Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 85–105 | Cite as

Toward a more efficient handling of conformational flexibility in computer-assisted modelling of drug molecules

  • Gerhard Klebe
Article

Summary

Several computational search techniques are described to map the conformation space of flexible organic molecules. A vast multiplicity of geometries is produced that has to be minimized according to a particular energy function. Comparative studies on a nine-membered cyclic lactam are taken as an example. They show that thoroughly tailored search conditions can obtain roughly comparable search efficiencies. Out of the vast multiplicity of geometrically possible and computationally accessible conformers, only a limited number will be of relevance for the problem under consideration. In ligand design for drug discovery, a relative energy ranking determined on isolated conformers is only of limited use for the selection of biologically relevant conformers. This is due to an unsatisfactory transferability of energy scales between different energy functions and the strong modulation of conformational energies of isolated molecules once exposed to a structured molecular environment. A knowledge-based approach, using torsionangle libraries as retrieved for common fragments in small-molecule crystal structures, allows one to map more efficiently the biologically relevant part of conformation space. The relevance of these libraries for the conditions at the binding pocket of a protein is evidenced by experimental data. Sets of well-distributed conformers can be used to compare different drug molecules binding to common targets. Such comparisons reveal new modes of structural superposition of the molecules and consideration of their physicochemical properties leads to interesting pharmacophore hypotheses. They indicate possible binding geometries at the recognition site of a protein and highlight the structural similarities and differences that correlate with changes in the biological properties. Comparisons of GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and of thrombin inhibitors are discussed.

Keywords

Thrombin Drug Molecule Lactam Conformational Flexibility Conformational Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goto, H., Osawa, E. and Yamato, M., Tetrahedron, 49 (1993) 387.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saunders, M., J. Comput. Chem., 12 (1991) 645.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saunders, M., Houk, K.N., Wu, Y.D., Still, W.C., Lipton, M., Chang, G. and Guida, W.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 1419.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osawa, E. and Orville-Thomas, W.J. (Eds.), J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 114 (1994).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pearlman, R.S., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, p. 41.Google Scholar
  6. 6 a.
    Müller, K., Ammann, H.J., Doran, D.M., Gerber, P.R., Gubernator, K. and Schrepfer, G., Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 97 (1988) 655Google Scholar
  7. 6 b.
    Gerber, P.R. and Müller, K., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 251.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Böhm, H.J., Klebe, G., Lorenz, T., Mietzner, T. and Siggel, L., J. Comput. Chem., 11 (1990) 1021.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Peishoff, C.E. and Dixon, J.S., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 565.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Yodo, M., Kataoka, T. and Marshall, G.R., manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Saunders, M. and Jarret, R.M., J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 578.Google Scholar
  12. 11 a.
    Koca, J., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 308 (1994) 13.Google Scholar
  13. 11 b.
    Koca, J. and Carlsen, P.H.J., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 257 (1992) 105, 131.Google Scholar
  14. 11 c.
    Kolossvary, I. and Guida, W.C., J. Comput. Chem., 14 (1993) 691.Google Scholar
  15. 11 d.
    Maranas, C.D. and Floudas, C.A., J. Chem. Phys., 100 (1994) 1247.Google Scholar
  16. 11 e.
    Michel, A.G. and Jeandenans, C., Comput. Chem., 17 (1993) 49.Google Scholar
  17. 11 f.
    Goto, H. and Osawa, E., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. II, (1993) 187.Google Scholar
  18. 11 g.
    Goto, H. and Osawa, E., Tetrahedron Lett., 33 (1992) 1343.Google Scholar
  19. 11 h.
    Goto, H. and Osawa, E., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 104 (1993) 157.Google Scholar
  20. 11 i.
    Perez, J.J., Villar, H.O. and Arteca, G.A., J. Phys. Chem., 98 (1994) 2318.Google Scholar
  21. 11 j.
    Meza, J.C. and Martinez, M.L., J. Comput. Chem., 15 (1994) 627.Google Scholar
  22. 11 k.
    Guarnieri, F. and Wilson, S.R., Tetrahedron, 48 (1992) 4271.Google Scholar
  23. 12 a.
    Noguta, T. and Go, N., Biopolymers, 24 (1985) 427.Google Scholar
  24. 12 b.
    Hagler, A.T., Peptides, 7 (1985) 213.Google Scholar
  25. 12 c.
    Howard, A.E. and Kollman, P.A., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 1669.Google Scholar
  26. 12 d.
    Sun, Y.X. and Kollman, P.A., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 33.Google Scholar
  27. 12 e.
    Byrne, D., Li, J., Platt, E., Robson, B. and Weiner, P., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 67.Google Scholar
  28. 13 a.
    Mayer, D., Naylor, C.B., Motoc, I. and Marshall, G.R., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 1 (1987) 3.Google Scholar
  29. 13 b.
    Iijima, H., Dunbar Jr., J.B. and Marshall, G.R., Proteins, 2 (1987) 330.Google Scholar
  30. 13 c.
    Zabrocki, J., Smith, G.D., Dunbar J.B., Jr., Ijima, H. and Marshall, G.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5875.Google Scholar
  31. 13 d.
    Goodman, J.M. and Still, W.C., J. Comput. Chem., 12 (1991) 1110.Google Scholar
  32. 13 e.
    Ghose, A.K., Jaeger, E.P., Kowalczyk, P.J., Peterson, M.L. and Treasurywala, A.M., J. Comput. Chem., 14 (1993) 1050.Google Scholar
  33. 14.
    SYBYL, Tripos Associates, Inc., St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  34. 15 a.
    Crippen, G. and Havel, T.F., Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation, Research Studies Press, Wiley, New York, NY, 1988.Google Scholar
  35. 15 b.
    Weiner, P.K., Profeta, S., Wipff, G., Havel, T., Kuntz, I.D., Langridge, R. and Kollman, P.A., Tetrahedron, 39 (1983) 1113.Google Scholar
  36. 15 c.
    Crippen, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 351.Google Scholar
  37. 15 d.
    Billeter, M., Howard, A.E., Kuntz, I.D. and Kollman, P.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 8385.Google Scholar
  38. 15 e.
    Clark, D.E., Jones, G., Willet, P., Kenny, P.W. and Glen, R.C., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 197.Google Scholar
  39. 16 a.
    Saunders, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109 (1987) 3150.Google Scholar
  40. 16 b.
    Saunders, M., J. Comput. Chem., 10 (1989) 203.Google Scholar
  41. 16 c.
    Ferguson, D.M. and Raber, D.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 4371.Google Scholar
  42. 16 d.
    Saunders, M. and Jimenezvazquez, H.A., J. Comput. Chem., 14 (1993) 330.Google Scholar
  43. 16 e.
    Morley, S.D., Jackson, D.E., Saunders, M.R. and Vinter, J.G., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 693.Google Scholar
  44. 16 f.
    Freyberg, V.B. and Braun, W., J. Comput. Chem., 12 (1991) 1065.Google Scholar
  45. 17.
    Gerber, P.R., Gubernator, K. and Müller, K., Helv. Chim. Acta, 71 (1988) 1429.Google Scholar
  46. 18.
    Allen, F.H. and Kennard, O., Acc. Chem. Res., 16 (1983) 146.Google Scholar
  47. 19.
    Klebe, G., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 114 (1994) 53.Google Scholar
  48. 20 a.
    MOMO, Beck, H. and Egert, E., University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 1988.Google Scholar
  49. 20 b.
    Smith, A. and Linder, J., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 235.Google Scholar
  50. 21.
    Dauber-Osguthorpe, P., Roberts, V.A., Osguthorpe, D.J., Wolff, J., Genest, M. and Hagler, A.T., Proteins, 4 (1988) 31.Google Scholar
  51. 22.
    Allinger, N.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99 (1977) 8127.Google Scholar
  52. 23.
    Clark, M., Cramer R.D. III, and Van Opdenbosch, N., J. Comput. Chem., 10 (1989) 982.Google Scholar
  53. 24.
    PCModel/MMX, Serena Software, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  54. 25.
    MM2P, Molecular Design Ltd., San Leandro, CA.Google Scholar
  55. 26.
    BIOGRAF, Biodesign, Inc., Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
  56. 27.
    Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy, E.F. and Stewart, J.J.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107 (1985) 3902.Google Scholar
  57. 28.
    Kroon-Batenburg, L.M.J., Kroon, J. and Northolt, M.G., Das Papier, 44 (1990) 639.Google Scholar
  58. 29 a.
    Kroon-Batenburg, L.M.J., Kroon, J. and Northolt, M.G., Polymer Commun., 27 (1986) 290.Google Scholar
  59. 29 b.
    Kroon-Batenburg, L.M.J. and Kroon, J., Biopolymers, 29 (1990) 1243.Google Scholar
  60. 30 a.
    Byrn, S.R., Annu. Rep. Med. Chem., 29 (1986) 346.Google Scholar
  61. 30 b.
    Stephenson, G., Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1994.Google Scholar
  62. 31.
    Maverick, E., Mirsky, K., Knobler, C.B. and Trueblood, K.N., Acta Crystallogr., B47 (1991) 272.Google Scholar
  63. 32.
    Klebe, G., In Jeffrey, G.A. and Piniella, J.F. (Eds.) The Application of Charge Density Research to Chemistry and Drug Design, Nato Advanced Study Institute, Plenum, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 287–318.Google Scholar
  64. 33.
    Weiner, S.J., Kollman, P.A., Nguyen, D.T. and Case, D.A., J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 230.Google Scholar
  65. 34.
    Brooks, B.R., Bruccoleri, R.E., Olafson, B.D., States, D.J., Swaminathan, S. and Karplus, M., J. Comput. Chem., 4 (1983) 187.Google Scholar
  66. 35.
    Böhm, H.J. and Brode, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 7131.Google Scholar
  67. 36.
    Klebe, G., In Bürgi, H.B. and Dunitz, J.D. (Eds.) Structure Correlation, VCH Weinheim, 1994, pp. 543–603.Google Scholar
  68. 37.
    Ricketts, E.M., Bradshaw, J., Hann, M., Hayes, F., Tanna, N. and Ricketts, D.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 33 (1993) 905.Google Scholar
  69. 38.
    Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J.B., Meyer, E.F., Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T. and Tasumi, M., J. Mol. Biol., 112 (1977) 535.Google Scholar
  70. 39.
    Klebe, G. and Mietzner, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 583.Google Scholar
  71. 40.
    DeClerq, P.J., Hoflack, J. and Cauwbergh, S., QCPE Program No. QCMP079, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  72. 41 a.
    Kato, Y., Itai, A. and Iitaka, Y., Tetrahedron, 43 (1987) 5229.Google Scholar
  73. 41 b.
    Kato, Y., Inoue, A., Yamada, M., Tomioka, N. and Itai, A., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 6 (1992) 475.Google Scholar
  74. 41 c.
    Herrmann, R.B. and Herron, D.K., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 511.Google Scholar
  75. 41 d.
    Manaut, M., Sanz, F., Jose, J. and Milesi, M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 371.Google Scholar
  76. 41 e.
    Good, A.C., Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, W.G., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 188.Google Scholar
  77. 41 f.
    Dean, P.M. and Chau, P.L., J. Mol. Graphics, 5 (1987) 152.Google Scholar
  78. 41 g.
    Dean, P.M., Callow, P. and Chau, P.L., J. Mol. Graphics, 6 (1988) 28.Google Scholar
  79. 42.
    Kearsley, S.K. and Smith, G.M., Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1990) 615.Google Scholar
  80. 43.
    Klebe, G., Mietzner, T. and Weber, F., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 751.Google Scholar
  81. 44.
    Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 163.Google Scholar
  82. 45.
    Martin, Y.C., Bures, M.G., Danaher, E.A., DeLazzer, J., Lico, I. and Pavlik, P., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 83.Google Scholar
  83. 46.
    Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 237 (1994) 212.Google Scholar
  84. 47.
    Kopple, K.D., Baures, P.W., Bean, J.W., D'Ambrosio, C.A., Hughes, J.L., Peishoff, C.E. and Eggleston, D.S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 9615.Google Scholar
  85. 48 a.
    McDowell, R.S., Blackburn, B.K., Gadek, T.R., McGee, L.R., Rawson, T., Reynolds, M.E., Robarge, K.D., Somers, T.C., Thorsett, E.D., Tischler, M., Webb R.R. II, and Venuti, M.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 5077.Google Scholar
  86. 48 b.
    Ku, T.W., Ali, F.E., Barton, L.S., Bean, J.W., Bondinell, W.E., Burgess, J.L., Callahan, J.F., Calvo, R.R., Chen, L., Eggleston, D.S., Gleason, J.G., Huffman, W.F., Hwang, S.M., Jakas, D.R., Karash, C.B., Keenan, R.M., Kopple, K.D., Miller, W.H., Newlander, K.A., Nichols, A., Parker, M.F., Peishoff, C.E., Samanen, J.M., Uzinskas, I. and Venslavsky, J.W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115 (1993) 8861.Google Scholar
  87. 48 c.
    Alig, L., Edenhofer, A., Müller, M. and Weller, T., U.S. Patent 5,039,850, 1991.Google Scholar
  88. 48 d.
    Himmelsbach, F., European Patent EP 0 483 667.Google Scholar
  89. 48 e.
    Hirschmann, R., Sprengeler, P.A., Kawasaki, T., Leahy, J.W., Shakespeare, W.C. and Smith A.B., III, J. Am. Chem.-Soc., 114 (1992) 9699.Google Scholar
  90. 49 a.
    Stubbs, M.T. and Bode, W., Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 1 (1993) 431.Google Scholar
  91. 49 b.
    Liu, L.W., Vu, T.K.H., Esmon, C.T. and Coughlin, S.R., J. Biol. Chem., 266 (1991) 16977.Google Scholar
  92. 49 c.
    Banner, D.W. and Hadvary, P., J. Biol. Chem., 266 (1991) 20085.Google Scholar
  93. 50.
    Lyle, T.A., Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 1 (1993) 453.Google Scholar
  94. 51.
    Gasteiger, J., Rudolph, C. and Sadowski, J., Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1990) 537.Google Scholar
  95. 52.
    Brandstetter, H., Turk, D., Hoeffken, H.W., Grosse, D., Stürzebecher, J., Martin, P.D., Edwards, B.F.P. and Bode, W., J. Mol. Biol., 226 (1992) 1085.Google Scholar
  96. 53.
    Hilpert, K., Ackermann, J., Banner, D., Gast, A., Gubernator, K., Hadvary, P., Labler, L., Müller, K., Schmid, G., Tschopp, T. and Van den Waterbeemd, H., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 3889.Google Scholar
  97. 54.
    Hahn, M. and Wipke, W.T., Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 1 (1988) 81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ESCOM Science Publishers B.V 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Klebe
    • 1
  1. 1.BASF AG, Main LaboratoryLudwigshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations