Sh. scholtensii und Sh. manolovii — zwei zur Untergruppe D zu stellende provisorische Shigella-Typen

  • Wolfgang Stenzel
Article
Received:

Zusammenfassung

  1. 1.

    Auf Grund ihrer Darmpathogenität beim Menschen, ihrer Schleimhautpathogenität beim Versuchstier, ihres gewebsimmunologischen Verhaltens und gewisser kulturell-biochemischer Eigenschaften müssen die Serotypen 792 („Katwijk“) und 147 („Shigella 13“) in die Shigella-Untergruppe D gestellt werden. Für den Katwijk-Typ wird die provisorische Benennung in Sh.scholtensii, für Serotyp 147 die provisorische Benennung in Sh. manolovii vorgeschlagen.

     
  2. 2.

    Es wird weiterhin empfohlen, den Keratoconjunctivalversuch am Meerschweinchen als kardinales Kriterium mit in die Shigella-Definition einzubeziehen und die Definition der Untergruppe D auch auf Salicin spaltende Serotypen zu erweitern, insbesondere, wenn diese auch noch weitere geringfügige Atypien aufweisen.

     
  3. 3.

    Es wird zur Diskussion gestellt, die Typen der Untergruppe D in Sh. metadysenteriae umzubenennen.

     
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Brown, H. C., J. T. DuncanandT. W. Henry: The fermentation of salts of organic acids as an aid to the differentiation of bacterial types. J. Hyg. (Lond.)23, 1 (1924/25).Google Scholar
  2. Carlquist, P. R.: A biochemical test for separating paracolon groups. J. Bact.71, 339 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter, K. P.: Persönliche Mitteilung (1961).Google Scholar
  4. Castellani, A.: “Metadysentery”, with remarks on a chroinc type. Lancet1929 II, 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castellani, A.: Die Klassifizierung der Dysenteriebazillen. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt. Orig.125, 37 (1932).Google Scholar
  6. Castellani, A.: A little-known type of chronic colitis (chronic metadysentery). J. trop. Med. Hyg.36, 109 (1933).Google Scholar
  7. Castellani, A.: Some little known bacteria. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt. Orig.157, 74 (1951/52).Google Scholar
  8. Castellani, A., etA. J. Chalmers: Sur la classification de certains groupes de bacilles aérobies de l'intestin humain. Ann. Inst. Pasteur34, 600 (1920).Google Scholar
  9. Castellani, A., andM. Douglas: Biochemical characters and agglutinative reactions of the metadysentery bacilli. J. trop. Med. Hyg.40, 197 (1937).Google Scholar
  10. Cefalû, M., eA. Gullotti: Un nuovo tipo di Shigella boydii Sierotipo provvisorio Ca/792. Nuovi Ann. ig.4, 237 (1953).Google Scholar
  11. Christensen, W. B.: Hydrogen sulfide production and citrate utilization in the differentiation of the enteric pathogens and the coliform bacteria. Res. Bull. Weld Co. Health Dept., Greeley, Colo.1, 3 (1949); zit. nachEdwards et al. Amer. J. med. Technol.22, 28 (1956).Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, P. H.: Hydrogen sulphide production by bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol.8, 397 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards, P. R., and W. H.Ewing: Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Minneapolis, Minn. 1955.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, P. R., M. A. Fife andW. H. Ewing: Newer biochemical methods in the recognation of Shigellae and Salmonellae. Amer. J. med. Technol.22, 28 (1956).Google Scholar
  15. Enterobaoteriaceae Subcommittee: Report of the Enterobacteriaceae Subcommittee of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Association of Microbiological Societies. Internat. Bull. bact. Nomenclature Taxonomy8, 25 (1958a).Google Scholar
  16. Enterobacteriaceae Subcommittee: Supplement to the third report on the Shigella group. Internat. Bull. bact. Nomenclature Taxonomy8, 93 (1958b).Google Scholar
