Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 737–751 | Cite as

Abnormal classical eye-blink conditioning in autism

  • Lonnie L. Sears
  • Peter R. Finn
  • Joseph E. Steinmetz
Article

Abstract

Cerebellar and limbic system pathologies have been reported in persons with autism. Because these brain areas are involved centrally in the acquisition and performance in classical eyeblink conditioning, this study evaluated conditioning in 11 persons with autism. Compared to matched controls, persons with autism learned the task faster but performed short-latency, high-amplitude conditioned responses. In addition, differences in learning the extinction rates systematically varied with age thus suggesting a developmental conditioning abnormality in autism. The observed pattern of eye-blink conditioning may indicate that persons with autism have the ability to rapidly associate paired stimuli but, depending on processing of certain contextual information, have impairments in modulating the timing and topography of the learned responses. This abnormality may relate to deviant cerebellar-hippocampal interactions. The classical eye-blink conditioning paradigm may provide a useful model for understanding the biological and behavioral bases of autism.

Keywords

Brain Area School Psychology Contextual Information Matched Control Conditioned Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, M. (1991). Microscopic neuroanatomic abnormalities in autism.Pediatrics, Supplement 1, 791–796.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, M., & Kemper, T. (1985). Histoanatomic observations of the brain in early infantile autism.Neurology, 35, 866–874.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, T. W., & Orr, W. B. (1983). Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.Behavioral Brain Research, 8, 49–68.Google Scholar
  5. Berntson, G., & Torello, M. (1982). The paleocerebellum and the integration of behavioral function.Physiological Psychology, 10, 2–12.Google Scholar
  6. Berthier, N. E., & Moore, J. W. (1990). Activity of deep cerebellar nuclear cells during classical conditioning of nictitating membrane extension in rabbits.Experimental Brain Research, 63, 44–54.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, M., Anderson, L., Small, A., Perry, R., Green, W., and Caplan, R. (1982). The effects of haloperidol on learning and behavior in autistic children.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 12, 167–175.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, G. A., McCormick, D. A., Lavond, D. G., & Thompson, R. F. (1984). Effects of lesions of cerebellar nuclei on conditioned behavioral and hippocampal neuronal responses.Brain Research, 291, 125–136.Google Scholar
  9. Courchesne, E. (1987). A neurophysiological view of autism. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.),Neurobiological issues in autism (pp. 285–324). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Courchesne, E. (1991). Neuroanatomic imaging in autism.Pediatrics, 87, 781–790.Google Scholar
  11. Courchesne, E., Hesselink, J., Jernigan, T., & Yeung-Courchesne, C. (1987). Abnormal neuroanatomy in a nonretarded person with autism.Archives of Neurology, 44, 335–341.Google Scholar
  12. Courchesne, E., Yeung-Courchesne, C., Press, G., Hesselink, J., & Jernigan, T. (1988). Hypoplasia of cerebellar verbal lobules VI and VII in infantile autism.New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 1349–1354.Google Scholar
  13. Cromwell, R., Palk, B., & Folshee, J. (1961). Studies in activity level: V. The relationships among eyelid conditioning, intelligence, activity level, and age.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 65, 744–748.Google Scholar
  14. Franks, V., & Franks, C. (1962). Conditionability in defectives and in normals related to intelligence and organic deficit: The application of a learning theory model to a study of the learning process in the mental defective. In B. Richards (Ed.),Proceedings of the London Conference on the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency (1960), Dagenham, England: May and Baker.Google Scholar
  15. Gaffney, G., Tsai, L., Kuperman, S., & Minchin, S. (1987). Cerebellar structure in autism.American Journal of Diseases in Children, 141, 1330–1332.Google Scholar
  16. Gormezano, I., Kehoe, E. J., & Marshall, B. S. (1983). Twenty years of classical conditioning in the rabbit. In J. M. Sprague & A. N. Epstein (Eds.),Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 197–275). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ivry, R. B., Keele, S. W., Diener, H. C. (1988). Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution.Experimental Brain Research, 73, 167–180.Google Scholar
  18. Jansen, J. (1969). On cerebellar evolution and organization from the point of view of a morphologist. In R. Llinas (Ed.),Neurobiology and cerebellar evolution and development. Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  19. Kimble, G. (1967).Foundations of conditioning and learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  20. Lavond, D. G., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1989). Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex.Behavioral Brain Research, 33, 113–164.Google Scholar
  21. Lavond, D. G., Steinmetz, J. E., Yokaitis, M. H., & Thompson, R. F. (1987). Reacquisition of classical conditioning after removal of cerebellar cortex.Experimental Brain Research, 67, 569–593.Google Scholar
  22. Leiner, H. C., Leiner, A. L., & Dow, R. S. (1986). Does the cerebellum contribute to mental skills?Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 443–454.Google Scholar
  23. Leiner, H. C., Leiner, A. L., & Dow, R. S. (1989). Reappraising the cerebellum: What does the hindbrain contribute to the forebrain?Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 998–1008.Google Scholar
  24. Leiner, H. C., Leiner, A. L., & Dow, R. S. (1991). The human cerebro-cerebellar system: its computing, cognitive, and language skills.Behavioral Brain Research, 44, 113–128.Google Scholar
  25. Lincoln, A. J., Courchesne, E., Harms, L., & Allen, M. (1993). Contextual probability evaluation in autistic, receptive developmental language disorder, and control children: Eventrelated brain potential evidence.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 39–58.Google Scholar
  26. McCormick, D. A., & Thompson, R. F. (1984a). Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response.Science, 223, 296–299.Google Scholar
  27. McCormick, D. A., & Thompson, R. F. (1984b). Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during acquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membraneeyelid response.Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 2811–2822.Google Scholar
  28. Moyer, J. R. Jr., Deyo, R. A., & Disterhoft, J. F. (1990). Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eyeblink conditioning in rabbits.Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 243–252.Google Scholar
  29. Ohlrich, E., & Ross, L. (1968). Acquisition and differential conditioning of the eyelid response in normal and retarded children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 181–193.Google Scholar
  30. Perrett, S., Ruiz, B., & Mauk, M. (1993). Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses.Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1708–1718.Google Scholar
  31. Port, R. L., Romano, A. G., Steinmetz, J. E., Mikhail, A. A., & Patterson, M. M. (1986). Retention and acquisition of classical trace conditioned responses by rabbits with hippocampal lesions.Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 745–752.Google Scholar
  32. Ritvo, E., Freeman, B. J., Scheibel, A., Duong, T., Robinson, H., Guthrie, D., & Ritvo, A. (1986). Lower Purkinje cell counts in the cerebella of four autistic subjects: Initial finding of the UCLA-NSAC Autopsy Research report.American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 862–866.Google Scholar
  33. Sasaki, K. (1985). Cerebro-cerebellar interactions and organizations of a fast and stable hand movement: Cerebellar participation in voluntary movement and motor learning. In J. Bloedel, J. Dichgans, & Precht (Eds.),Cerebellar functions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Sears, L. L., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1990a). Acquisition of classically conditioned-related activity in the hippocampus is affected by lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus.Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 681–690.Google Scholar
  35. Sears, L. L., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1990b). Haloperidol impairs classically conditioned nictitating membrane responses and conditioning-related cerebellar interpositus nucleus activity in rabbits.Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 36, 821–830.Google Scholar
  36. Solomon, P. R., Stowe, G. T., & Pendleberry, W. W. (1989). Disrupted eyelid conditioning in a patient with damage to cerebellar afferents.Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 898–902.Google Scholar
  37. Solomon, P. R., VanderSchaaf, E. R., Norbe, A. C., Weisz, D. J., & Thompson, R. F. (1986). Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 729–744.Google Scholar
  38. Steinmetz, J. E., Lavond, D. G., Ivkovich, D., Logan, C. G., & Thompson, R. F. (1992). Disruption of classical eyelid conditioning after cerebellar lesions: Damage to a memory trace system or a simple performance deficit?Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4403–4426.Google Scholar
  39. Steinmetz, J. E., Logue, S. F., & Steinmetz, S. S. (1992). Rabbit classically conditioned eyelid responses do not reappear after interpositus nucleus lesion and extensive post-lesion training.Behavioral Brain Research, 51, 103–114.Google Scholar
  40. Woodruff-Pak, D. S., & Thompson, R. F. (1988). Cerebellar correlates of classical conditioning across the life span. In P. Baltes, D. Featherman, & R. Lerner (Eds.),Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 9). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Yeo, C. H., Hardiman, M. J., & Glickstein, M. (1985). Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane responses of the rabbit: I. Lesions of the cerebellar nuclei.Experimental Brain Research, 60, 87–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lonnie L. Sears
    • 1
  • Peter R. Finn
    • 1
  • Joseph E. Steinmetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Program in Neural ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations