Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 177–197 | Cite as

Why and when do some language-impaired children seem talkative? A study of initiation in conversations of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder

  • Dorothy Bishop
  • Joanne Hartley
  • Fiona Weir
Article

Abstract

Six language-impaired children fitting the clinical picture of semantic-pragmatic disorder (mean age 11 years) engaged in conversations with adults in four situations varying in terms of familiarity of the interlocutor (familiar or unfamiliar) and type of setting (interview or toy exploration). These children did not produce more utterances or longer utterances than normally developing children of similar age or ability, but they were more likely to produce utterances that served the conversational function of initiating, rather than responding or acknowledging. This tendency was most pronounced in the toy setting. There was a nonsignificant trend for control children to initiate more with a familiar than with an unfamiliar adult, but no such tendency in the semantic-pragmatic group. A high rate of initiations in children with semantic-pragmatic disorder cannot be regarded as an unusual behavior provoked by the demands of the interview setting, as it is even more apparent during toy exploration, where the child is under less pressure to respond to adult questions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, C., & Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder. I. Exchange structure, turntaking, repairs and cohesion.British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 211–239.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard-Opitz, V. (1982). Pragmatic analysis of the communication behavior of an autistic child.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 99–109.Google Scholar
  3. Bish, D. V. M. (1989). Autism, Asperger's syndrome and semantic-pragmatic disorder: Where are the boundaries?British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 107–121.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, D. V. M., & Adams, C. (1989). Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder. II. What features lead to a judgment of inappropriacy?British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 241–263.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, D. V. M., & Adams, C. (1991). What do referential communication tasks measure? A study of children with specific language impairment.Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 199–215.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, D. V. M., & Adams, C. (1992). Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 119–129.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, D. V. M., & Rosenbloom, L. (1987). Classification of childhood language disorders. In W. Yule & M. Rutter (Eds.),Language development and disorders (Clinics in Developmental Medicine, Nos. 101-2), pp. 16–41. London: Mac Keith.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.Google Scholar
  9. Coulthard, M. (1985).An introduction to discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982).British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Windsor; NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  11. Fey, M. E., & Leonard, L. B. (1983). Pragmatic skills of children with specific language impairment. In T. M. Gallagher & C. A. Prutting (Eds.),Pragmatic assessment and intervention issues in language. San Diego: College-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Goodman, R. (1989). Infantile autism: A syndrome of multiple primary deficits?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19, 409–424.Google Scholar
  13. Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J., & Kirk, W. D. (1968).Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lister Brook, S., & Bowler, D. (1992). Autism by another name? Semantic and pragmatic impairments in children.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22, 61–82.Google Scholar
  15. McTear, M. (1985).Children's conversation. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Rapin, I., & Allen, D. (1983). Developmental language disorders: Nosologic considerations. In U. Kirk (Ed.),Neuropsychology of language, reading and spelling (pp. 155–184). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1977).Raven's Coloured Matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
  18. Shields, J. (1991). Semantic-pragmatic disorder: A right hemisphere syndrome?British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 383–392.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothy Bishop
    • 1
  • Joanne Hartley
    • 1
  • Fiona Weir
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ManchesterEngland

Personalised recommendations