Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 503–519 | Cite as

Impact of time delay, observational learning, and attentional cuing upon word recognition during integrated small-group instruction

  • Sharon F. Schoen
  • Stacy Ogden


The effects of constant time delay, observational learning opportunities, and differential attentional cuing were examined during the small-group instruction of students in an integrated setting. Three students, one individual with moderate mental retardation and two individuals characterized as at-risk learners, participated in learning sight words through direct instruction and observational-learning conditions. A multiple probe design across three students was combined with a multitreatment design across treatment conditions to assess the impact of instructional variables. Reliability of scoring and procedural integrity were estimated and social validity of outcomes was considered. Findings support the salience of the constant time delay procedure in facilitating word acquisition in small, heterogeneous, and inclusive group learning arrangements. Further, a significant amount of learning through observation occurred for all students under both a general and specific attentional cue condition. A slight but discernible advantage of using the specific cuing strategy of transcribing target and nontarget words was realized.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandura, A. (1968). Social learning theory of identification processes. In D. A. Glass (Eds.),Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand Mc Nally.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, D., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Schuster, J. (1986). Time delay and system of least prompts: A comparison in teaching manual sign production.Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 117–129.Google Scholar
  3. Billingsley, F. F., & Romer, L. T. (1983). Response prompting and the transfer of stimulus control: Methods, research, and a conceptual framework.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 3–12.Google Scholar
  4. Bimbrauer, J. S., Peterson, C. R., & Solnick, J. V. (1974). Design and interpretation of studies of single subjects.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 191–203.Google Scholar
  5. Browder, D. M., Morris, W. W., & Snell, M. E. (1981). Using time delay to teach manual signs to a severely retarded student.Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16, 252–258.Google Scholar
  6. Browder, D. M., Schoen, S. F., & Lentz, F. E. (1987). Learning to learn through observation.Journal of Special Education, 20, 447–461.Google Scholar
  7. Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Morris, L., Doyle, P. M., & Meyer, S. (1990). Teaching sight word reading in a group instructional arrangement using constant time delay.Exceptionality, 1, 81–96.Google Scholar
  8. Halle, J., Marshall, A., & Spradlin, J. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 431–439.Google Scholar
  9. Hartmann, D. P. (1977). Consideration in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 103–116.Google Scholar
  10. Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe techniques: A variation on the multiple baseline.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.Google Scholar
  11. Keel, M. C., & Gast, D. (1992). Small-group instruction for students with learning disabilities: Observational and incidental learning.Exceptional Children, 58, 357–368.Google Scholar
  12. Kinney, P. G., Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W. (1988). The effects of CAI and time delay: A systematic program for teaching spelling.Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 61–72.Google Scholar
  13. Koury, M., & Browder, D. M. (1986). The use of time delay to teach sight words by peer tutors classified as moderately mentally retarded.Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 252–258.Google Scholar
  14. Oliver, P. R. (1983). Effects of teaching different tasks in group versus individual training formats with severely handicapped individuals.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 79–91.Google Scholar
  15. Schoen, S. F., Lentz, F. E., & Suppa, R. (1986). An examination of two prompt fading procedures and opportunities to observe in teaching handicapped preschoolers self-help skills.Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 349–358.Google Scholar
  16. Schoen, S. F., & Sivil, E. O. (1989). A comparison of procedures in teaching self-help skills: Increasing assistance, time delay, and observational learning.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19, 57–72.Google Scholar
  17. Snell, M. E., & Gast, D. L. (1981). Applying time delay procedures to the instruction of the severely handicapped.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 3–14.Google Scholar
  18. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984).Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  19. Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer.Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354.Google Scholar
  20. Voeltz, L. M., & Evans, I. M. (1983). Education validity: Procedures to evaluate outcomes in programs for severely handicapped learners.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1, 3–13.Google Scholar
  21. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Mills, B. M. (1990). Use of choral and individual spelling attentional responses in teaching sight word reading during small group instruction.Remedial and Special Education, 11, 47–58.Google Scholar
  22. Wolery, M., Cybriwsky, C. A., Gast, D. L., & Boyle-Gast, K. (1991). Use of constant time delay and attentional responses with adolescents.Exceptional Children, 57, 462–474.Google Scholar
  23. York, J., Vandercook, T., Mac Donald, C., Heise-Neff, C.,&, Caughie, E. (1992). Feedback about integrating middle-school students with severe disabilities in general education classes.Exceptional Children, 58, 244–258.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon F. Schoen
    • 1
  • Stacy Ogden
    • 1
  1. 1.La Salle UniversityPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations