Advertisement

Medical Microbiology and Immunology

, Volume 165, Issue 4, pp 241–254 | Cite as

Influenza virus infection of the guinea pig: Immune response and resistance

  • John P. Phair
  • Carol A. Kauffman
  • Roy Jennings
  • Christopher W. Potter
Article

Abstract

Guinea pigs were inoculated by intranasal inoculation with unadapted, influenza virus A/England/42/72, and virus was recovered from nasal washings between 3 and 10 days post-inoculation. Infected animals did not exhibit a febrile response to infection, did not produce local antibody and produced only relatively low levels of serum antibody. However, they developed delayed-type hypersensitivity to influenza virus, demonstrable by both skin tests and macrophage migration inhibition tests, which was similar to that of man. The relevance of the influenza virus specific delayed hypersensitivity in immunity to infection was examined in this model. Guinea pigs previously infected with virus or passively immunized with hyperimmune serum were relatively resistant to reinfection with influenza virus A/England/42/72. Inoculation of guinea pigs with spleen cells from immune donor animals, together with or without immune serum, did not give or enhance resistance to challenge virus infection. The results do not suggest a role for delayed hypersensitivity response in immunity to influenza virus infection.

Keywords

Influenza Virus Influenza Virus Infection Macrophage Migration Challenge Virus Immune Serum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beveridge, W.I.B., Burnet, F.M.: A cutaneous reaction in influenza viruses. Med. J. Australia1, 85–89 (1944)Google Scholar
  2. Couch, R.B., Douglas, R.G., Rossen, R., Kasel, J.A.: Role of secretory antibody in influenza. In “The Secretory Immune System” pp. 93–113 U.S. Department of Public Health (1969)Google Scholar
  3. David, J.R., Al-Askari, S., Lawrence, S., Thomas, L.: Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro. I. The Specificity of inhibition of cell migration by antigens. J. Immunol.93, 264–273 (1964)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolin, R., Richman, D.D., Murphy, B.R., Cauci, A.S.: Cell-mediated immune responses following influenza in man. Clin. Res.24, 342A (1976)Google Scholar
  5. Fazekas de St. Groth, S., Witchell, S.J., Lafferty, K.J.: An improved assay for neutralization antibodies against influenza viruses. J. Hyg. (Camb.).56, 415–426 (1958)Google Scholar
  6. Freestone, D.S., Hamilton-Smith, S., Schild, G.C., Buckland, R., Chinn, S., Tyrrell, D.A.J.: Antibody responses and resistance to challenge in volunteers vaccinated with live, attenuated, detergent split and oil adjuvant A2/Hong Kong/68 (H3N2) influenza vaccines. J. Hyg. (Camb.).70, 531–543 (1972)Google Scholar
  7. Gitnick, G.L., Vincent, M.M., Auletta, A., Ley, A., Tzan, N., Sever, J.L.: Production of rubella haemagglutinating antigen in suspension cultures. Appl. Microbiol.15, 1244–1247 (1967)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Habershon, R.B., Molyneux, M.E., Slavin, G., Lowei, G., Tyrrell, D.A.J.: Skin tests with influenza virus. J. Hyg. (Camb.).71, 755–759 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Hobson, D., Beare, A.S., Ward-Gardner, A.: Haemagglutinin-inhibiting serum antibody titres as an index of response of volunteers to intranasal infection with a live, attenuated strain of influenza virus. Proceedings of the Symposium of Live Influenza Vaccines, Zagreb (1971) pp. 73–84 (Yugoslav Academy of Science and Arts, 1972)Google Scholar
  10. Jennings, R., Denton, M.D., Potter, C.W.: The hamster as an experimental animal in the study of influenza. I. The role of antibody in protection. Med. Microbiol. Immunol.162, 217–226 (1976)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jennings, R., Phair, J.P., Denton, M.D., Potter, C.W.: The hamster as an experimental animal for the study of influenza. II. The role of spleen cells in protection. Med. Microbiol. Immunol.162, 227–237 (1976)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jurgensen, P.F., Olsen, G.N., Johnson, J.E., Swenson, E.W., Ayoub, E.M., Henney, C.S., Waldman, R.H.: Immune responses of the human respiratory tract. II. Cell-mediated immunity in the lower respiratory tract to tuberculosis and mumps and influenza viruses. J. Infect. Dis.28, 731–735 (1973)Google Scholar
  13. McLaren, C., Potter, C.W.: Immunity to influenza in ferrets. VII. Effect of previous infection with heterotypic and heterologous influenza viruses on the response of ferrets to inactivated influenza virus vaccines. J. Hyg. (Camb.).72, 91–100 (1974)Google Scholar
  14. Meiklejohn, G., Kempe, C.H., Tahalman, W.G., Lennette, E.H.: Evaluation of monovalent influenza vaccines. II. Observations during an influenza A-prime epidemic. Amer. J. Hyg.55, 12–21 (1952)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Potter, C.W., Oxford, J.S., Shore, S.L., McLaren, C., Stuart-Harris, C.H.: Immunity to Influenza in ferrets. I. Response to live and killed virus. Brit. J. Exp. Path.53, 153–167 (1972)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Potter, C.W., Rees, R.C., Shore, S.L., Jennings, R., McLaren, C.: Immunity to influenza in ferrets. IX. Delayed hypersensitivity following infection or immunization with A2/Hong Kong virus. Microbios.10, 7–21 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed, L.J., Muench, H.: A simple method for estimating 50 per cent endpoints. Amer. J. Hyg.27, 493–497 (1938)Google Scholar
  18. Russell, S.M.D., McCahon, D., Beare, A.S.: A single radial haemolysis technique for the measurement of influenza antibodies. J. Gen. Virol.27, 1–10 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schulman, J.L., Kilbourne, E.D.: Induction of partial specific immunity in mice by a single infection with influenza A virus. J. Bact.89, 170–174 (1965)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Small, P.A., Waldman, R.H., Bruno, J.C., Gifford, G.E.: Influenza infection in ferrets: role of serum antibody in protection and recovery. Inf. Imm.13, 417–424 (1976)Google Scholar
  21. Virelizier, J.L.: Host defences against influenza virus: the role of anti-haemagglutinin antibody. J. Immunol.115, 434–439 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Waldman, R.H., Mann, J.J., Small, P.A. Jr.: Immunization against influenza: prevention of illness in man by aerosolized inactivated vaccine. J.A.M.A.207, 520–524 (1969)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Werner, G.H.: Immunité croisse'e hétérotypique chez la souris entre virus grippaux humains de types A et A2 C.R. Acad. Sci.263, 1913–1916 (1966)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Phair
    • 1
  • Carol A. Kauffman
    • 1
  • Roy Jennings
    • 2
  • Christopher W. Potter
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Infectious Disease, Department of MedicineCincinnati Veterans Administration Hospital and University of Cincinnati Medical CentreCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Department of VirologyUniversity of Sheffield Medical SchoolSheffieldEngland

Personalised recommendations