Advertisement

Systems practice

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 231–261 | Cite as

Developing total systems intervention (TSI): The critical review mode

  • Jennifer Wilby
Papers

Abstract

Total systems intervention (TSI) is a meta-methodology which interprets and brings into action a range of problem solving methodologies, viewing problem solving as a process of intervention where practitioners can learn about and manage complex interacting issues. When first presented, TSI was the framework that evolved from one of many possible operationalisations of critical systems thinking. From these beginnings, TSI (as one practical implementation of the principles of CST) now continues its development into a methodology for use by problem solvers in all situations, not just the organisational-enterprise setting. This paper presents a detailed operationalisation of the critical review mode, the framework of which may also be of use in the operationalisation of the other modes in TSI.

Key words

critical systems thinking total systems intervention critical review mode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Flood, R. L. (1990).Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Flood, R. L. (1993). Practising freedom: Designing, debating and disemprisoning.OMEGA 21, 7–16.Google Scholar
  3. Flood, R. L. (1995a). Total systems intervention (TSI): A reconstitution.J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46, 174–191.Google Scholar
  4. Flood, R. L. (1995b). An improved version of the process of total systems intervention.Syst. Pract. 8, 329–333.Google Scholar
  5. Flood, R. L. (1995c).Solving Problem Solving, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991a).Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991b).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. (1995a). Enhancing the process of methodology choice in Total Systems Intervention (TSI) and improving chances of tackling coercion.Syst. Pract. 8, 377–408.Google Scholar
  9. Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. (1995b). Diversity management: Theory in action.Syst. Pract. 8, 469–482.Google Scholar
  10. Flood, R. L., and Ulrich, W. (1990). Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners.Syst. Pract. 3, 7–29.Google Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1985). Reason without revolution? Habermas's theorie des kommunikativen handelns. In Bernstein, R. J. (ed.),Habermas and Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Gregory, W. J. (1992).Critical Systems Thinking and Pluralism: A New Constellation, Ph.D. thesis, City University, London.Google Scholar
  13. Gregory, W. J. (1996). Dealing with diversity. In Flood, R. L. and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum, London.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1976).Communication and the Evolution of Society, English ed., 1979, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (1984a).The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1984b).The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: The Critique of Functionalist Reason, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, M. C. (1985). Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach.Int. J. Gen. Syst. 10, 135–151.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, M. C. (1990). Beyond a system of systems methodologies.J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41, 657–668.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, M. C. (1991a).Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum, London.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, M. C. (1991b). The origins and nature of critical systems thinking.Syst. Pract. 4, 131–149.Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies.J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35, 473–486.Google Scholar
  23. Midgley, G. (1992a). The sacred and the profane in critical systems thinking.Syst. Pract. 5, 5–16.Google Scholar
  24. Midgley, G. (1992b). Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science.Syst. Pract. 5, 147–172.Google Scholar
  25. Midgley, G. (1995). What is this thing called critical systems thinking? In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.),Proceedings of the United Kingdom Systems Society Conference on Systems Science: Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, London.Google Scholar
  26. Oliga, J. (1988). Methodological foundations of systems methodologies.Syst. Pract. 1, 87–112.Google Scholar
  27. Payne, S. L. (1992). Critical systems thinking: A challenge or dilemma in its practice?Syst. Pract. 5, 237–250.Google Scholar
  28. Ragsdell, G. (1995). The case for critical creativity in TSI: A necessity, a practical possibility, or a contradiction in terms? In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.),Proceedings of the United Kingdom Systems Society Conference on Systems Science: Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, London.Google Scholar
  29. Ragsdell, G. (1996). Creativity and problem solving. In Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum, London.Google Scholar
  30. Ulrich, W. (1983).Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy, Haupt, Berne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  31. Wilby, J. (1995). Operationalising the critical review mode. In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.),Proceedings of the United Kingdom Systems Society Conference on Systems Science: Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Wilby
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Systems Studies, School of ManagementUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations