Full inclusion and students with autism

  • Gary B. Mesibov
  • Victoria Shea


The concept of “full inclusion” is that students with special needs can and should be educated in the same settings as their normally developing peers with appropriate support services, rather than being placed in special education classrooms or schools. According to advocates the benefits of full inclusion are increased expectations by teachers, behavioral modeling of normally developing peers, more learning, and greater selfesteem. Although the notion of full inclusion has appeal, especially for parents concerned about their children's rights, there is very little empirical evidence for this approach, especially as it relates to children with autism. This manuscript addresses the literature on full inclusion and its applicability for students with autism. Although the goals and values underlying full inclusion are laudable, neither the research literature nor thoughtful analysis of the nature of autism supports elimination of smaller, highly structured learning environments for some students with autism.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis.Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.Google Scholar
  2. Harris, S., Handleman, J., Kristoff, B., Bass, L., & Gordon, R. (1990). Changes in language development among autistic and peer children in segregated and integrated preschool settings.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 23–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoyson, M., Jamieson, B., & Strain, P. (1984). Individualized group instruction of normally developing and autistic-like children: The LEAP curriculum model.Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 8, 157–172.Google Scholar
  4. Kaufman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (1995).The illusion of full inclusion. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  5. Madden, N., & Slavin, R. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes.Review of Educational Research, 53, 519–569.Google Scholar
  6. Mesibov, G. B., Schopler, E., & Hearsey, K. A. (1994). Structured teaching. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.),Behavioral issues in autism (pp. 195–207). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Myles, B., Simpson, R., Ormsbee, C. & Erickson, C. (1993). Integrating preschool children with autism with their normally developing peers: Research findings and best practices recommendations.FOCUS on Autistic Behavior, 8, 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Ottensbacher, K., & Cooper, H. (1984). The effect of class placement on the social adjustment of mentally retarded children.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 1–14.Google Scholar
  9. Schopler, E., Mesibov, G. B., & Hearsey, K. (1995). Structured teaching in the TEACCH system. In E. Schopler & E. B. Mesibov (Eds.),Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 243–268). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Strain, P. (1983). Generalization of autistic children's social behavior change: Effects of developmentally integrated and segregated settings.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 23–34.Google Scholar
  11. Strain, P. (1984). Social interactions of handicapped preschoolers in developmentally integrated and segregated settings: A study of generalization effects. In T. Field, J. Roopharine, & M. Segal (Eds.),Friendships in normal and handicapped children (pp. 187–207). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  12. Strain, P., Hoyson, M., & Jamieson, B. (1985). Normally developing preschoolers as intervention agents for autistic-like children: Effect on class deportment and social interaction.Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 9, 105–115.Google Scholar
  13. Strain, P. S., & Kerr, M. M. (1981).Mainstreaming of children in schools. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Wang, M., & Baker, E. (1985–1986). Mainstreaming programs: Design features and effects.Journal of Special Education, 19, 503–521.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary B. Mesibov
    • 1
  • Victoria Shea
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill

Personalised recommendations