Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 241–248 | Cite as

Solubility relationships of arsenic in calcareous soils and its uptake by corn

  • Muhammad Sadiq
Article

Summary

The concentrations of total, water-extractable and DTPA extractable As were determined in 19 calcareous soils. The activity of HAsO 4 2− was calculated in the experimental soils and superimposed on the thermodynamic solubility isotherms of As minerals. It was observed that all the soils were undersaturated with respect to Ca3(AsO4)2 and Mn3(AsO4)2 (the most insoluble As minerals in the calcareous soils). The activity of Ca2+ in these soils was found to be in equilibrium with CaCO3.

Corn was grown in the experimental soils for 25 days. The corn plants were harvested, dried at 60°C, ground and analyzed for the concentrations of As. The concentrations of As in the plants were significantly correlated (P<0.05) to the water extractable As but not to the total and DTPA extractable concentrations of As in the soils. Sodium bicarbonate extractable P was significantly correlated (P<0.05) to both As in the corn and the water soluble As in the soils.

Key words

Arsenic As minerals in soils Calcium solubility Plant uptake Water extractable 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fleisher M 1973 Cycling and control of metals. Proc. Environ. Resources Conf. National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, USA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferguson J F and Gavis J 1972 A review of arsenic cycle in natural waters. Water Res. 6, 1259–1274.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffin R A and Jurinak J J 1973 Estimation of activity coefficients from the electrical conductivity of natural aquatic systems and soil extracts. Soil Sci. 116, 26–30.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnston S E and Barnard W M 1979 Comparative effectiveness of fourteen solutions for extracting arsenic from Western New York soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 43, 304–308.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liebig G F 1966 Arsenic.In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils. Ed. H D Chapman. University of California, Riverside, USA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindsay W L 1979 Chemical Equilibria in Soils. Wiley Interscience, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    NRC 1977 Committee of Medical and Biological effects of Environmental Pollutants: National Research Council, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Page A L, Miller R H and Keeney D R 1982 Methods of Soil Analysis, Part two, American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadiq M and Lindsay W L 1981 Selection of Standard Free Energies for use in Soil Chemistry, Arsenic Supplement to Tech. Bull. 134, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadiq M, Zaidi T H and Mian A A 1983 Environmental behaviour of arsenic in calcareous soils: Theoretical. Water Air and Soil Pollut. 20, 369–377.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walsh L M and Keeney D R 1975 Behaviour and phytotoxicity of inorganic arsenicals in soils. pp 35–52.In Arsenical Pesticides. Ed. A E Woolson. ACS Symposium Ser. 7, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woolson E A 1973 Arsenic phytotoxicity and uptake in six vegetable crops. Weed Sci. 21, 524–527.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Woolson A E, Axley J J and Kearney P C 1971 Correlation between available soil arsenic estimated by six methods and response to corn (Zea mays. L.). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35, 101–105.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Sadiq
    • 1
  1. 1.Water Resources and Environment Division, Research InstituteUniversity of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations