Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 231–239 | Cite as

Barley straw as an inhibitor of algal growth I: studies in the Chesterfield Canal

  • I. M. Welch
  • P. R. F. Barrett
  • M. T. Gibson
  • I. Ridge
Article

Abstract

The presence of rotting barley straw in a dis used canal reduced the amount of filamentous algae. No effect on algae was observed during the first season after the introduction of straw but algae were decreased in three subsequent years. Algal growth on microscope slides suspended in the water downstream of the straw was reduced by 90%, compared with slides upstream of the straw. A similar result was obtained forCladophora glomerata grown in chambers in the canal.

Phosphate, nitrate and ammonium concentrations were not altered significantly by the presence of straw, but nitrite concentrations were increased during summer months. Neither the nitrite increase, nor the possibility of pesticides being washed off the straw were considered likely causes of algal growth inhibition. Growth ofC. glomerata was inhibited in cages from which macro-invertebrate grazers were excluded. No obvious deleterious environmental effects were noted and the technique shows promise as a long-term method of controlling algae.

Key words

straw algal inhibition Cladophora glomerata 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. EIFAC Working Party on Water Quality Criteria for European Freshwater Fish (1984) Report on nitrite and freshwater fish. European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (EIFAC) Technical Paper 46, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome.Google Scholar
  2. Eisenreich S, Bannerman RT, Armstrong DE (1975) A simplified phosphorus analysis technique. Environ. Lett. 9: 43–53.Google Scholar
  3. Gibson MT, Welch IM, Barrett PRF, Ridge I (1990) Barley straw as an inhibitor of algal growth II: laboratory studies. J. applied Phycol. 2: 241–248.Google Scholar
  4. Harper SHT, Lynch JM (1985) Colonisation and decomposition of straw by fungi. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 85: 655–661.Google Scholar
  5. Jones JG (1979) A Guide to Methods for Estimating Microbial Numbers and Biomass in Fresh Water. Sci. Publs Freshwat. Biol. Ass. U.K. 39, 112 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Mackereth FJH, Heron J, Talling JF (1978) Water Analysis: Some Revised Methods for Limnologists. Sci. Publs Freshwat. Biol. As. U.K. 16, 120 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Mason CE (1981) Biology of Freshwater Pollution. Longman, London, 250 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Moss B (1987) The art of lake restoration. New Scientist, No. 1550, 41–43.Google Scholar
  9. Reed RH (1987) A rapid procedure for the determination of chlorophyll in marine macroalgae. Br. phycol. J. 22: 310.Google Scholar
  10. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Statistics Department, Genstat 5 Committee (1987) Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 749 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Street M (1978) Research on the improvement of gravel pits for waterfowl by adding straw. Game Conservancy Ann. Rev. 10: 56–61.Google Scholar
  12. Street M (1979) The importance of invertebrates and straw. Game Conservancy Ann. Rev. 11: 34–38.Google Scholar
  13. Wingfield GI, Greaves MP, Bebb JM, Seager M (1985) Microbial immobilisation of phosphorus as a potential means of reducing phosphorus pollution of water. Bull. environ. Contain. Toxicol. 34: 587–596.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. M. Welch
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. R. F. Barrett
    • 1
  • M. T. Gibson
    • 1
  • I. Ridge
    • 2
  1. 1.Aquatic Weeds Research Unit, (University of Bristol, Department of Agricultural SciencesAFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Long Ashton Research Station), Sonning Aquatic Research CentreReadingU.K.
  2. 2.Open University, Department of Biological Sciences, Walton HallMilton KeynesU.K.

Personalised recommendations