  17. Ewing, W. H.: Serological relationships betwen Shigella and coliform cultures J. Bact.66, 333 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ewing, W. H., R. W. Reavis andB. R. Davis: Provisional Shigella serotypes. Canad. J. Microbiol.4, 89 (1958).Google Scholar
  19. Ewing, W. H., M. W. Taylor andM. C. Hucks: The Alkalescens-Dispar group. Publ. Hlth Rep. (Wash.)65, 1474 (1950).Google Scholar
  20. Floyd, T. M.: Provisional Shigella boydii infestions in Egyptian children. J. Bact.67, 738 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Frantzen, E.: Biochemical and serological studies on Alkalescens and Dispar strains. Acta path. microbiol. scand.27, 236 (1950a).Google Scholar
  22. Frantzen, E.: Further serological studies on Alkalescens and Dispar strains. Acta path. microbiol. scand.28, 103 (1950b).Google Scholar
  23. Friewer, F., andH. J. Shaughnessy: Lead semisolid agar, a medium for use in the identification of the enteric group of bacteria. Amer. J. clin. Path.14, Techn. Sect.8, 1 (1944).Google Scholar
  24. Gekker, V. D., J. A. Belaya andE. T. Melnik: Experimental keratoconjunctivitis as a model for the study of dysentery. J. hyg. epidem. microbiol. imm. (Prag)1, 70 (1957).Google Scholar
  25. Kauffmann, F.: On the classification of the Enterobacteriaceae. Acta path. microbiol. scand.26, 879 (1949).Google Scholar
  26. Kauffmann, F.: Enterobacteriaceae, 2.Aufl. Kopenhagen 1954.Google Scholar
  27. Kauffmann, F., andW. Petersen: The biochemical group and type differentiation of Enterobacteriaceae by organic acids. Acta path. microbiol. scand.38, 481 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Koser, S. A.: Utilization of the salts of organic acids by the Colon-Aerogenes group. J. Bact.8, 493 (1923).Google Scholar
  29. Koser, S. A.: Correlation of citrate utilization by members of the Colon-Aerogenes group with other differential characteristics and with habitat. J. Bact.9, 59 (1924).Google Scholar
  30. Luria, S. E., andJ. W. Burrous: Hybridization between Escherichia coli and Shigella. J. Bact.74, 461 (1957).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mackel, D. C., L. F. Langley andL. A. Venice: The use of the guinea-pig conjunctivae as an experimental model for the study of virulence of Shigella organisms. Amer. J. Hyg.73, 219 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Manolov, D. G.: A study of some questions of pathogenicity and immunity in dysentery using experimental models of Shigella keratoconjunctivitis in guinea pigs. J. hyg. epidem. microbiol. imm. (Prag)1, 322 (1957).Google Scholar
  33. Manolov, D. G.: A new type of the genus Shigella — “Shigella 13”. J. hyg. epidem. microbiol. imm. (Prag)3, 184 (1959).Google Scholar
  34. Myers, J. T.: The production of hydrogen sulphide by bacteria. J. Bact.5, 231 (1920).Google Scholar
  35. Neter, E.: The genus Shigella and Shigellosis. Amer. J. dig. Dis.15, 213 (1948).Google Scholar
  36. Piéchaud, D., etS. Szturm-Rubinrsten: Pouvoir pathgène expérimental des bacilles dysentériques chez le cobaye. Ann. Inst. Pasteur97, 511 (1959).Google Scholar
  37. Rauss, K., u.A. Vertényi: Ein coliformes Bakterium mit Sh. flexneri-verwandten Antigeneigenschaften. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt. Orig.174, 352 (1959).Google Scholar
  38. Roelcke, K.: Die Kruse-Sonne-(E-) Ruhr. Bakteriologie, Serologie, Klinik und Epidemiologie. Stuttgart 1943.Google Scholar
  39. Santarenko, I. V.: Ob atipicnych bakterijach dizenterijinoj gruppy. Z. Mikrobiol. (Mosk.)4, 91 (1958); zit. nach Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt. Ref.170, 289 (1959).Google Scholar
  40. Scholtens, R. Th.: Een onbekend type dysenteriebacterie als oorzaak eener epidemie. Ned. T. Geneesk.84, 4613 (1940).Google Scholar
  41. Seeliger, H.: Ein wenig bekannter Escherichia-Typ als wahrscheinliche Ursache ruhrähnlicher Erkrankungen. Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr.135, 526 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seeliger, H.: Untersuchungen Über die O-Antigene der Escherichia coli-Gruppen O 28, O 42 und des pathogenen „Katwijk“-Typs. Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr.139, 55 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Serény, B.: Experimental Shigella keratoconjunctivitis. Acta microbiol. Acad. Sci. hung.2, 293 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Serény, B.: Experimental keratoconjunctivitis shigellosa. Acta microbiol. Acad. Sci. hung.4, 367 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Serény, B.: Acquired natural immunity following recovery from keratoconjunctivitis shigellosa. Acta microbiol. Acad. Sci. hung.5, 343 (1958).Google Scholar
  46. Serény, B.: Sh. sonnei cultures fermenting salicin. Acta microbiol. Acad. Sci. hung.6, 217 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Serény, B.: Keratoconjunctivitis shigellosa. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt. Orig.178, 325 (1960).Google Scholar
  48. Simmons, J. S.: A cultural medium for differentiating organisms of typhoid-colon aerogenes group and for isolation of certain fungi. J. infect. Dis.39, 209 (1926).Google Scholar
  49. Siroko, I. A.: Keratokonjunktivit u morskoj svink kak bioproba pri identifikaciji dizenterijinych bakteriji. Z. Mikrobiol. (Mosk.)4, 71 (1958); zit. nach Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt. Ref.170, 286 (1959).Google Scholar
  50. Stenzel, W.: Untersuchungen Über die Schleimhautpathogenität einiger Enterobacteriaceen-Gruppen im Bingelschen Versuch. Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr.147, 123 (1960).Google Scholar
  51. Stenzel, W.: Esch. coli-Shigella-Hybriden und ihre Schleimhautpathogenität. Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr.147, 521 (1961).Google Scholar
  52. Stenzel, W.: Die Schleimhautpathogenität der bakteriellen Ruhrerreger im Tierversuch. (In Vorbereitung 1962.)Google Scholar
  53. Stuart, C. A., andR. Rustigian: Further studies on the Eikman reactions of Shigella cultures. J. Bact.46, 105 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stuart, C. A., A. Zimmerman, M. Baker andR. Rustigian: Eijkman relationships of the coliform and related bacteria. J. Bact.43, 557 (1942).Google Scholar
  55. Szturm-Rubinsten, S., etD. Piéchaud: Facteur kérato-conjonctival des Shigella. Ann. Inst. Pasteur95, 763 (1958).Google Scholar
  56. Sztuem-Rubinsten, S., D. Piéchaud etP. Thibault: Inoculation conjonctivale au cobaye de bacilles dysentériques. Ann. Inst. Pasteur93, 463 (1957).Google Scholar
  57. Tilley, F. W.: Variations in hydrogen sulphide production by bacteria. J. Bact.8, 115 (1923a).Google Scholar
  58. Tilley, F. W.: The relation between chemical composition of peptones and hydrogen sulphide production by bacteria. J. Bact.8, 287 (1923b).Google Scholar
  59. Vaughn, R. H., J. T. Osborne, G. T. Wedding, J. Tabachnick, C. G. Beisel andT. Braxton: The utilization of citrate by Escherichia coli. J. Bact.60, 119 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Weil, W. J., andJ. Black: Species differentiation within the genus Shigella by test for the reduction of trimethylamine oxide. J. Bact.47, 575 (1944).Google Scholar
  61. Wood, A. J., andE. W. Baird: Reduction of trimethylamine oxyde by bacteria. 1. The Enterobacteriaceae. J. Fisheries Res. Board Canada6, 194 (1943).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Stenzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Hygiene-Institut der Universität HeidelbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations