Quantitative assessment of the major limitations on productivity ofSpirulina platensis in open raceways
This work represents an attempt to assess the relative contribution of the factors limiting productivity ofSpirulina platensis in open raceways throughout the year. Temperature of the culture during daylight exerted the predominant effect on productivity and elevating the temperature resulted in a significant rise in productivity even in summer. Photoinhibition had a decisive role in summer in determining productivity ofSpirulina in open raceways in that growth almost ceased after mid-day. Contamination by other microorganisms, particularlyS. minor andChlorella sp. was estimated to reduce the net biomass yield by at least 15 to 20%, but measures to curtail the establishment of these species in the raceway have been devised. The effect of harvest time during the day on the yield of dry mass was examined: no conclusion could be drawn except in mid-summer, when evening harvesting resulted in a significant increase in the output rate of dry weight over morning harvesting.
It was estimated that in a subtropical climate with little cloudiness, it should be readily possible to obtain an annual output rate of dry mass of ca. 60 to 70 t ha−1. Such output, however, which would reduce very substantially the cost of production to-date, is possible only if the optimal temperature forSpirulina can be maintained throughout daylight, photoinhibition essentially controlled, harvesting in summer performed in the evening, and night-loss of dry mass as well as the extent of contamination by other cyanobacteria or microalgae can be kept low. The pronounced daily fluctuations in the output rate at peak productivity in summer suggest that when environmental limitations of growth are minimal, other limitations become dominant. These should be identified to facilitate an even greater increase in the productivity ofSpirulina in outdoor cultures.
Key wordsgrowth limitations Spirulina platensis open raceways productivity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bocci F, Torzillo G, Vincenzini M, Materassi R (1987) Growth physiology ofSpirulina platensis in tubular photobioreactor under natural light. In: Stadler T, Mollion J, Verdus M-C, Karamanos Y, Morvan H, Christian D (eds), Algal Biotechnology, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 219–228.Google Scholar
- Boussiba S, Sandbank E, Shelef G, Cohen Z, Vonshak A, Ben-Amotz A, Arad S, Richmond A (1988) Outdoor cultivation of the marine microalgaIsochrysis galbana in open raceways. Aquaculture 72: 247–253.Google Scholar
- Guterman H, Vonshak A, Ben-Yaakov S (1989) Automatic on-line growth estimation method for outdoor algal biomass production. Biotechnol. Bioengng. 132: 143–152.Google Scholar
- Linclon EP, Hall TW, Koopman B (1983) Zooplankton control in mass algal cultures. Aquaculture 32: 331.Google Scholar
- Richmond R (1986) Microalgal culture. CRC Critical Review in Biotechnology, 4 (4): 369–438.Google Scholar
- Richmond A, Karg S, Boussiba S (1982) The effect of the bicarbonate system on the competition betweenSpirulina platensis andChlorella sp. Plant Cell Physiol. 23 (8): 1411–1417.Google Scholar
- Richmond A, Grobbelaar JU (1986) Factors affecting the output rate ofSpirulina platensis with reference to mass cultivation. Biomass 10: 253–264.Google Scholar
- Richmond A (1986) Outdoor Mass Cultures of Microalgae. In: Richmond A (ed.), Handbook of Microalgal Mass Culture. CRC Press, Boca-Raton, Fl, 285–330.Google Scholar
- Richmond A (1987)Spirulina. In: Borowitzka MA, Borowitzka LJ (eds), Microalgal Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, 85–121.Google Scholar
- Torzillo G, Pushparaj B, Bocci F, Balloni F, Materassi W, Florenzano G (1986) Production ofSpirulina biomass in closed photobioreactors. Biomass 11: 61–64.Google Scholar
- Torzillo G, Materassi R (1990) Effect of temperature on the yield and night biomass losses inSpirulina platensis grown in photobioreactors. In: Abstracts of the 5th International Conference of the Society of Applied Algology on Recent Advances in Algal Biotechnology. Tiberias, Israel.Google Scholar
- Vonshak A (1986) Laboratory Techniques for the Culturing of Microalgae. In: Richmond A (ed.), Handbook for Microalgal Mass Culture. CRC Press. Boca Raton Fl, 117–146.Google Scholar
- Vonshak A, Abeliovich A, Boussiba S, Arad S, Richmond A (1982) On the production ofSpirulina biomass: effects of environmental factors and of the population density. Biomass 2: 175–185.Google Scholar
- Vonshak A, Boussiba S, Abeliovich A, Richmond A (1983) On the production ofSpirulina biomass: The maintenance of pure culture under outdoor conditions Biotech. Bioengng. 25 (2): 341–351.Google Scholar
- Vonshak A, Guy R (1988a) Photoinhibition in outdoor cultures of the cyanobacteriumSpirulina platensis In: Barber J, Malkin R (eds), Techniques and New Developments in Photosynthesis Research Plenum Press N.Y. & London, 579–587.Google Scholar
- Vonshak A, Guy R (1988b) Photoinhibition as a limiting factor in outdoor cultivation ofSpirulina platensis. In: Stadler T, Mollion J, Verdus M-C, Karamanos Y, Morvan H, Christiaen D (eds), Algal Biotechnology Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 365–370.Google Scholar
- Vonshak A, Guy R, Poplawsky R, Ohad I (1988) Photoinhibition and its recovery in two strains of the cyanobacteriumSpirulina platensis. Plant & Cell Physiol. 29: 721–726.Google Scholar
- Vonshak A, Richmond A (1988) Mass production ofSpirulina — an overview. Biomass 15: 233–248.Google Scholar