Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Growth of dimorphic human pathogenicfungi on media containing cycloheximide and chloramphenicol

  • 38 Accesses

  • 5 Citations

Summary

Studies of 24 strains ofBlastomyces dermatitidis confirmed previously published results that the yeast-phase of this fungus is more sensitive than the mycelial-phase to cycloheximide and chloramphenicol.

Studies of 5 strains each ofHistoplasma capsulatum, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis andSporotrichum schenckii show that that these species also have a similar yeast-phase mycelial -phase sensitivity differential in regard to these antibiotics.

A cycloheximide resistant strain ofB. dermatitidis was developed from a sensitive strain.

The experimental results support the general practice of using 0.5 mg/ml cycloheximide and 0.05 mg/ml chloramphenicol in media for the isolation of the four fungi at 25° C. The results indicate, however, that some strains would not be recovered at 37° C with similar concentrations of these antibiotics.

It is recommended that a concentration of not more than 0.2 mg/ml chloramphenicol should be used to preserve sputum which is subsequently to be cultured forB. dermatitidis, Histoplasma capsulatum, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis orS. schenckii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    McDonough, E. S., Ajello, L., Georg, L. K. &Brinkman, S. (1960) In vitro effects of antibiotics on the yeast phase of Blastomyces dermatitidis and other fungi, J. Lab. & Clin. Med50 116–119.

  2. 2.

    Fuentes, C. A., Trespalacios, F., Baquero, G. F. &Aboulafia, R. (1952) Effects of acti-dione on mold contaminants and on human pathogens, Mycologia44 170–175.

  3. 3.

    Georg, L. K. (1953) Use of a cycloheximide medium for isolation of dermatophytes from clinical materials, Arch. Derm. Syph.67 355–361.

  4. 4.

    Ajello, L. &Getz, M. E. (1954) Recovery of dermatophytes from shoes and shower stalls, J. Invest. Derm.22 17–21.

  5. 5.

    Sharvill, D. &Talbot, J. M. (1954) Cycloheximide in the isolation of dermatophytes, Brit. J. Derm.66 214–217.

  6. 6.

    Fegeler, F. (1956) Untersuchungen zur Epidemiologie der Epidermophytien mit besonderer Berücksichtigung desTrichophyton rubrum (Castellani), Arch. klin. exp. Derm.203 570–576.

  7. 7.

    Rosenthal, S. A., Baer, R. L., Litt, L. Z., Rogachefsky, H. &Furnari, D. (1956) Studies on the dissemination of fungi from the feet of subjects with and without diseases of the feet, J. Invest. Dermat.26 41–47.

  8. 8.

    Rosenthal, S. A. &Furnari, D. (1957) The use of cycloheximide-chloramphenicol medium in routine culture for fungi, J. Invest. Derm.28 367–371.

  9. 9.

    Adam, W. &Steitz, K. (1958) Zur Wirkung von Cycloheximid auf Pilzkulturen, Z. Haut-u. Geschlechtskr.25 153–161.

  10. 10.

    Coudert, J. &Murat, M. (1954) Intéret du milieu de Sabouraud à la chloramycétine pour l'isolement des dermatophytes et des champignons levuriformes. Ann. Biol Clin.12(3–4), 185–186.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mc Donough, E.S., Georg, L.K., Ajello, L. et al. Growth of dimorphic human pathogenicfungi on media containing cycloheximide and chloramphenicol. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 13, 113–120 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02155508

Download citation

Keywords

  • General Practice
  • Chloramphenicol
  • Resistant Strain
  • Cycloheximide
  • Similar Concentration