Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 597–610

Failure to confirm the word-retrieval problem hypothesis in facilitated communication

  • Carol A. Vázquez


Two hypotheses were raised and empirically tested to account for the failure of previous controlled validation studies to find evidence of literacy in nonspeaking persons with autism using facilitated communication: (a) The naming tasks used in other studies have triggered specific “word retrieval” problems, or anomia, and (b) a perceptual problem, visual agnosia, prevents subjects from recognizing objects without touching them. Three nonspeaking autistic children who had used facilitation for at least 2 years were evaluated with four experimentally controlled tasks, over a period of 5 months. In descriptive and object handling tasks, and in a traditional picture identification task, subjects failed to type correct answers when facilitators were blind; one subject, however, occasionally engaged in signing and vocalizations that were context-appropriate. Results reflected a generalized language deficit, rather than isolated word-finding or perceptual difficulties, and were consistent with many previous studies revealing facilitator cuing. Questions are raised about inconsistencies in pseudo-correct scores, a measure of facilitator influence, reported here and in previous research.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis.Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.Google Scholar
  2. Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Saha, S. N., Duncan, J., Gold, D., Hardardottir, M., Karna, E., O'Connor, S., & Rao, S. (1991). “I AMN NOT A UTISTIC ON THJE TYP” (“I'm not autistic on the typewriter”.Disability, Handicap & Society, 6(3), 161–180.Google Scholar
  3. Crossley, R. (1988).Unexpected communication attainments by persons diagnosed as autistic and intellectually impaired. Paper presented at International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Crossley, R., & Remington-Gurney, J. (1992). Getting the words out: Facilitated communication training.Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 29–45.Google Scholar
  5. Denckla, M., & Rudel, R. (1976). Naming of object-drawings by dyslexical and other learning disabled children.Brain and Language, 3, 1–15.Google Scholar
  6. Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  7. German, D. (1982). Word-finding substitutions in children with learning disabilities.Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 13, 223–230.Google Scholar
  8. Hudson, A., Melita, B., & Arnold, N. (1993). Brief report: A case study assessment of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 165–173.Google Scholar
  9. Intellectual Disability Review Panel. (1989).Investigation into the reliability and the validity of the assisted communication technique. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Community Services, Victoria.Google Scholar
  10. Kail, R., & Leonard, L. (1986).Word-finding abilities in language-impaired children (ASHA Monographs No. 25). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language Hearing Association.Google Scholar
  11. Marks, H., Conrad, T., & Hart, P. (1993).Facilitated communication: An empirical demonstration. Paper presented at American Association on Mental Retardation, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  12. Mattis, S., French, J., & Rapin, I. (1975). Dyslexia in children and young adults: Three independent neurological syndromes.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 17, 150–163.Google Scholar
  13. McGregor, K., & Leonard, L. (1989). Facilitating word-finding skills of language-impaired children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 141–147.Google Scholar
  14. Moore, S., Donovan, B., Hudson, A., Dykstra, J., & Lawrence, J. (1993). Brief report: Evaluation of eight case studies of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 531–539.Google Scholar
  15. Rapin, I. (1991). Autistic children: Diagnosis and clinical features.Pediatrics, 87, 751–760.Google Scholar
  16. Rutter, M. (1978). Language disorder and infantile autism. In M. Rutter and E. Schopler (Eds.),Autism: A reappraisal of concepts and treatments. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rutter, M. (1983). Cognitive deficits in the pathogenesis of autism.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 513–531.Google Scholar
  18. Scarborough, H., & Dobrich, W. (1990). Development of children with early language delay.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 70–83.Google Scholar
  19. Shane, H. (1994, April).Making informed decisions about facilitated communication. Paper presented at New York State Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Kiamesha Lake, NY.Google Scholar
  20. Shane, H., & Kearns, K. (1994). An examination of the role of the facilitator in “Facilitated Communication.”American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 48–54.Google Scholar
  21. Simon, E., Toll, D., & Whitehair, P. (1994). A naturalistic approach to the validation of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 647–657.Google Scholar
  22. Vázquez, C. (1994). Brief report: A multitask controlled evaluation of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 369–379.Google Scholar
  23. Wheeler, D., Jacobson, J., Paglieri, R., & Schwartz, A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication.Mental Retardation, 31, 49–60.Google Scholar
  24. Wiig, E., & Semel, E. (1984).Language assessment and intervention for the learning disabled (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Wiig, E., Semel, E., & Nystrom, L. (1982). Comparison of rapid naming abilities in language disabled and academically achieving eight-year-olds.Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 13, 11–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol A. Vázquez
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentState University of New YorkNew Paltz

Personalised recommendations