Piecewise Hermite interpolation in one and two variables with applications to partial differential equations

Ahlin, A. C.: A bivariate generalization of Hermite's interpolation formula. Math. Comp.18, 264–273 (1964).Google Scholar

Beckenbach, E., andR. Bellman: Inequalities. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1961.Google Scholar

Birkhoff, G., andC. de Boor: Piecewise polynomial interpolation and approximation. Approximation of functions.H. L. Garabedian, ed. New York: Elsevier 1965.Google Scholar

—, andA. Priver: Hermite interpolation errors for derivatives. J. Math. and Phys. (to appear).Google Scholar

Bramble, J. H., andB. E. Hubbard: On the formulation of finite difference analogs of the Dirichlet problem for Poisson's equation. Numer. Math.4, 313–327 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Céa, Jean: Approximation variationnelle des problemès aux limites. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble).14, 345–444 (1964).Google Scholar

Ciarlet, P. G., M. H. Schultz, andR. S. Varga: Numerical methods of highorder accuracy for nonlinear boundary value problems. I. One dimensional problem. Numer. Math.9, 394–430 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collatz, L.: The numerical treatment of differential equations. Third edition, pp. 348 ff. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1959Google Scholar

Davis, Philip J.: Interpolation and approximation. New York: Blaisdell Publishing Co. 1963.Google Scholar

Herbold, R. J.: Consistent quadrature schemes for the numerical solution of boundary value problems by variational techniques. Doctoral Thesis. Case Western Reserve University. 1967.Google Scholar

Kellogg, R. B.: Difference equations on a mesh arising from a general triangulation. Math. Comp.18, 203–210 (1964).Google Scholar

—— An error estimate for elliptic difference equations on a convex polygon. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.3, 79–90 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nitsche, Joachim, andJohannes C. C. Nitsche: Error estimates for the numerical solution of elliptic differential equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.5, 293–306 (1960).Google Scholar

Peano, G.: Resto nelle formule di quadratura expresso con un integrale definito. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend.22, 562–569 (1913).Google Scholar

Petryshyn, W. V.: Direct and iterative methods for the solution of linear operator equations in Hilbert space. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.105, 136–175 (1962).Google Scholar

Polsky, N. I.: Projection methods in applied mathematics. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR.143, 787–790 (1962).Google Scholar

Pólya, G.: Sur une interprétation de la méthode des différence finies qui peut fournir des bornes supérieures ou inférieures. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris.235, 995–997 (1952).Google Scholar

Sard, Arthur: Linear approximation. Mathematical Survey 9. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society 1963.Google Scholar

Schultz, M. H., andR. S. Varga:L-splines. Numer. Math.10, 345–369 (1967).Google Scholar

Simonsen, W.: On numerical differentiation of functions of several variables. Skand. Aktuarietidskr.42, 73–89 (1959).Google Scholar

Stancu, D. D.: L'expression du reste dans quelques formules de dérivation partielle numérique. Acad. R. P. Romîne Fil. Cluj Stud. Cerc. Mat.11, 371–380 (1960).Google Scholar

—— The remainder of certain linear approximation formulas in two variables. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. Ser. B.1, 137–163 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Synge, J. L.: The hypercircle in mathematical physics, pp. 168 ff. London: Cambridge Univ. Press 1957.Google Scholar

Varga, R. S.: Hermite interpolation-type Ritz methods for two-point boundary value problems. Numerical solution of partial differential equations. (365–373). New York: Academic Press 1966.Google Scholar

Weinberger, H. F.: Upper and lower bounds for eigenvalues by finite difference methods. Comm. Pure Appl. Math.9, 613–623 (1956).Google Scholar

Yosida, K.: Functional analysis. (458 pp.) New York: Academic Press 1965.Google Scholar