, Volume 27, Issue 12, pp 1406–1408 | Cite as

Protection of chlorophyll a from photo-oxidation byβ-carotene in binary mixture of organic solvents

  • G. Tomita
  • T. Oku
Specialia Chimica, Biochimica, Biophysica


Chlorophyll Organic Solvent Binary Mixture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Das photoxytadive Ausbleichen des Chlorophylls a wird durch die Gegenwart desβ-Carotins gehemmt. Die Hemmwirkung desβ-Carotins und die Wechselwirkung zwischen Chlorophyll a undβ-Carotin werden vom Lösungsmittel kontrolliert.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Claes, Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.3, 585 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Claes, Z. Naturforsch.16b, 445 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Fujimori andR. Livingston, Nature, Lond.180, 1036 (1957).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Chessin, R. Livingston andT. G. Truscott, Trans. Faraday Soc.62, 1519 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Mathis, Photochem. Photophys.9, 55 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    C. S. Foote andR. W. Denny, J. Am. chem. Soc.90, 6233 (1968).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    G. R. Seely andR. G. Jensen, Spectrochim. Acta21, 1835 (1965).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    The change in wavelength of the FRANCK-CONDON absorption is caused by 3 kinds of shifts; 1. the red shift ofBayliss 10 depending on the oscillator strength and the polarizability of the solute, 2. the shift depending on the difference in the interaction of the excited and ground state dipole moments of the solute with the induced field in the solvent and 3. the shift depending on the interaction of the dipole moments with static part of the polarizability of the solvent (N. G. Bakhshiev, Optics Spectrosc.10, 379 (1961)).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    N. S. Bayliss, J. chem. Phys.18, 292 (1950).Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Seely andJensen 8 discussed the band broadening due to the fluctuations in the interaction energy between the difference of dipole moments of the excited and ground states of the solute and the resultant field produced by the dipole moments of solvent molecules, and in that between the transition moment vector of the solute and the electronic polarization of the solvent molecules.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Freed andSancier assumed that the solvent species in binary mixture of polar solvents A and B are CHL-(A)2, CHL-(A)(B) and CHL-(B)2, and the solvent molecules are bound to Mg in the center of the porphyrin ring, on either sides of this ring (S. Freed andK. M. Sancier, J. Am. chem. Soc.76, 198 (1954)).Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    W. L. Butler, Arch. Biochem. Biophys.92, 287 (1965).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    T. H. Ji., J. L. Hess andA. A. Benson,Comparative Biochemistry and Biophysics of Photosynthesis (Eds.K. Shibata,A. Takamiya,A. T. Jagendorf andR. C. Fuller; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, and University Park Press, Pennsylvania 1967), p. 36.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    W. Kreutz, Ber. dt. bot. Ges.82, 495 (1969); Z. Naturforsch.25b, 88 (1970);Advanced botanic. Research (Academic Press, London-New York 1970), vol. 3.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    H. J. Perkins andD. W. A. Roberts, Biochim. biophys. Acta64, 2304 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Tomita
    • 1
  • T. Oku
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations