Journal of Mathematical Sciences

, Volume 95, Issue 4, pp 2328–2420 | Cite as

Skew-injective modules

  • A. A. Tuganbaev
Article
  • 48 Downloads
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Ahsan, “Rings all of whose cyclic modules are quasi-injective,”Proc. London Math. Soc.,27, 425–439 (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Ahsan, “Onπ-injective modules,”Tamkang J. Math.,10, No. 2, 223–229 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Ahsan and E. Enochs, “Rings all of whose torsion quasi-injective modules are injective,”Glasgow Math. J.,25, No. 2, 219–227 (1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Alamelu, “On quasi-injective modules over Noetherian rings,”J. Indian Math. Soc.,39, No. 1–4, 121–130 (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Al-Khassi and P. F. Smith, “Modules with chain conditions on superfluous submodules,”Commun. Algebra,19, No. 8, 2331–2351 (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Anderson and K. Fuller,Rings and Categories of Modules, Springer, Berlin (1973).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Ara and J. K. Park, “On continuous semiprimary rings,”Commun. Algebra,19, 1945–1957 (1991).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. I. Beidar, V. N. Latyshev, V. T. Markov, A. V. Mikhalev, L. A. Skornyakov, and A. A. Tuganbaev, “Associative rings,” In:Progress in Science and Technology: Series on Algebra, Topology, and Geometry. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn. VINITI, Vol. 22, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1985), pp. 3–116.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. F. Birkenmeier, “On the cancellation of quasi-injective modules,”Commun. Algebra,4, No. 2, 101–109 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. F. Birkenmeier, “Baer rings and quasi-continuous rings have a MDSN,”Pacific J. Math.,97, No. 2, 283–292 (1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. K. Boyle, “Hereditary QI-rings,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,192, 115–120 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. K. Boyle, “Injectives containing no proper quasi-injective modules,”Commun. Algebra,4, No. 8, 775–785 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. K. Boyle and K. R. Goodearl, “Rings over which certain modules are injective,”Pacific J. Math.,58, No. 1, 43–53 (1975).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. A. Byrd, “Some characterizations of uniserial rings,”Math. Ann.,186, 163–170 (1970).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. A. Byrd, “Rings whose quasi-injective modules are injective,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,33, 235–240 (1972).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. A. Byrd, “When are quasi-injectives injective,”Can. Math. Bull.,15, 599–600 (1972).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. A. Byrd, “Right self-injective rings whose essential right ideals are two-sided,”Pacific. J. Math.,82, No. 1, 23–41 (1972).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Cailleau, “Quasi-injectivite de certains modules sur leur anneau d'endomorphismes,”Can. J. Math.,23, 811–815 (1971).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Cailleau and G. Renault, “Anneau associe a une somme directe infinie de modules quasi-injectifs,”Arch. Math.,21, 561–566 (1970/71).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. P. Camillo and M. F. Yousif, “CS-modules with ACC or DCC on essential submodules,”Commun. Algebra,19, 655–662 (1991).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. P. Camillo and M. F. Yousif, “Continuous rings with ACC on annihilators,”Can. Math. Bull.,34, 462–464 (1991).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. Chaptal, “Sur les modules quasi-injectifs,”C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,264, A173-A175 (1967).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. W. Chatters and C. R. Hajarnavis, “Rings in which every complement right ideal is a direct summand,”Q. J. Math. Oxford,28, No. 109, 61–80 (1977).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. W. Chatters and S. M. Khuri, “Endomorphism rings of modules over nonsingular CS-rings,”J. London Math. Soc.,21, No. 3, 434–444 (1980).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. F. Damiano, “A left PCI ring is left Noetherian,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,77, No. 1, 11–14 (1979).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. V. Dung, D. V. Huynh, and R. Wisbauer, “Quasi-injective modules with ACC or DCC on essential submodules,”Arch. Math.,53, 252–255 (1989).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. V. Dung and P. F. Smith, “Hereditary CS-modules,”Math. Scand.,71, 173–180 (1992).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. V. Dung and P. F. Smith, “∑-CS-modules,”Commun. Algebra,22, 83–93 (1994).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Faith,Algebra: Rings, Modules, and Categories I, Springer, Berlin (1973).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. Faith,Algebra II, Springer, Berlin (1976).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. Faith, “On hereditary rings and Boyle's conjecture,”Arch. Math.,27, No. 2, 113–119 (1976).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Faith, “The maximal regular ideal of self-injective and continuous rings splits off,”Arch. Math.,44, 511–521 (1985).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. Faith and Y. Utumi, “Quasi-injective modules and their endomorphism rings,”Arch. Math.,15, 166–174 (1964).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Faith and Y. Utumi, “Baer modules,”Arch. Math.,15, 266–270 (1964).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    T. G. Faticoni, “On quasi-projective covers,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,278, 101–113 (1983).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    L. Fuchs, “On quasi-injective modules,”Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa,23, 541–546 (1969).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    L. Fuchs, “The cancellation property for modules,”Lect. Notes Math.,246, 191–212 (1972).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    K. R. Fuller, “Relative projectivity and injectivity classes determined by simple modules,”J. London Math. Soc.,5, 423–431 (1972).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    K. R. Fuller, “Rings of left invariant module type,”Commun. Algebra,6, 153–167 (1978).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    K. R. Fuller and D. A. Hill, “On quasi-projective modules via relative projectivity,”Arch. Math.,21, 369–373 (1970).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. C. Goel and S. K. Jain, “Semiperfect rings with quasi-projective left ideals,”Math. J. Okayama Univ.,19, No. 1, 39–43 (1976).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    V. K. Goel and S. K. Jain, “π-Injective modules and rings whose cyclics areπ-injective,”Commun. Algebra,6, No. 1, 59–73 (1978).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    V. K. Goel, S. K. Jain, and S. Singh, “Rings whose cyclic modules are injective or projective,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,53, No. 1, 16–18 (1975).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. S. Golan, “Characterization of rings using quasi-projective modules,”Israel J. Math.,8, 34–38 (1970).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    J. S. Golan, “Characterization of rings using quasi-projective modules (II),”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,28, 237–243 (1971).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. S. Golan, “Quasi-perfect modules,”Q. J. Math. Oxford,22, 173–182 (1971).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    J. S. Golan, “Characterization of rings using quasi-projective modules (III),”Proc Amer. Math. Soc.,31, 401–408 (1972).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    J. S. Golan and Z. Papp, “Cocritically nice rings and Boyle's conjecture,”Commun. Algebra,8, No. 18, 1775–1798 (1980).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    K. R. Goodearl, “Direct sum properties of quasi-injective modules,”Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,82, No. 1, 108–110 (1976).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    J.-M. Goursaud and L. Jeremy, “Un anneaux regulier continu a gauche et ℵ0-continu a droite est continu,”C. R., Acad. Sci. Ser. A.,283, 807-A808 (1976).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    V. E. Govorov, “Skew-injective modules,”Algebra Logika,2, No. 6, 21–49 (1963).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. Harada, “Note on quasi-injective modules,”Osaka J. Math.,2, 351–356 (1965).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    M. Harada, “Supplementary remarks on categories of indecomposable modules,”Osaka J. Math.,9, 49–55 (1972).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    M. Harada, “On quasi-injective modules with a chain condition over a commutative ring,”Osaka J. Math.,9, 421–426 (1972).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    M. Harada, “On modules with an extending property,”Osaka J. Math.,19, No. 1, 203–215 (1982).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. Harada, “Self-mini-injective rings,”Osaka J. Math.,19, No. 3, 587–597 (1982).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    M. Harada,Factor Categories with Applications to Direct Decomposition of Modules, Marcel Dekker, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    M. Harada, “On maxi-quasi-projective modules,”J. Austral. Math. Soc.,35, 357–368 (1983).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    M. Harada and T. Ishii, “On endomorphism rings of Noetherian quasi-injective modules,”Osaka J. Math.,9, 217–223 (1972).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    M. Harada and K. Oshiro, “On an extending property of direct sums of uniform modules,”Osaka J. Math.,18, No. 3, 767–785 (1981).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    A. Harmanci and P. F. Smith, “Finite direct sums of CS-modules,”Houston J. Math.,19, 523–532 (1993).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    P. Herrmann, “Self-projective modules over valuation rings,”Arch. Math.,43, 332–339 (1984).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    J. L. G. Hermandez and J. L. G. Pardo, “On endomorphism rings of quasi-proective modules,”Math. Z.,196, 87–108 (1987).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    D. A. Hill, “Semiperfectq-rings,”Math. Ann.,200, 113–121 (1973).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    D. A. Hill, “The structure of semilocal HQ rings,”J. London Math. Soc.,12, No. 2, 129–132 (1976).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    D. A. Hill, “Decomposition theorems forq *-rings,”Can. Math. Bull.,23, No. 2, 155–160 (1980).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    D. A. Hill, “Quasi-projective modules over hereditary Noetherian prime rings,”Osaka J. Math.,20, 767–777 (1983).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    D. V. Huynh, “A right countably ∑-CS-ring with ACC or DCC on projective principal right ideals is left artinian and QF-3,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,347, No. 8, 3131–3139 (1995).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    D. V. Huynh and N. V. Sanh, “A right continuous right weakly SI-ring is semisimple,”Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.,51, 479–488 (1995).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    D. V. Huynh and R. Wisbauer, “Self-projective modules withπ-injective factor modules,”J. Algebra,153, 13–21 (1992).Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    S. K. Jain, S. R. Lopez-Permouth, and S. T. Rizvi, “Continuous rings with ACC on essentials are Artinian,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,108, 583–586 (1990).Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    S. K. Jain and D. S. Malik, “q-Hypercyclic rings,”Can. J. Math.,37, No. 3, 452–466 (1985).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    S. K. Jain and S. Mohamed, “Rings whose cyclic modules are continuous,”J. Indian Math. Soc.,42, No. 1–4, 197–202 (1978).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    S. K. Jain, S. Mohamed, and S. Singh, “Rings in which every right ideal is quasi-injective,”Pacific J. Math.,31, 73–79 (1969).Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    S. K. Jain and B. J. Müller, “Semiperfect rings whose proper cyclic modules are continuous,”Arch. Math.,37, No. 2, 140–143 (1981).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    S. K. Jain and H. H. Saleh, “Rings whose (proper) cyclic modules have cyclicπ-injective hulls,”Arch. Math.,48, 109–115 (1987).Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    S. K. Jain and H. H. Saleh, “Rings with finitely generated injective (quasi-injective) hulls of cyclic modules,”Commun. Algebra,48, 109–115 (1987).Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    S. K. Jain and G. Singh, “Local rings whose proper cyclics are continuous,”J. Indian Math. Soc.,47, 161–168 (1983).Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    S. K. Jain and S. Singh, “On pseudo injective modules and self pseudo injective rings,”J. Math. Sci.,2. 23–31 (1967).Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    S. K. Jain and S. Singh, “On quasi-injective and pseudo injective modules,”Can. Math. Bull.,18, No. 3, 359–366 (1975).Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    S. K. Jain and S. Singh, “Rings with quasi-projective left ideals,”Pacific J. Math.,60, No. 1, 169–181 (1975).Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    S. K. Jain, S. Singh, and G. Symonds, “Rings whose proper cyclic modules are quasi-injective,”Pacific J. Math.,67, No. 2, 467–472 (1976).Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    L. Jeremy, “Sur les modules et anneaux quasi-continuous,”C. R., Acad. Sci. Ser. A.,273, 80–83 (1971).Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    L. Jeremy, “Anneaux engendres par leurs idempotents. quasi-continuite deMsu(I),”C. R., Acad. Sci. Ser. A,276, 1541–1543 (1973).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    L. Jeremy, “Modules et anneaux quasi-continuous,”Can. Math. Bull.,17, 217–228 (1974).Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    R. E. Johnson and E. T. Wong, “Quasi-injective modules and irreducible rings,”J. London Amer. Math. Soc.,36, 260–268 (1961).Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    U. S. Kahlon, “Problem of Krull-Schmidt-Remak-Azumaya-Matlis,”J. Indian Math. Soc.,35, 255–261 (1971).Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    M. A. Kamal and B. J. Müller, “Extending modules over commutative domains,”Osaka J. Math.,25, 531–538 (1988).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    M. A. Kamal and B. J. Müller, “The structure of extending modules over Noetherian rings,”Osaka J. Math.,25, 539–551 (1988).Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    M. A. Kamal and B. J. Müller, “Torsion free extending modules,”Osaka J. Math.,25, 825–832 (1988).Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    T. Kanzaki, “Some dual properties on modules,”Proc. Jpn. Acad.,47, 765–768 (1971).Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    F. Kasch,Moduln und Ringe, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart (1977).Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    M. N. Khan, “A continuous ring in which every large right ideal is two-sided,”Riv. Mat. Univ. Parama,2, 277–280 (1973).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    G. B. Klatt and L. S. Levy, “Pre-self-injectives rings,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,137, 407–409 (1969).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    A. Koehler, “Quasi-projective covers and direct sums,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,24, 656–658 (1970).Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    A. Koehler, “Rings for which every cyclic module is quasi-projective,”Math. Ann.,189, 311–316 (1970).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    A. Koehler, “Quasi-projective and quasi-injective modules,”Pacific J. Math.,3, 713–720 (1971).Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    A. Koehler, “Rings with quasi-injective cyclic modules,”Q. J. Math. Oxford,25, 51–55 (1974).Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    A. Koehler, “Pre-self-injective duo rings,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,60, 31–34 (1976).Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    K. Koh, “On quasi-injective ideals in prime rings,”Amer. Math. Monthly,75, 388–389 (1968).Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    M. Kutami, “ℵ-continuous modules,”Osaka J. Math.,21, 31–37 (1984).Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    M. Kutami and K. Oshiro, “Strongly semiprime rings and non-singular quasi-injective modules,”Osaka J. Math.,17, No. 1, 41–50 (1980).Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    I. Lambek,Lectures on Rings and Modules, Blaisdell, Waltham (1966).Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Y. Lee and N. S. Tung, “A note on continuous rings,”Arch. Math.,63, 30–32 (1994).Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    L. S. Levy, “Commutative rings whose homomorphic images are self-injective,”Pacific J. Math.,18, 149–153 (1966).Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    V. T. Markov, A. V. Mikhalev, L. A. Skornyakov, and A. A. Tuganbaev, “Modules,” In:Progress in Science and Technology: Series on Algebra, Topology, and Geometry. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn. VINITI, Vol. 19, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1981), pp. 31–134.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    V. T. Markov, A. V. Mikhalev, L. A. Skornyakov, and A. A. Tuganbaev, “Endomorphism rings and submodule lattices,” In:Progress in Science and Technology: Series on Algebra, Topology, and Geometry. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn. VINITI, Vol. 21, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1983), pp. 183–254.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    A. P. Mishina, “On automorphisms and endomorphisms of Abelian groups,”Vestn. MGU, Mat. Mekh., No. 4, 39–43 (1962).Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    A. P. Mishina, “On automorphisms and endomorphisms of Abelian groups,”Vestn. MGU, Mat. Mekh., No. 1, 62–66 (1972).Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Y. Miyashita, “On quasi-injective modules,”J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ.,18, 158–187 (1964/65).Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Y. Miyashita, “Quasi-proective modules, perfect modules and a theorem for modular lattices,”J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ.,19, 86–110 (1966).Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    S. H. Mohamed, “q-Rings with chain conditions,”J. London Amer. Math. Soc.,2, 455–460 (1970).Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    S. H. Mohamed, “Semilocalq-rings,”Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.,1, No. 3, 419–424 (1970).Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    S. H. Mohamed, “Rings whose homomorphic images areq-rings,”Pacific J. Math.,2, 455–460 (1970).Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    S. H. Mohamed, “On PCI-rings,”J. Univ. Kuwait Sci.,2, 21–23 (1975).Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    S. H. Mohamed, “Rings with dual continuous right ideals,”J. Austral. Math. Soc.,33, No. 3, 287–294 (1982).Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    S. H. Mohamed and T. Bouhy, “Continuous modules,”Arabian J. Sci. Eng.,2, No 2, 107–122 (1976/77).Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    S. H. Mohamed and B. J. Müller, “Decomposition of dual continuous modules,”Lect. Notes Math.,700, 87–94 (1979).Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    S. H. Mohamed and B. J. Müller, “Direct sums of dual continuous modules,”Math. Z.,178, No. 2, 225–232 (1981).Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    S. H. Mohamed and B. J. Müller, “Dual continuous modules over commutative Noetherian rings,”Commun. Algebra,16, 1191–1207 (1988).Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    S. H. Mohamed and B. J. Müller,Continuous and Discrete Modules, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1990).Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    S. H. Mohamed, B. J. Müller, and S. Singh, “Quasi-dual continuous modules,”J. Austral. Math. Soc.,39, 287–299 (1985).Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    S. H. Mohamed and S. Singh, “Weakq-rings,”Can. J. Math.,29, No. 4, 687–695 (1977).Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    S. H. Mohamed and S. Singh, “Weakg-rings with zero singular ideal,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,76, No. 1, 25–30 (1979).Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    A. Mohammad, “Rings whose proper homomorphic images are leftg-rings,”Tamkang J. Math.,9, No. 2, 265–268 (1978).Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    A. Mohammad and S. Singh, “Rings in which every finitely generated left ideal is quasi-projective,”J. Indian Math. Soc.,40, No. 1–4, 195–205 (1976).Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    B. J. Müller and S. T. Rizvi, “On the decomposition of continuous modules,”Can. Math. Bull.,25, No. 3, 296–301 (1982).Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    B. J. Müller and S. T. Rizvi, “On the existence of continuous hulls,”Commun. Algebra,10, No. 17, 1819–1838 (1982).Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    B. J. Müller and S. T. Rizvi, “On injective and quasi-continuous modules,”J. Pure Appl. Algebra,25, 296–301 (1982).Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    M. Okado, “On the decomposition of extending modules,”Math. Jpn.,29, 939–941 (1984).Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    K. Oshiro, “Continuous modules and quasi-continuous modules,”Osaka J. Math.,20, 681–694 (1983).Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    K. Oshiro, “Lifting modules, extending modules and their applications to QF-rings,”Hokkaido Math. J.,13, 310–338 (1984).Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    K. Oshiro, “Lifting modules, extending modules and their applications to generalized uniserial rings,”Hokkaido Math. J.,13, 339–346 (1984).Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    B. L. Osofsky, “Rings all of whose finitely generated modules are injective,”Pacific J. Math.,14, 645–650 (1964).Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    B. L. Osofsky, “Noninjective cyclic modules,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,19, 1383–1384 (1968).Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    B. L. Osofsky, “Noncommutative rings whose cyclic modules have cyclic injective hulls,”Pacific J. Math.,25, 331–340 (1968).Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    B. L. Osofsky, “Endomorphism rings of quasi-injective modules,”Can. J. Math.,19, 1383–1384 (1968).Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    B. L. Osofsky, “Non-quasi-continuous quotients of finitely generated quasi-continuous modules,” In:Ring Theory. Proc. Bien. Ohio State-Denison Conf., Granville, Ohio, May, 1992, Singapore (1993).Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    B. L. Osofsky and P. F. Smith, “Cyclic modules whose quotients have all complement submodules direct summands,”J. Algebra,139, 342–354 (1991).Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    S. S. Page, “Continuous rings and rings of quotients,”Can. Math. Bull.,21, No. 3, 319–324 (1978).Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    K. M. Rangaswamy, “Some remarks on the endomorphism rings of quasi-projective modules,”Publ. Math. Debrecen,26, No. 1–2, 71–73 (1979).Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    K. M. Rangaswamy and N. Vanaja, “Quasi-projectives in Abelian and module categories,”Pacific J. Math.,43, 221–238 (1972).Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    G. Renault, “Anneau associe a un module injectif,”Bull Sci. Math.,92, 53–58 (1968).Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    G. Renault, “Sur les anneaux tels que tout produit de copies d'un module quasi-injectif soit quasi-injectif,”C. R., Acad. Sci. Ser. A,271, 12–14 (1970).Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    A. del Rio Mateos, “Self-injective endomorphism rings of quasi-injective modules,”Commun. Algebra,17, No. 11, 2611–2634 (1989).Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    S. T. Rizvi, “Commutative rings for which every continuous module is quasi-injective,”Arch. Math.,50, 435–442 (1988).Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    S. T. Rizvi and M. F. Yousif, “On continuous and singular modules,”Lect. Notes Math.,1448, 116–124 (1990).Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    E. de Robert, “Projectifs et injectifs relatifs,”C. R., Acad. Sci. Ser. A,286, 361–364 (1969).Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    S. Singh, “On pseudo-injective modules and self-pseudo-injective rings,”J. Math. Sci. India,2, 23–31 (1967).Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    S. Singh, “On pseudo-injective modules,”Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma,9, 59–65 (1968).Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    S. Singh, “Quasi-injective and quasi-projective modules over hereditary Noetherian prime rings,”Can. J. Math.,26, 1173–1185 (1974).Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    S. Singh, “Modules over hereditary Noetherian prime rings,”Can. J. Math.,27, No. 4, 867–883 (1975).Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    S. Singh, “Modules over hereditary Noetherian prime rings. II,”Can. J. Math.,28, No. 1, 73–82 (1975).Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    S. Singh, “Dual continuous modules over Dedekind domains,”J. Univ. Kuwait (Sci.),7, 1–9 (1980).Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    S. Singh, “Semi-dual continuous modules over Dedekind domains,”J. Univ. Kuwait,11, 33–39 (1984).Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    L. W. Small, “Semihereditary rings,”Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,73, No. 5, 656–658 (1967).Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    P. F. Smith, “Decomposing modules into projectives and injectives,”Pacific J. Math.,76, No. 1, 247–266 (1978).Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    P. F. Smith, “CS-modules and weak CS-modules,”Lect. Notes Math.,1448, 99–115 (1990).Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    P. F. Smith and A. Tercan, “Generalizations of CS-modules,”Commun. Algebra,21, No. 6, 1809–1847 (1993).Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    B. Stenström,Rings of Quotients: An Introduction to Methods of Ring Theory, Springer, Berlin (1975).Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Y. Suzuki, “On automorphisms of an injective module,”Proc. Jpn. Acad.,44, 120–124 (1968).Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    T. Takeuchi, “On direct modules,”Hokkaido Math. J.,1, 168–177 (1972).Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    M. L. Teply, “Pseudo-injective modules which are not quasi-injective,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,49, 305–310 (1975).Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    C. Tisseron, “Sur un classe d'anneaux,”C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. A,270, 1354–1356 (1970).Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    C. Tisseron, “Sur deux classes d'anneaux,”C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. A,277, 413–415 (1973).Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    C. Tisseron, “Sur les anneaux tels que tout produit de copies d'un module quasi-injectif soit un module quasi-injectif,”Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.,105, 37–71 (1975).Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    C. Tisseron, “Sur les anneaux tels que tout produit de copies d'un module quasi-injectif soit un module quasi-injectif,”Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.,110, 15–28 (1976).Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    A. K. Tiwaxy and S. A. Paramhans, “On pc-rings,”Kyugpook Math. J.,17, No. 2, 153–155 (1977).Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    A. K. Tiwary and B. M. Pandeya, “Pseudo projective and pseudo injective modules,”Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.,9, No. 9, 941–949 (1978).Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Quasi-injective and skew-injective modules,”Vestn. MGU, Mat., Mekh., No. 2, 61–64 (1977).Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “The structure of modules that are nearly injective,”Sib. Mat. Zh.,18, No. 4, 890–898 (1977).Google Scholar
  172. 172.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Modules that are nearly injective,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,32, No. 2, 233–234 (1977).Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Modules over hereditary Noetherian prime rings,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,32, No. 4, 267–268 (1977).Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “The structure of modules that are nearly projective,”Mat. Sb.,106, No. 4, 554–565 (1978).Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Pseudoinjective modules and extension of automorphisms,”Tr. Sem. im. I. G. Petrovskogo, No. 4, 241–248 (1978).Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Characterizations of rings using skew-injective and skew-projective modules,”Vestn. MGU, Mat. Mekh., No. 3, 48–51 (1979).Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Skew-projective modules,”Vestn. MGU, Mat., Mekh., No. 5, 43–47 (1979).Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Rings whose factor-rings are skew-injective,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,35, No. 2, 223–224 (1980).Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “On quasi-projective modules,”Sib. Mat. Zh.,21, No. 3, 177–183 (1980).Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Skew-projective modules,”Sib. Mat. Zh.,21, No. 3, 109–113 (1980).Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “On self-injective rings,”Izv. Vuzov, Mat., No. 12, 71–74 (1980).Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Integrally closed rings,”Mat. Sb.,115, No. 4, 544–559 (1981).Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Integrally closed Noetherian rings,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,36, No. 5, 195–196 (1981).Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Skew-injective rings,”Izv. Vuzov, Mat., No. 9, 50–53 (1981).Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Rings over which all cyclic modules are skew-injective,”Tr. Sem. im. I. G. Petrovskogo, No. 6, 257–262 (1981).Google Scholar
  186. 186.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Skew-injective modules,”Mat. Zametki,31, No. 3, 447–456 (1982).Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Skew-injective rings,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,37, No. 5, 201–202 (1982).Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Distributive rings and endodistributive modules,”Ukr. Mat. Zh.,38, No. 1, 63–67 (1986).Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Distributive series rings,”Mat. Zametki,39, No. 4, 518–528 (1986).Google Scholar
  190. 190.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Series rings and weak global dimension,”Izv. Vuzov, Mat., No. 11, 70–78 (1987).Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Endomorphism rings and distributivity,”Mat. Zametki,56, No. 4, 141–152 (1994).Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Endomorphism ring of a distributive module,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,50, No. 1, 215–216 (1995).Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Endomorphisms of distributive modules,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,50, No. 3, 167–168 (1995).Google Scholar
  194. 194.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Right or left distributive rings,”Mat. Zametki,58, No. 4, 604–627 (1995).Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Distributive semiprime rings,”Mat. Zametki,58, No. 5, 736–761 (1995).Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Cyclic skew-injective modules,” In:Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obshch., Vol. 57, Moscow (1996), pp.199–217.Google Scholar
  197. 197.
    A. A. Tuganbaev, “Hereditaryπ-injective rings,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,52, No. 2, 185–186 (1997).Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Y. Utumi, “On continuous regular rings and semisimple self-injective rings,”Can. J. Math.,12, 597–605 (1960).Google Scholar
  199. 199.
    Y. Utumi, “On continuous regular rings,”Can. Math. Bull.,4, 63–69 (1961).Google Scholar
  200. 200.
    Y. Utumi, “On continuous rings and self-injective rings,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,118, 158–173 (1965).Google Scholar
  201. 201.
    Y. Utumi, “On continuity and self-injectivity of complete regular rings,”Can. J. Math.,12, 597–605 (1960).Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    N. Vanaja, “Characterization of rings using extending and lifting modules,” In:Ring Theory. Proc. Bien. Ohio State — Denison Conf., Granville, Ohio, May, 1992, Singapore (1993).Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    K. Varadarajan and P. R. Wani, “Modules over endomorphism rings (II),”Acta Math. Hung.,53, No. 3–4, 309–337 (1989).Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    R. Wisbauer,Foundations of Module and Ring Theory, Gordon and Breach, Philadelphia (1991).Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    E. T. Wong, “Atomic quasi-injective modules,”J. Math. Kyoto Univ.,3, 295–303 (1964).Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    E. T. Wong, “Endomorphisms of the quasi-injective hull of a module,”Can. Math. Bull.,13, 149–150 (1970).Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    L. E. T. Wu and J. P. Jans, “On quasi-projectives,”Ill. J. Math.,11, 439–448 (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Tuganbaev

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations