Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 281–302

Effects of reward and nonreward on frustration and attention in attention deficit disorder

  • Virginia I. Douglas
  • Penny A. Parry
Article

Abstract

The effects of reward schedule (100%, 50%, and 30%) and termination of rewards (extinction) on 30 attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADD-H) and 30 normal children were studied using measures of frustration (speed/strength of lever pulling) and attention (reaction time to a light signal). ADD-Hs pulled harder on the lever than controls during extinction and on the lowest (30%) partial schedule, providing empirical evidence that they respond with greater frustration than normals when expected rewards fail to appear. The groups did not differ on the attentional measure on 100% reward. However, the partial schedules appeared to have an alerting or motivating effect on the controls, so that they responded more quickly and consistently than ADD-Hs on the partial schedules. Findings are discussed with reference to opposing theories regarding the nature of the abnormal response of ADD-Hs to reward.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.Google Scholar
  3. Amsel, A. (1962). Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: Some recent history and a theoretical extension.Psychological Review, 69, 306–328.Google Scholar
  4. Amsel, A. (1990). Arousal, suppression, and persistence: Frustration theory, attention, and its disorders.Cognition and Emotion, 4, 239–268.Google Scholar
  5. Barkley, R. A. (1989). The problem of stimulus control and rule-governed behavior in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. In L. M. Bloomingdale & J. Swanson (Eds.), Attention deficit disorder:Current concepts and emerging trends in attentional and behavioral disorders of childhood (pp. 203–228). Toronto: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, M. L. (1972). Univariate versus multivariate tests in repeated-measures experiments.Psychological Bulletin, 77, 446–452.Google Scholar
  7. Douglas, V. I. (1984). The psychological processes implicated in ADD. In L. M. Bloomingdale (Ed.),Attention deficit disorder Diagnostic, cognitive, and therapeutic understanding (pp. 147–162). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, V. I. (1985). The response of ADD children to reinforcement: theoretical and clinical implications. In L. M. Bloomingdale (Ed.),Attention deficit disorder. Identification, course and rationale (pp. 49–66). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  9. Douglas, V. I. (1988). Cognitive deficits in children with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. In L. M. Bloomingdale & J. Sergeant (Eds.),Attention deficit disorder: Criteria, cognition, intervention. A book supplement to the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, No. 5. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, V. I. (1989). Can Skinnerian theory explain attention deficit disorder? A reply to Barkley. In L. M. Bloomingdale & J. Swanson (Eds.),Attention deficit disorder: Current concepts and emerging trends in attentional and behavioral disorders of childhood (pp. 235–254). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, V. I., & Parry, P. A. (1983). Effects of reward on delayed reaction time task performance of hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 313–326.Google Scholar
  12. Firestone, P., & Douglas, V.I. (1975). The effects of reward and punishment on reaction times and autonomic activity in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 201–215.Google Scholar
  13. Freibergs, V., & Douglas, V. I. (1969). Concept learning in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 388–395.Google Scholar
  14. Gray, J. A. (1982).The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary.Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 493–509.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, J. A., & Smith, P. T. (1969). An arousal-decision model for partial reinforcement and discrimination learning. In R. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.),Animal discrimination learning (pp. 243–272). Orlandoℝndon: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Haenlein, M., & Caul, W. F. (1987). Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: A specific hypothesis of reward dysfunction.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 356–363.Google Scholar
  18. Izard, C. E., & Dougherty, L. M. (1983). Two complementary systems for measuring facial expressions of emotions in infants and children. In C. E. Izard (Ed.),Measuring emotions in infants and children. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mackintosh, N. J. (1976).The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Parry, P. A., & Douglas, V. I. (1983). Effects of reinforcement on concept identification in hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 327–340.Google Scholar
  21. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.Google Scholar
  22. Pelham, W. E., Milich, R., & Walker, J. L. (1986). Effects of continuous and partial reinforcement and methylphenidate on learning in children with attention deficit disorder.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 319–325.Google Scholar
  23. Quay, H. (1986). The behavioral reward and inhibition systems in childhood behavior disorder. In L. M. Bloomingdale (Ed.),Attention deficit disorder: Research in treatment, psychopharmacology and attention (Vol. III). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  24. Ryan, T. J., & Watson, P. (1968). Frustrative nonreward theory applied to children's behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 69, 111–125.Google Scholar
  25. Watson, P. (1968). Response measure effects in children as a function of type and schedule of reward.Psychonomic Science, 13, 217–218.Google Scholar
  26. Watson, P. (1969). Reward schedule, response measure, and attentional deficiency: A reanalysis.Psychonomic Science, 16, 70–72.Google Scholar
  27. Watson, P., Ryan, T. J., & McEwan, R. C. (1967). Response speed in retardates as a function of CA, MA, IQ and reinforcement schedule.Psychonomic Science, 8, 61–62.Google Scholar
  28. Wender, P. H. (1971).Minimal brain dysfunction in children. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  29. Wender, P. H. (1972). The minimal brain dysfunction syndrome in children.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 155, 55–72.Google Scholar
  30. Wender, P. H. (1974). Some speculations concerning a possible biochemical basis of minimal brain dysfunction.Life Sciences, 14, 1605–1621.Google Scholar
  31. Wigal, T., Swanson, J. M., Douglas, V. I., Wigal, S. B., Stoiber, C. M., & Fulbright, K. K. (1993).Reinforcement effects on frustration and persistence in children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  32. Wilton, R. N. (1972). The role of information in the emission of observing responses and partial reinforcement acquisition phenomena.Learning and Motivation, 3, 479–499.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia I. Douglas
    • 1
  • Penny A. Parry
    • 2
  1. 1.Montreal Children's Hospital Research InstituteMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Children's Advocate for City of VancouverVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations