Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 3–29 | Cite as

Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication

  • Miles L. Patterson
Article

Abstract

This article develops a parallel processing model of nonverbal communication that emphasizes the interdependence of behavioral and person perception processes from a functional perspective on social interaction. The form and outcome of the behavioral (encoding) and person perception (decoding) processes are a product of three related elements, including: (1) determinants, (2) the social environment, and (3) cognitive-affective mediators. In this model, the determinants (biology, culture, gender, and personality), in combination with the partner and setting, influence interpersonal expectancies, dispositions, goals, affect, and cognitive resources. In turn, these mediators constrain the attention and cognitive effort applied to behavior management and person perception. In general, fewer cognitive resources and decreased effort will have less effect on the outcome of automatic behavioral (e.g., scripts) and person perception (e.g., impressions based on appearance and nonverbal cues) processes than on more demanding ones. The utility of this theory in integrating behavioral and person perception processes into a single system is discussed.

Keywords

Social Interaction Social Psychology Social Environment Parallel Processing Perception Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P. (1981). The psychological status of the script concept.American Psychologist, 36, 715–729.Google Scholar
  2. Albright, L., Kenny, D.A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.Google Scholar
  3. Alden, L. (1987). Attributional responses of anxious individuals to different patterns of social feedback: Nothing succeeds like improvement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 100–106.Google Scholar
  4. Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In L. B. Alloy (Ed.),Cognitive processes in depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.Google Scholar
  6. Andersen, P. A., & Andersen, J. F. (1984). The exchange of nonverbal intimacy: A critical review of dyadic models.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 327–349.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, N. H. (1974). Information integration: A brief survey. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (pp. 236–305). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance, and affiliation.Sociometry, 28, 289–304.Google Scholar
  10. Arnold, A. P., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). Shyness, self-preoccupation, and the Stroop color and word test.Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 571–573.Google Scholar
  11. Asch, S. E. 1946). Forming impressions of personality.Journal Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230–1240.Google Scholar
  12. Asendorf, J. B. (1987). Videotape reconstruction of emotions and cognitions related to shyness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 542–549.Google Scholar
  13. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J.S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology:Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Baumeister, R. F., & Newman, L. S. (1994). Self-regulation of cognitive processes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 5–19.Google Scholar
  16. Bern, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.)Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bernieri, F. & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Coordinated movement in human interaction. In R. S. Feldman B. Rime (Eds.),Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 410–431). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312–323.Google Scholar
  19. Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of agerelated craniofacial changes on social perception.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.Google Scholar
  20. Bond, M. H. (1972). Effect of an impression set on subsequent behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 301–305.Google Scholar
  21. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.),Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test.Human Communication Research, 4, 129–142.Google Scholar
  23. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989).Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  24. Burgoon, J. K., Dillman, L., & Stern, L. A. (1993). Adaptation in dyadic interaction: Defining and operationalizing patterns of reciprocity and compensation.Communication Theory, 3, 295–316.Google Scholar
  25. Byrne, D. (1971).The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-statements and self-evaluations: A cognitive-response analysis of heterosocial anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3, 249–262.Google Scholar
  27. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.Google Scholar
  28. Campbell, J. D., & Fehr, B. (1990). Self-esteem and perceptions of conveyed impressions: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 122–133.Google Scholar
  29. Cappella, J. N. (1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior: Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 101–132.Google Scholar
  30. Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult-adult and infant-infant dyadic interaction.Communication Monographs, 49, 89–114.Google Scholar
  31. Daly, S. (1978). Behavioral correlates of social anxiety.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 117–120.Google Scholar
  32. Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.American Psychologist, 35, 867–881.Google Scholar
  33. DePaulo, B., Kenny, D. A., Hoover, C., Webb, W., & Oliver, P. V. (1987). Accuracy in person perception: Do people know what kinds of impressions they convey?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 303–315.Google Scholar
  34. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding.Semiotica, 1, 49–98.Google Scholar
  35. Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877–889.Google Scholar
  36. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from categorybased to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1 -74). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991).Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Evolution and facial action in reflex, social motive, and paralanguage.Biological Psychology, 32, 3–100.Google Scholar
  38. Fridlund, A. J. (1994).Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75–90.Google Scholar
  40. Gilbert, D. T., & Jones, E. E. (1986). Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 269–280.Google Scholar
  41. Gilbert, D. T., & Krull, D. S. (1988). Seeing less and knowing more: The benefits of perceptual ignorance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 193–202.Google Scholar
  42. Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733–740.Google Scholar
  43. Greene, J. O., & Sparks, G. G. (1983). Explication and test of a cognitive model of communication apprehension: A new look at an old construct.Human Communication Research, 9, 349–366.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, E. T. (1966).The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
  45. Hall, J. A. (1984).Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  46. Harrison, R. F. (1973). Nonverbal communication. In I. S. Pool, W. Schramm, N. Maccoby, F. Fry, E. Parker, & J. L. Fern (Eds.),Handbook of communication. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  47. Higgins, E. T., & Sorrentino, R. M. (Eds.). (1990).Handbook of motivational and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Humphrey, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing.Psychological Review, 91, 153–184.Google Scholar
  49. Ickes, W., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D. W., & Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to pre-interaction expectancies.Social Cognition, 1, 160–190.Google Scholar
  50. Ickes, W., Robertson, E., Tooke, W., & Teng, G. (1986). Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment, and validation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 66–82.Google Scholar
  51. Ingram, R. E., Cruet, D., Johnson, B. R., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Self-focused attention, gender, gender role, and vulnerability to negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 967–978.Google Scholar
  52. Isen, A. M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull(Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. James, W. (1983).The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published, 1890).Google Scholar
  54. Jussim, L. (1991). Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model.Psychological Review, 98, 54–73.Google Scholar
  55. Keating, C. F. (1985). Human dominance signals: The primate in us. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.),Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 89–108). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  56. Kellerman, K., & Lim, T. (1990). The conversation MOP: III. Timing of scenes in discourse.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1163–1179.Google Scholar
  57. Kenny, D. A. (1991). A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception.Psychological Review, 98, 155–163.Google Scholar
  58. Kenny, D. A., & Albright, L. (1987). Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 102, 390–402.Google Scholar
  59. Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account.Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145–161.Google Scholar
  60. Kenny, D. A., Horner, C., Kashy, D. A., & Chu, L. (1992). Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 88–97.Google Scholar
  61. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). The psychology of being “right”: The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition.Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395–409.Google Scholar
  62. Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletion, 19, 340–348.Google Scholar
  63. Langer, E. J. (1989).Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  64. Leary, M. R. (1983).Understanding social anxiety: Social, personality, and clinical perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Leary, M. R. (1986). The impact of interactional impediments on social anxiety and self-presentation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 122–135.Google Scholar
  66. Leary, M. R., & Atherton, S. C. (1986). Self-efficacy, social anxiety, and inhibition in inter-personal encounters.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 256–267.Google Scholar
  67. Locher, P., Unger, R., Sociedade, P., & Wahl, J. (1993). At first glance: Accessibility of the physical attractiveness stereotype.Sex Roles, 28, 729–743.Google Scholar
  68. Maddux, J. E., Norton, L. W., & Leary, M. R. (1988). Cognitive components of social anxiety: An investigation of the integration of self-presentation theory and self-efficacy theory.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 180–190.Google Scholar
  69. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception.Psychological Review, 90, 215–247.Google Scholar
  70. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior.Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1, 203–207.Google Scholar
  71. Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961–978.Google Scholar
  72. Neisser, U. (1992, June).Distinct systems for “where” and “what”: Reconciling the ecological and representational views of perception. Address at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, San Diego.Google Scholar
  73. Neuberg, S. L. (1989). The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: Attenuating the impact of negative expectancies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 374–386.Google Scholar
  74. Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681–691.Google Scholar
  75. Patterson, M. L. (1976). An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy.Psychological Review, 83, 235–245.Google Scholar
  76. Patterson, M. L. (1982a). A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange.Psychological Review, 89, 231–249.Google Scholar
  77. Patterson, M. L. (1982b). Personality and nonverbal involvement: A functional analysis. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.),Personality, roles, and social behavior. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  78. Patterson, M. L. (1983).Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  79. Patterson, M. L. (1991). A functional approach to nonverbal exchange. In R. S. Feldman B. Rimé (Eds.),Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 458–495). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Patterson, M. L. (1994a). Interaction behavior and person perception: An integrative approach.Small Group Research, 25, 172–188.Google Scholar
  81. Patterson, M. L. (1994b). Strategic functions of nonverbal exchange. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.),Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 273–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  82. Patterson, M. L., Churchill, M. E., Farag, F., & Borden, E. (1991/1992) Impression management, cognitive demand, and interpersonal sensitivity.Current Psychology, 10, 263–271.Google Scholar
  83. Patterson, M. L. & Ritts, V. (1994).Social anxiety: An empirical review and conceptual analysis. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  84. Pilkonis, P. (1977). The behavioral consequences of shyness.Journal of Personality, 45, 596–611.Google Scholar
  85. Rosenthal, R. (1966).Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  86. Rosenthal, R. (1974).On the social psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Further evidence for pygmalion effects and their mediating mechanisms. New York: M.S.S. Information Corporation Modular Publication.Google Scholar
  87. Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there a universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies.Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141.Google Scholar
  88. Rutter, D. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1972). Visual interaction in a group of schizophrenic and depressive patients: A follow-up study.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 57–65.Google Scholar
  89. Schank, R. C. (1982).Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977).Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  91. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and modelPsychological Bulletin, 92, 641–669.Google Scholar
  92. Segrin, C. (1990). A meta-analytic review of social skill deficits in depression.Communication Monographs, 57, 292–308.Google Scholar
  93. Smith, E. R. (1990). Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advancesin social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 1–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  94. Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment.Psychological Review, 99, 3–21.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1994).Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  96. Snyder, M. (1983). The influence of individuals on situations: Implications for understanding the links between personality and social behavior.Journal of Personality, 51, 497–516.Google Scholar
  97. Snyder, M., & Swann, W. (1978). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 148–162.Google Scholar
  98. Sullivan, M. J., & Conway, M. (1989). Negative affect leads to low-effort cognition: Attributional processing for observed social behavior.Social Cognition, 7, 315–337.Google Scholar
  99. Swann, W. B., Jr. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics.Psychological Review, 91, 457–477.Google Scholar
  100. Swann, W., & Snyder, M. (1980). On translating beliefs in action: Theories of ability and their application in an instructional setting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 879–888.Google Scholar
  101. Tickle-Degnen, L. & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its correlates.Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285–293.Google Scholar
  102. Tromsdorff, G., & John, G. (1992). Decoding affective communication in intimate relationships.European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 41–54.Google Scholar
  103. Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution.Psychological Review, 93, 239–257.Google Scholar
  104. Tucker, T. S., & Friedman, H. S. (1993). Sex differences in expressiveness: Emotional expressivenesss, personality, and impressions.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 103–118.Google Scholar
  105. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.Google Scholar
  106. Watson, D. (1989). Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of surprising convergence with self-report.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120–128.Google Scholar
  107. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–498.Google Scholar
  108. Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control.Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.Google Scholar
  109. Wicker, A. W. (1979).An introduction to ecological psychology. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  110. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181–192.Google Scholar
  111. Wright, J. C., & Dawson, V. L. (1988). Person perception and the bounded rationality of social judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 780–794.Google Scholar
  112. Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its its social context.Psychological Review, 93, 322–359.Google Scholar
  113. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miles L. Patterson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Missouri-St. LouisSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations