultivars

  • N. K. Fageria


The dry matter production and the concentration of nutrients in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars from soil adjusted to different levels of salinity were evaluated under a greenhouse conditions. Soil salinity levels were produced by applying 0.34 mol l−1 solution of NaCl which resulted in the following levels, control (0.29), 5, 10 and 15 dS m−1 conductivity of saturation extract. The effect of salinity on dry matter production varied from cultivar to cultivar.

The concentrations of P and K in the tops of rice cultivars decreased with increasing soil salinity. But the concentrations of Na, Zn, Cu and Mn increased.

Significant varietal differences were found in relation to salinity tolerance. Based on dry matter yield reduction, rice cultivars were classified as tolerant, moderately tolerant, moderately susceptible or susceptible.

Key words

Dry matter production Electrical conductivity Nutrient concentration Oryza sativaSalinity threshhold Screening of rice cultivars 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Akbar M and Yabuno T 1974 Breeding for saline-resistant varieties of rice. II. Comparative performance of some rice varieties to salinity during early developmental stages. Japan J. Breed. 24, 176–181.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akbar M and Yabuno T 1975 Breeding for saline-resistant varieties of rice. III. Response of F1 hybrids to salinity in reciprocal crosses between Jhona 349 and Mangholia. Japan J. Breed. 24, 215–220.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akbar M and Yabuno T 1977 Breeding for saline-resistant varieties of rice. IV. Inheritance of delayed-type panicle sterility induced by salinity. Japan J. Breed. 27, 237–240.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akbar M, Yabuno T and Nakao S 1972 Breeding for saline-resistant varieties of rice. I. Variability for salt tolerance among some rice varieties. Japan J. Breed. 22, 277–284.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allison L E 1964 Salinity in relation to irrigation. Advnc. Agron. 16, 139–178.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bange G G J 1959 Interactions in the potassium and sodium absorption by intact maize seedlings. Plant and Soil. 11, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernstein L, François L E and Clark R A 1974 Interactive effects of salinity and fertility on yields of grains and vegetables. Agron. J. 66, 412–421.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fageria N K, Barbosa Filho M P and Gheyi H R 1981 Avaliação de cultivares de arroz para tolerância a salindiade. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., Brasília, 16, 677–681.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gauch H G and Eaton F M 1942 Effect of saline substrate on hourly levels of carbohydrates and inorganic constituents of barley plants. Plant Physiol. 17, 347–365.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hassan N A K, Drew J V, Knudsen D and Olson R A 1970 Influence of soil salinity on production of dry matter and uptake and distribution of nutrients in barley and corn. I. Barley. (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agron. J. 62, 43–45.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hayward H E and Long E M 1941 Anatomical and physiological responses of the tomato to varying concentrations of sodium chloride, sodium sulphate and nutrient solutions. Bot. Gaz. 120, 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ikehashi H and Ponnamperuma F N 1978 Varietal tolerance of rice for adverse soils. pp 801–823.In Soils and Rice. Int. Rice Res. Inst. Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khalil M A, Amer F and Elgabaly M M 1967 A salinity-fertility interaction study on corn and cotton. Soil Sci. Soc.. Am. Proc. 31, 683–686.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lunin J and Gallatin M H 1965 Salinity-fertility interactions in relation to the growth and composition of beams. I. Effect of N, P and K. Agron. J. 57, 339–342.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magistad O C, Ayers A D, Wadleigh C H and Gauch H G 1943 Effect of salt concentration, kind of salt, and climate on plant growth in sand cultures. Plant Physiol. 18, 151–166.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maas E V and Hoffman G J 1977 Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. J. Irrig. Drainage Div. Asce 103, 115–134.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maas E V and Nieman R H 1978 Physiology of plant tolerance to salinity.In Crop Tolerance to Suboptimal Land Conditions. Asa Special Publication No. 32, p. 277–299.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pearson G A 1959 Factors influencing salinity of submerged soil and growth of caloro rice. Soil Sci. 87, 198–206.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pearson G A and Bernstein L 1959 Salinity effects at several growth stages of rice. Agron. J. 51, 654–657.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ponnamperuma F N 1977 Screening rice for tolerance to mineral stress. S. I. IRRI, Research paper series 6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Strogonov B P 1962 Physiological basis of salt tolerance of plants. Israel Program Sci. Transl., Jerusalem 279 p.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    United States Salinity Laboratory Staff 1954 Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soil. USDA Handbook 60.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cock J H and Gomes K A 1976 Laboratory manual for physiological studies for rice. Los Baños, Philippines. The International Rice Research Institute. 62 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. K. Fageria
    • 1
  1. 1.National Rice and Bean Research Center of EMBRAPAGoiânia GoiásBrazil

Personalised recommendations